LeviF

Jews are real after all? !@#$ there goes my latest conspiracy theory.

Only almost got murdered through online dating once (we think).

The drunken rants from last night are shitposts of beauty. I shed a tear reading them this morning.

They weren't waving guns, but that doesn't matter all that much. As far as whether they were "randoms walking out of room," the law says the jury doesn't get to MMQB OIS's. So it doesn't matter who they are.

As I said upthread, she likely already had mental health issues. The story is the timing. Not everyone who has mental health issues kills themselves. As far as the backlash goes, some of her fellow adult film stars were also saying nasty things on twitter about her. This wasn't your usual "shut up, whore" from internet randoms.

...because the prosecution didn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed second degree murder, reckless manslaughter, or aggravated assault. There that was easy.

I noticed that too Matchmaker, matchmaker...

I'm sure SBF has some redeeming quality that overrides the fact that he doesn't know Calvin & Hobbes.

You don't get banned for outright lies. Had he called you a smelly Asian, on the other hand...

Is no longer in Macungie (SA-LUTE!) Doesn't post very often.

Wars have consequences. Mexico is welcome to attempt to take back Tay Haas and whatever else. And no, Canada does not "pretty much" have guarantees of free speech or religion. You either do or you don't. Canada does not.

Fergy only cheats like 60% of his clients.

Female adult film stars aren't known for their stellar mental health. It is extraordinarily likely that she had issues way before the twitter fiasco. That said, the reaction to what she said speaks volumes. The adult film industry has had HIV-related scandals in the past, usually having to do with men who have sex with men or transvestites on camera. In the world of porn, actors who shoot gay scenes don't get tested as frequently or strictly as actors and actresses who shoot straight scenes, due to condom use in gay scenes. Her concern was a reasonable one, probably based on this knowledge and incidents like the one involving Darren James. But the reasonableness of her position doesn't matter because, as Boyst pointed out upthread, it's a cardinal sin now to speak out about homosexuality, or anything to do with homosexuality, unless it is 100% "affirming" or "supportive." The SJWs who have been screaming "her body, her choice" are now outed as liars (once again) because it's actually "her body, (and as long as it lines up with our narrative) her choice." Because she had very reasonable concerns about STDs she didn't want a man who has sex with men to be inside of her. But instead of going along with the idea that women shouldn't be pressured into having sex with someone they don't want to have sex with, SJWs start foaming at the mouth because an "oppressed class" may be offended. The only side that SJWs are on is their own. They care about sex workers except when they don't. They care about woman's choice except when they don't. Since August committed wrongthink it's ok to bully her until she kills herself and then laugh about it, but when someone does it to them cyberbullying is wrong, you racist homophobic Nazi. The only things they really care about are recognition of their made-up victimhood and flattery of their feelings. Tl;dr: SJWs always lie. Never forget it.

In all seriousness, gringo is probably a good dad.

Oh good call baby boy

And lots of people have been drinking and driving for a long time and haven't gotten caught as well. What's your point?

Well in that case the fines collected from all the DUIs will provide money for roads. Win win!

Chandler#81 or some such. One of the mods.

Professional point-misser. It's the previous poster's career, not the previous career of the above poster.

Roma? CL? Some kind of tomato competition?

No wonder you don't make any damn sense to me. You're always sober, I'm always drunk. Gotta catch me as soon as I wake up in the morning.

Please post an update with the number of PMs you got for this

If they otherwise qualified and went through all of the proper channels to obtain naturalization? No. My argument was against your actual position (the bailey): that we should allow unfettered immigration and essentially go borderless.

I have given you one justification, you just don't like it. If you don't like the way the laws are, lobby and vote to change them. It's a non-sequitur because travelling from California to Texas is fundamentally different from travelling from Mexico or Canada or wherever to the United States. There's no comparison to be made until California or Texas secedes, as they are wont to threaten to do. I never said I want the law to say people from Mexico can't come here. Please supply a quote if I did. And if you really want to have fun with google-fu internet forum fallacies, here's one for you: motte and bailey. It's a game you've been playing for four pages in this thread.