LeviF

This this this !@#$ing this! The worst thing ever is being behind someone on the on-ramp and they don't accelerate until they're halfway into traffic. Then I'm sitting there stuck at 40mph because I was behind them and I have to merge into traffic that's going 70+ before the end of the lane comes around Those folks get a big ol' bird flip from me when I do get the chance to pass them. Luckily I-87 isn't too busy most of the time.

When we pick fights and hold arguments over stupid things, we divide America. Then, the focus on the actual issues is LOST because we are too busy trying to make everyone on the internet know that we have the biggest stones and e-muscles instead of solving the overall problem that some people out there are !@#$ing idiots. Give it a rest, you jackasses.

I was pretty close to the stage for a few big concerts/shows: Wu-Tang, Green Day, and The Killers. Oh, and I was on stage for part of a Ke$ha show The rest of the time I was standing in the first few rows of people near the barrier between the stage and the crowd.

Good of a time as any, I guess.

The hell is wrong with you? Go away.

You think that's fooling anyone? This. Damn kids these days.

No webcomics allowed, you jerks.

According to the SCOTUS, yes.

You should comment on his next blog post with this bit. The community would love it.

For me, it's a toss-up between C&H and Dilbert. I voted for Dilbert since I think you voted for C&H, Jay

Cribbage.

The people I typically see at rap/hip-hop concerts are spoiled white teenagers. The most trouble they cause are the lines at the beer tent when they can't believe that the vendor won't accept their fake ID so they can buy a $12 Bud Light.

My guess is that it's just something out of the norm. Most people are heterosexual; most people chip from the rough.

We get it, you don't like shoveling snow

Like I said, it's really only once in a while. And you're delusional if you don't think every justice does it.

Redheads!

Scalia is one of my favorite justices, but he pisses me off once in a while with his picking-and-choosing w/r/t his style of jurisprudence (Smith v. United States [91-8674], 508 U.S. 223 [1993] comes to mind).

Hope your day is filled with great beer!

Can this team just !@#$ing lose already?

This is a good snippet, NewBills.

Nobody has said anything about this post? Really? Tom? OC? Anyone? Sorry Dante, I dislike this ruling as much as you do, but CJ Roberts is far from being an idiot.

This is true. But then, I think PTR lives in Vermont. So, yeah.

No surprises here...but you're wrong. Again. And a quick forum search could have told you that. Or, hell, reading through this thread could have told you that. I always find it very amusing when the US Attorney is oblivious to the point where they can't make an argument that the justices are handing them on a silver platter.

Like I said, I probably wouldn't have made the decision Roberts did. It all comes down to what you hold in higher regard. You and I may see Congressional intent to be just as important as the actual function of the bill. But that's not Roberts's style. At least he's consistent, though.