LeviF

My point was that marriage, in the United States (the only relevant time, then, being 1776-present. Maybe the early 1700s if you want to stretch it), has always been a religious concept. That it was co-opted by religion however many thousands of years ago is irrelevant to the conversation.

Despite today's SCOTUS ruling, I'm still pretty sure marriage in this case isn't allowed.

What does any of this have to do with marriage law in the USA (est. 1776)? My objections to the ruling in this particular case have nothing to do with religion, but I'm interested in hearing the answer anyway.

To ask the question is to answer it.

The Pope trolling jews. Who woulda thunk it?

You can't tell me you don't love this: The argument would be that the ruling does not extend freedom, that it instead limits it. Which, of course, is the longstanding argument regarding "judicial activism."

The best part about these contentious issues is that everyone on the Court writes brilliant arguments. All of the opinions written for this case are excellent reads. That said, Scalia's is !@#$ing hilarious. Love that guy.

At least he's in good company

Meanwhile, rumors are flying about that Hans Schellnhuber has been advising the Pope on climate change. The guy is an atheist and has some wacky ideas regarding the relationship between humans and the planet.

Boston too. Absolutely disgusting. Though when you're hammered and a slice as big as your torso is $2, Boston pizza doesn't seem so bad.

Filthadelphia. Best pizza. Ha.

Golf, tennis, cooking, probably get on the drums more than I do now. Like Chef, I have a pile of books I have to read. I'll probably be able to fill a house with them all by the time I get to retire.

Your insurance covers it?

Funny, that, considering Chicago has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation.

Yes. Gotta work in the all-lentil diet.

Sounds more like they didn't want him to speak because he'd probably ditch his canned speech and use the platform obnoxiously. Then some guidance counselor overreacted to something he said so now he can't attend. But that wasn't the original action.

More like gugly.

Claim that they have no idea whether you're trolling or not or whether you're just trying to draw out their stupidity. Use five paragraphs when five sentences would have done the trick. Work in emoticons somehow. 3.5

They don't have a beer or wine list on their website

JoeB's take: Bills QBs SO BAD that the punter is taking snaps at the position #hellyeahidid

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUVZsu36SW4

Pancakes - blueberries or chocolate chips in the pancakes if either are around. Butter and maple syrup to top. My childhood home had two rows of massive blueberry bushes. Breakfast waffles - Whipped cream, fresh strawberries, and maple syrup OR just a shitload of butter (every little square must have butter in it) and maple syrup Lunch/dinner waffles - fried chicken and maple syrup.

I'm in. Yeah. Gugny's going to put the moves on them so we get our drinks for free.

I think that if a man can call himself a woman and use the same bathroom as a six year old girl, it's perfectly within the rights of some white guilt-ridden, small-minded SJW to call herself black and take a position with an organization for colored folk.