LeviF

More like it’s one of the reasons why the libertarian party will never get any traction. ***** good! Drugs good! Unlimited immigration good! In any case the LGBTQ agenda was never advanced by legislation nationally. It’s one of the most successful ramrods shoved through the broken federal court system in history.

Not elementary school but tangentially relevant. In 1999 it was seen as normal to portray a health teacher explaining to a high school student that porn is not representative of typical sexual relations between adults. And not only that, but to portray a 14 year old as being anxious and confused as a result of viewing pornography. Contrast this with the constant sexualization of minor characters in films and television today, the pushing of books *for children* containing pornographic content in schools, and "sex ed" summer camps for 7 year olds. Where's the fire and brimstone when you need it?

https://www.weteachnyc.org/resources/collection/lgbt-lessons/ This website is maintained by the NYC DOE.

There's one rule. Don't bet on sports. Especially don't bet on your own sport. This has been drilled into him since his first week as a student-athlete at Alabama.

Was he that bad last year?

Why are you so adamant that 5 year olds should be "educated" by school staff as to where ***** go?

In an absolute surprise to no one, Disney execs support grooming children. In other news, Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead.

Don't make me press my big red button! Putin? Who said anything about Putin?

Make this poll public so we know who supports thermonuclear war and who doesn’t.

Based on the tweet he posted I'm assuming he believes this bill infringes on LGBTQ rights. Which again begs the question that has yet to be answered, why is talking to kindergartners about sex in the category of "LGBTQ rights?"

Oh, I have a question! Why is it considered an "LGBTQ right" to speak to kindergartners about sex?

The sheer amount of sexual abuse perpetrated by so-called "educators" in schools in this country provides ample justification for ANY talk regarding sexuality between minors and school employees to be banned. The US Department of Education, in the mid-00's, estimated that 10% of all K-12 students will be sexually victimized by a school employee by the time they graduate high school. Do we think this number has gone up or down in the last ~15 years?

One sip more than I drink in a given amount of time.

https://tnc.news/2022/02/26/levy-toronto-elementary-students-given-gender-inclusivity-training/ https://genderspectrum.org/articles/educator-resources

Ding ding ding!

They'll be handing over that haul and then some for Watson.

It is. We should know by the end of the month what, if any, criminal charges he'll have to face.

When alphabet soup-sexuals refer to legislation which prevents school counselors from talking to kindergartners about sexual topics as "anti-LGBTQ," we should be asking ourselves what exactly that means and implies.

Except they won't expand oil production here. Even if they wanted to (they don't) it would take months to ramp up again. Going hat in hand to Venezuela after a VERY foreseeable oil price spike means only one thing: they want higher gas prices.

Ilhan drops ANOTHER great tweet. Say what you want about her at least she has some ***** principles.

He's not saying the effects weren't real, he's saying the effects were, in part, driven by corporate media. Similarly, when someone says "the hand-wringing over Ukraine is a manufactured MSM creation," they aren't saying that there aren't real people getting their panties in a wad over a country they wouldn't be able to differentiate from any other ex-Soviet state if you airdropped them in blind. They're saying that people only care because the media cares. The question he's arguing from isn't "did it happen," but "why did it happen?" How much of the Q following was generated organically can be argued to death. In the era of the internet it's an open question, but 8kun doesn't quite have the web traffic that your average corporate media site does.

I was very disappointed when it turned out Qanon was not Thomas Pynchon crafting his magnum opus.

Pete Rose has a lifetime ban. Based on that precedent alone the NFL will at least consider not letting him play again. When you open an account you submit to all of their terms and conditions. They can share your information with the government, contracted monitoring companies, etc. One of said companies is contracted by the NFL to investigate possible violations of league rules w/r/t NFL players/staff betting. Odds are your employer doesn't give a damn whether you gamble so long as 1) it doesn't affect your work product and 2) you aren't using company information to do so. The problem with Calvin Ridley is while he might not have been playing, how sure can we be about 2? How can the books and the shield assure their customers that this is all on the up and up?

Is the war in Ukraine about philosophy of government? Is it about reclaiming ethnic Russians for their motherland? Is it naked aggression and land/material greed? No you chud, it’s about black women in America.