LeviF

Pound sand, Patsies** fan. But yeah whatever merry Christmas (but not a merry Christmas Eve )

Possibly an issue with your browser or somesuch. Here's a link instead for mine: http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/176/880/239.jpg

Not trying to be a dick, I just don't think you're as ignorant about the subject as you're claiming to be. If you are, that's fine, but I've long operated under the assumption that you're not. 2,996 people lost all of their freedom, as well as their right to live, on that day. The US Constitution is clear: its purpose, among other things, was to, "insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence...and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity." "Fighting for our freedom" may be useless sloganeering and sometimes inaccurate but I wouldn't say it's always inaccurate. Ousting the Taliban-controlled government in Afghanistan was, arguably, done for the freedom of millions of American citizens. Al Qaeda was hit hard and only recently have their quasi-affiliates regained some of the strength and power it once wielded.

Disingenuous, then. You know just as well as I do that Al-Qaeda enjoyed state-sanctioned shelter in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan. Furthermore they were involved in military training there as well. This game you're trying to play doesn't work on anyone not willing to do entire sets of cartwheels and somersaults with their brains.

The collective "our?" No, I suppose not. But part of what the USA was founded on was this idea that her citizens have a right to life and the "blessings of liberty" as the Constitution says. I'm not fond of every military action nor do I think "fighting for our freedom" is often the best way of describing what American troops are doing, but the line "no attacks on US soil since Pearl Harbor" is deliberately misleading and I think you know that.

Oh good, we're back to the Protocols.

2,996

Huh? Dude when's the last time you read National Geographic? ****'s gotten edgy. Pick up a copy.

It's common for priests in small tribes who perform human sacrifice to take portions from the sacrifice and eat and to give some to honored guests. It's considered very rude to refuse and can stir up violence in the less peaceful tribes.

Bills fans are just salty because he played for us and, well, played like a middling draft choice.

There's a reason why human flesh is called "long pork."

That's because Bill Belichick and co are playing 9D chess while we're out here playing Connect 4 17.

Well sure, Palestinian gun ownership is strictly regulated (read: banned) by the Israeli government. But it's not like they can't or don't obtain guns. Additionally, those "harmless" "bottle rockets" have this nasty habit of killing people here and there too.

Oh, and also: http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/09/israelis-shot-dead-west-bank-settlement-170926050212671.html

That uneasy feeling is the probably your instinct that there's a predator nearby. Thanks, Darwin.

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. That said I love watching it. Keep it up, boys! Those tables aren't gonna break all by themselves!

Yeah, and Israel did 9/11. Look I generally try to listen to what you have to say but if you think the Palestinians have never had guns I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale.

Tomatoes on a hot dog it's basically a sandwich at that point. AND A HOT DOG IS NOT A SANDWICH YOU !@#$S

Chicago "pizza," like the Chicago "hot dog," is a abomination unto God and man. Actually it's pretty tasty I just object to it being called "pizza."

This isn't a terrible idea. Only issue is I don't know of any bars that are hiring people close to 40 with no experience. Maybe start as a barback at a vet-friendly bar or a cop bar if your disability doesn't keep you from lifting and moving stuff.

Their portraits are what get me. All up in uniform and everything

You should stick to trolling on the main board. You aren't good at it there either but at least you'll get a rise out of someone there.

The POTUS has ultimate authority but no rank, as designated by Article 2 of the US Constitution. Additionally, the UCMJ doesn't apply to him.

Technically no, the POTUS is still a civilian.