aristocrat

We’ve been over this. I never once said that. If you can go back and show where I said that I’ll delete my account. If you can’t you delete yours

We sat tight for the Russian investigation which turned out the FBI lied to get some warrants and turned into a political witch hunt. But this time it's different right? The FBI can and has done a lot of good. But they ***** up now and again and when they do it's a really big ***** up. Like the Parkland kids that got shot, the Mich St rapist where hundreds of girls got raped, Ruby RIdge, Waco etc.

Genie: you have 3 wishes. Me: I wish for a world without lawyers Genie: Done, you have no more wishes Me: you said I have 3! Genie: Sue me.

so still waiting on that proof. Otherwise you look foolish to keep bringing up these mythical nuclear documents that don’t exist except in the lefts alternate reality just like the Russian collusion myth. Anything to distract from reality

that’s it you got him now. It’s all over. Totally admitting to having them. Wasn’t being sarcastic.

Got a link to this proof?

Investigation into the lab and it’s funding and fauci might spend his final days in prison

FBI

That's called corruption.

So you'd be ok if the Repubicans used it against the Dems if they win the mid terms and presidency? Is this what you're saying?

He's the worst.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/reinhart-formally-rejects-doj-argument-to-keep-trump-affidavit-sealed-calls-raid-unprecedented Judge Bruce Reinhart on Monday admitted the FBI's raid on former President Trump's Mar-a-Lago home was "unprecedented," and formally rejected the Justice Department's argument to keep the affidavit leading to the search under seal, citing the "intense public and historical interest." Reinhart, in a filing Monday morning, said he rejects "the Government’s argument that the present record justifies keeping the entire Affidavit under seal." "The Government argues that even requiring it to redact portions of the Affidavit that could not reveal agent identities or investigative sources and methods imposes an undue burden on its resources and sets a precedent that could be disruptive and burdensome in future cases," Reinhart wrote. "I do not need to reach the question of whether, in some other case, these concerns could justify denying public access; they very well might." Good

Why did he just turn to the side instead of squaring up with the guy. Such a strange way to take on your guy

Didn't Obama weaponize the IRS against Republicans? I showed you a video of them literally practicing raiding a lawncare business for having extra vehicles and you are still believing they will only go after billionaires.

Ethan In Believeland or Ethan in the Factory of Sadness Take the route up through Washington than Montana and across the northern part of the country.