LeviF

>most violent group on the planet

Same could have been said of Nixon in '60. The first televised debate against Kenney was an abject disaster. 65 million people saw a sickly, pale old man across from Kennedy. But yes your analysis is correct. DeSantis has no shot, similar to all the other Republican candidates who will go into Iowa looking to split roughly 45% of the vote between them.

Vivek is running the campaign that DeSantis should be running. I think DeSantis has a future in American politics. Dick Nixon ran an awful campaign in 1960 and lost. Ended up coming back and winning in '68. You learn, you grow, these things happen in politics just like in any other field. But these losers that he recruited to spearhead his online/social media and general public perception...yikes.

A half-measure. Or, really, 35% of a measure. Seize the endowments.

One of the problems with that, at least with the law, is that the boards still determine who is admitted to the bar. And professionally, the people on the boards still have livelihoods that depend on AI not replacing them.

Not with federal judiciary appointments. lol

Don't forget the MCAT and LSAT. Gonna have some serious competency crises in medicine and law in the near future.

Got the body of a goddess Got eyes butter pecan brown I see you girl (Droppin' low) She comin down from the ceiling (To the flo') Yeah, she know what she doin' (Yea, yea, yea) She doin' that right thang (Yea, yea, yeah) I need to get her over to my crib and do that night thang Cause I'm in love with a stripper

Right lol Nobody was ever supposed to believe that she actually earned her phd or her job.

I’m glad she wasn’t fired. If she was, it may have given the impression, to people of a certain level of credulity, that the institutions are salvageable.

Don’t need to. The “organized” militia all have wives, homes, mothers, daughters. It’ll sort itself out if it comes down to it. By the way, the Supreme Court says the 2A isn’t for the “militia” anyway, it’s for individuals. So your entire point, if you even had one to begin with, is moot.

Not only do you have to be blindingly stupid to not understand the 2nd in its historical context but you also have to be wildly ignorant of the various writings on the topic leading up to the ratification of the Constitution and the promises made to ratification’s initial opponents.

Fixed it for you. And that’s because of legislation.

No. You don’t know what the militia of the United States is, you don’t know what “well regulated” means, you don’t know what a “free state” is, and you don’t know what “shall not be infringed” means. Or you deliberately obfuscate it. Is it better to be malevolent or ignorant?

Capitalism is when you let in unlimited third worlders and print shitloads of money to drive down everyone else’s buying power.

“Line went up guys, that means that your grocery bill is lying to you!”

What’s to expose? The entire thrust of her campaign is “open wide Nimrata and these defense contractors are going to shove their favorite talking points in there for you to regurgitate.” Painfully obvious to everyone.

"carnage is a choice." Yet another example of the woke being more correct than the mainstream. The murder rate in America would drop to near zero if we actually punished criminals for the breaking of laws already on the books. The American experience with regard to homicide is exceptional in the fact that a very large percentage of them are preventable but the government simply chooses not to prevent them. The regime chooses this every day.

Do you realize That you have the most beautiful face? Do you realize We're floating in space? Do you realize That happiness makes you cry? Do you realize That everyone you know someday will die?

I've been flamed for a similar take in the past. Should be noted that Marino didn't exactly have the smallest head in the world either though so maybe the XXV outcome ends up being the same lol

It's basically just Foxworth and then a bunch of nobodies with blogs on the internet who say these kinds of things.

Has nothing to do with spending, or a country losing nearly an entire generation of men, or any number of other reasons why it was always a bad idea. Just that Trump is a Kremlin-owned asset. Who had four years in the WH which allowed Putin to continue to increase aggressions in Ukraine unabated, right? Oh, no, that didn't happen. But Trump did relax sanctions on Russia, right? Oh, no, that's right, that didn't happen either. But Trump did at least continue the Obama policy on not arming Ukraine, right? Hmm...no that doesn't track either. Wait, didn't Trump do nothing when it was found that Russia wasn't complying with arms treaties? I think at this point the questions will answer themselves.

Well, he probably wouldn't be using it as a lootbox for him and all of his favorite cronies.

Big fan of ol' Dick now, are we? Amazing how your ilk has come around to 2003-era foreign policy so easily. Almost as though you have no principles at all. Funny, that.

"Conservative" Liz Cheney: voted for gay "marriage" voted for Ukraine $$$ voted for gun control But she's "conservative" to the loons here. Lol, lmao