LeviF

I don't know anything about Dershowitz's proclivities. But he sure keeps strange company. He spent time in the waning days of the Trump admin lobbying for clemency for George Nader, who at one time was an intermediary between the governments of the UAE and...Israel

lol so what else does Dershowitz have in common with Epstein?

Connected to whom? Why would the Alexander Acosta extend this privilege to Epstein and not, say, the clients of UBS? And why did the New York County District Attorney's Office attempt to reclassify Epstein as a "low risk" sex offender (level 1) when he went back to NY? Was Cyrus Vance Jr. also blinded by money and fame?

Why was Epstein given a slap on the wrist?

One of Jimmy's good friends was Epstein's personal chef for years. And Jimmy drew first blood by suggesting on national television that Rodgers was intellectually impaired. Play around with dogs, catch some fleas. Not to mention Kimmel could have ignored it entirely and probably just come out on top by default.

This part is especially ironic because of the crown prince's relationship with the person named in this thread's title.

Got to really make sure that the public is too stupid to connect him and his activities to Israel before they release this “list.”

The entire mindset revolves around the lynchpin of “white men are oppressors who cannot ever be the victims of anything.” Just look at the way that the original residents of cities like Detroit, Philadelphia, and Chicago are portrayed. They are constantly vilified as the perpetrators of “white flight,” rather than the obvious victims of blockbusting and forced integration whilst staring down the barrel of the gun. It’s legitimately one of the most mindbending propaganda campaigns of the 1900s, and it didn’t happen in the USSR, it happened here.

Rufo co-opts the old Breitbart playbook effectively, I’ll give him that. Make your motives clear, slow drip the hilarious ***** as your enemy entrenches itself more and more until finally the enemy position is hilariously untenable but there is zero room to walk back because they got there one step at a time. Does Rufo care about this woman or whether she has her job? Probably not. But the goal isn’t necessarily to take the institution. When the institution cannot be taken the next best thing is to burn it down. Of course, what replaces her is almost certainly bad, if not worse, but that’s beside the point.

He’s married his wife is just an enabler.

Presumably they pick one per week.

Yeah, and everyone who voted for the law (and Abbott) knows all of this. Why then do you think it happened? Is this a stunt or a path to an actual constitutional crisis? I understand there’s some funny theories regarding Article IV as well but I think that’s mostly silly as compared to the two more realistic outcomes above.

Talk about giving away the game. “The solution to tons of third worlders crossing the border is…tons of third worlders crossing the border, but in a more orderly fashion!” These are not serious people, they that repeat regime talking points with no regard for their fellow citizens or neighbors. Another reason why it’s important to never forgive or forget the vile things said and done during peak COVID hysteria by, largely, the exact same people.

Right. Because claiming that congress has passed zero laws that could empower various arms of the federal government to fix this issue is definitely a triple digit IQ take. But even if that were true, if they did pass any laws to attempt to fix it you’d be crying racism or some similar witchery. Begone, you ***** goblin.

Just what God intended: Marlboro cigarettes.

Fact is that there are RICO beefs there for the taking. Violations of immigration law are RICO predicates. And yet there hasn’t been a single raid or arrest involving NGOs that quite clearly, and loudly, conspire to commit these crimes. Makes you wonder what the FBI is for.

So the great replacement has moved from conspiracy theory, to simple noticing, now officially to policy. “It’s not happening and it’s good that it is” indeed.

Twenty years ago this wouldn't have even been a headline. Candidate who held the highest office in the state of South Carolina wants to align herself philosophically with her base (small as it is), film at 11.

I think this guy is basically just 2008 Ron Paul in a different setting. So we'll get to see what that looks like if nothing else.

Even with the bump from that primary poll this is where the average stands for Haley right now, it what will likely be her best primary performance: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-primary-r/2024/new-hampshire/

Those of you who have been out of university since before the golden age of the internet don't know how it is right now. I served on my third-tier school's student conduct board, as a student representative. The way it worked is that if anybody accused a student of violating the conduct policy, that student would sit before a board consisting of one student, one faculty member, and one college staff member, usually a resident director or something like that. The board would hear the accuser, the accused, and witnesses called by both. Then the board would decide, by majority vote, whether that student did indeed violate the conduct policy. The disciplinary action taken as a result of a violation must be a unanimous decision. By far, the majority of cases I sat to hear involved accusations of plagiarism leveled at a student by a member of faculty. In 100% of these cases, the faculty member discovered the plagiarism through some kind of internet plagiarism detector, which trawled through academic paper databases to find similarities between an uploaded (student) paper and one or more of the hundreds of thousands of published articles out there. When I tell you that these profs brought up charges of plagiarism on the thinnest of "hits" from these detectors, I really mean it. Two or three similar sentence fragments, use of a particular word over another more common word, etc. Every time I hit "submit" on a paper, I hoped to God that I didn't somehow channel a sentence from a paper I had read early in the semester or something. Anyway, on nearly all of these plagiarism cases, the faculty and staff members on the board would automatically vote for a finding of violation. Sometimes I agreed, other times not. But majority rules, so that was that for that student's grade that semester (at minimum). I say all this to illustrate the assumption on at least one college campus: that students are guilty of plagiarism simply because some bot told the school that there was a certain amount of "similarity" between their paper and various published papers. Again, this was a small, third-tier school, and I doubt the attitude towards student plagiarism gets *less* rigid as you move up that ladder to the better institutions.

Considering that they're already a heavy tax burden on those of us who are net taxpayers, I'd say the reparations have been paid many times over. Enough with the gibs.

Is it pandering if it's correct? Once again leftists cheer and clap like seals whenever any ethnic group that isn't northwest European or old American stock acts entirely in their own self-interest, but when someone does it for Whites it's "pandering to the terrified." And he's an Indian for *****'s sake.

She's not running again. The only reason the NY Dems (the party, not individual dems) backed her up this past round is because of the short runway they had after Cuomo resigned. AG James has been told that the NY Dems will throw their money and support behind her in 2026, you best believe Hochul has been informed of that fact as well and will decline to run again.

Somehow I think the NYS DMV would be relieved if she 180’d back on that one.