LeviF

His lawyers are between a rock and a hard place. Loser capital cases suck for defense attorneys.

As I said in this thread, I'm pretty sure he's channeling his inner Mellencamp.

Not trying to creep you out... but that lonza does look good.

Here's the original recipe, they weren't lyin': http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/126836-appetizers-fried-noodles-w-pickle-juice/

http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/25951-oh-this-is-nicereal-nice/

Was there ever a user called Hannibal Lecter here, or am I thinking of another forum?

Oh come on, that's not true. Brb, gotta browse VNN and Stormfront.

So Jesus comes back to pronounce judgment on the world and ends up in this gay dude's apartment, and there are two gay dudes just going at it in there. Jesus shakes his head and goes, "guys, I gotta send you both to hell." So which one does he send first? The bottom. He already has his **** packed.

Well, yeah. Pretty much any religion that's more than 100 years old isn't cool with dudes bangin out other dudes. Seriously not cool with said dudes getting hitched.

Snitches get stitches mother!@#$er. But yeah, solid move.

BRING BACK HOSSAGE

Well I'll say it. This is absurd. What happens if a college like Ball State refuses to play at a neutral site? It is their home game, after all. If it comes down to forfeiting games I'm not sure how long the student-athletes and coaches can be kept happy about it.

Obligatory:

Mennonites do, at least as far as I'm aware.

My argument is that the general terms used for sexual sin (especially in the Pauline letters) were used intentionally to cover any and all sex outside of the bounds of a marriage between one man and one woman. There are lots of kinds of sex that you can say aren't covered specifically in the New Testament, but I would say that they are most certainly covered generally by the terms used by Paul (for example: bestiality).

You're playing the same game that Justice (and other Muslims) play when they claim that Jesus never said he was God. It's a silly game based on a poor reading of the book.

...says the Trekkie.

This is true. But there are general condemnations of illicit sex (that is, sex outside of the bounds of marriage) many times over.

Let me ask this - who should be responsible for carrying out the penalty for apostasy?

Give the guy some credit; at least he's honest about it.

One of you Christians here needs to jump on this because I hear this **** all the time from Muslims/atheists/whatevers and it's just wrong, according to the Bible.

We veto anything Russia moves for. Carry on.

Fair enough. But posting something public that isn't truthful and damages a reputation...if it's not libel it's pretty damn close. The only thing at issue would be the truthfulness of the statement and whether or not posting on something like yelp counts as "publishing."

Yo, Russia, mind if we send some UN investigative types to check this out? Better that than a run-in with NATO once you flip a **** and invade Poland for seemingly no reason.

Nobody's suing anyone in this story. If you post something that misrepresents what actually happened you deserve what you get.