LeviF

If I were to stretch a bit, I'd say it's because certain inner cities are absolute warzones despite very tight gun restrictions and most victims of inner city violence are black. Really it's a political ploy to attempt to paint leftists/Democrats as uncaring about black people. And if I'm honest, I don't hear that "black-on-black violence" line so much (read: at all) in the conversations about gun restrictions as I do in the conversations about police shootings, so I think you're off base with this one.

Most violent crime is intraracial. Nobody disputes this. Your non sequiturs are getting more and more desperate though. It's kind of adorable. I'm gonna assume (probably a poor assumption, but whatever) that you simply misread what I wrote and that you do know what the prefix "intra-" means.

Hoo boy. The sedevacantists are having a field day now.

I don't care about advertisers on Fake News but just wanted to say your new avi pic is horrifying

Yeah, sounds like every socialistic government ever.

What world are you living in that the Republican party is anything but leftist? Get back in the Delorean, Doc, you belong 50 years in the past.

An illustration for you: ________________________D_______R_________________________________________________________________________________________ See that line? Imagine it's the left/right political line. Modern Democrats sit right around that D. As far as I can tell, modern Republicans sit right around that R. So Republicans are "right" in only a relative sense. At least, that's how I see it.

Regardless of what their stated purpose might be, their actual purpose is to ban private ownership of firearms. They'll take inch after inch until they get the whole mile, as the last 100 years of legislation clearly demonstrate.

She's a bit plain but definitely better looking than that awful picture lets on.

Uh, not me? What's your point?

And again, that's not really the point. If you surrender your rights in any way you've given them the power to do whatever they want, which is exactly what the 2A was crafted to prevent.

As Tasker has said, eroding the 2nd Amendment further is not strictly about BATFEces agents walking into my house, shooting my dog, and taking my guns. I'm not saying that armed patrols are out looking for my guns right now. What I'm saying is that further erosion of the 2A is giving the government the power to do just that. Making pro-2A people out to be paranoid lunatics only drives that crowd further into one-issue voting.

No, ignorance because you didn't know that people do use AR platform rifles to hunt. Not knowing something is, by definition, ignorance of that something. It's not a matter of adequacy. Despite the old saying, a knife is often adequate in a gun fight, but that's not the point.

Is it protected information in CA? It's not in NY, anybody can look up the status of an inmate through the DOCCS website, including release to probation/parole.

Like every other failed (read: every other. full stop) Leftist idea, socialism is based on a principle of "give up some freedom for more security." To riff on Ben Franklin a bit, a man who gives up liberty for security deserves neither and is not a man.

You know, you say stuff like this and it makes me happy. Roll back the bloated, overwrought programs that have been overblown and largely ineffective while !@#$ing over the American people. !@#$ yeah! Then you say **** like this without a whit of irony and it makes me sad. Let's create more bloated, overwrought programs that will be overblown and largely ineffective while !@#$ing over the American people.

That doesn't make him any smarter or more informed or less immature than any other 17 year old (or however old he is). He can be criticized just like any other 17 year old with a megaphone can.

Can we clear something up real quick? Being a "survivor" does not grant you special status in and of itself nor does it make your ideas/opinions any more valid than before you "survived" something nor does it put you above criticism. While "victim" and "survivor" are now the greatest titles one can hope to achieve in the SJW's world, they don't make you special. That is all.

I think not being able to take a joke is what's actually actually racist. Your move, shitbird.

That's racist

Yeah, because having Neil deGrasse Douchebag tell you what to think is so much more think-for-yourselfie than the pope or whatever telling you what to think.

Meanwhile... https://www.dailywire.com/news/22906/buzzfeed-guys-test-their-testosterone-levels-amanda-prestigiacomo

Dr. Dana Fisher's quick and dirty analysis showed that less than 10% of the people involved in the march were under 18 years old. But yeah high schoolers put this together. Imbeciles.

Pls stop with the autistic screeching meme. You're hurting my fee fees.