LeviF

Always preferred the German knives myself. Still don't get the obsession with the Japanese cutlery. I have several pieces from the Wüsthof Classic collection.

Mother earth was asking for it.

Those google images answered for me. Leslie kNOPE.

Lattimore has such a policy. $1.7M is the figure, I think.

That's the point. We lost a home game to Toronto every year. Don't want to lose a home game to London.

Hey OC, did you see the new article? This one is great. http://www.slate.com...ml?wpsrc=fol_tw The only paragraph with content: There's a sorely underused form of psychotherapy called "Cognitive Behavioral Therapy," the basics of which include what you think affects how you feel. You learn to identify thought distortions and consider other possibilities. http://www.atlantaps...distortions.pdf In this case, let's look at 5 and 5a: 5. JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS: You make a negative interpretation even though there are no definite facts that convincingly support your conclusions. 5a. Mind Reading. You arbitrarily conclude that someone is reacting negatively to you, and you don’t bother to check this out

All professional sports are scripted. Duh.

!!!

Bring da ruckus.

http://instantrimshot.com/

Better hope the Bills are receiving to start the second half

Dude, come back over to the dark corner of TBD. We miss you*. *haha

I guess Godwin-ing your own thread 4 posts in, when you started it as ridiculously as you did, isn't such a terrible idea.

Pats* reportedly interested in both VJax and Martin. Wouldn't be surprised to see Martin go there if the Pats* offer some real value.

I counted fifth girl from the right at first for some reason. Had some questions for Mrs. SDS. Nice work, Scott and co.!

I'm assuming this was intentional (because I laughed) but I'm pointing it out just in case.

Amen and amen.

Yeah, the list goes on. The simplest explanation is basically, "because they aren't."

The full faith and credit clause was written primarily to preserve judgments across state lines. That way a party can't just run off to another state to escape enforcement of a judgment rendered. Its use has since been expanded to marriages (traditionally this was always the case), child custody orders, and protection orders (to name a few). Gun permits have not been included yet. You would need the Supreme Court or Congress to take a liberal (read: broad) view of the clause once again in order to get a court decision or some legislation through in order for this to happen.

Why? It's not like your chances got any worse for it.

With regard to full faith and credit they might as well be a state. Like I said, they're bound to it by statute (even after they became a "Commonwealth" or whatever they are now) thanks to the Court of Appeals. My point was largely that the Constitution doesn't address the issue (PR and full faith and credit) directly.

To be fair, what he said was far less retarded on a substantive level than your analysis of the judge's reasoning.

In PR's case it's actually a federal statute applied to them by judicial decision, since they aren't a state. Congress seems to lump them in with states nowadays, though.

You don't have to renounce your Canadian citizenship, do you? I thought dual nationality in the U.S. and Canada wasn't a huge deal.

Even if she was hot, I could probably only put down two legions of angels.