LeviF

Damn I didn’t really search just scanned the page.

https://www.gloucestershirelive.co.uk/news/gloucester-news/bomb-squad-called-gloucestershire-royal-6298076

I've said it a million times. The crazy part about Q isn't the idea that there are rings of pedophiles in elite positions in government. The crazy part is the idea that anybody with power cares enough to do something about it.

Which high-tier fourth estate member has taken this and run with it? None? Oh. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/amphtml/jasonleopold/cia-employees-sex-crimes-children-secret-files-foia

Pretty uninspiring couple of first drives there.

Are they not going to count the bowl game? lol

Based on yesterday's rankings yes. But the committee loves the smell of their own farts and Baylor is currently 9 while Houston is 21. I'm not guaranteeing anything but it's something to consider.

If Bama wins I don't see a path for Cinci unless one of either OKST or Michigan loses their title game. Bama wins, Georgia gets in too I would think, unless Bama really beats the brakes off them.

STI's, fatasses, smokers, etc. Again, when can we start denying catamites health insurance and prescription drug payouts for HIV-related treatments? And when can we stop the flow of billions of dollars (~$28B/annum) in AIDS spending?

With regard to the father and 3rd dude: felony murder exists for a reason. You can make an argument for the guy filming but not the dad I don’t think. In any case the jury rejected that argument.

Now do gay people and AIDS.

It's the same strategy as 1/6 - "Sicknick killed by insurrectionists" or Rittenhouse "killed black people." They know that the emotional impact of the initial (false) story is what will stick with most normal people.

What felony did he commit? I didn't follow his stuff that closely.

I'm trying to sort your reasoning but my experience with the court system makes your position unclear to me. What do you mean by "confession?" As in a confession that is presented to a jury within the rules of evidence? Or an allocution? Or at any point in time they "confessed," whether under a circumstance where it falls under the various rules of evidence and within their consitutional rights to be presented at trial, or not?

Fact check: true. Regardless of what Arbery was doing in that construction site, you can't confront him at gunpoint when it's not your *****in business. He posed no threat to you or yours. Do not pass go, *****.

“Hate crime” is just an escalator for felonies that involve thoughtcrime, which relies on a ruling class to decide. Based on who gets prosecuted for “hate crimes,” we understand who the ruling classes favor.

Tbh he sounds like he's ok, for now. Doesn't seem to have open hatred for the institutions that wronged him like many would (justifiably) in his position. I hope he has reasonable voices in his life telling him the right things. Hopefully the Tucker thing doesn't turn into a silly interview tour 'round the various right wing outlets. It's important to get a good face out there and make people face the lies they've told, but one big national interview is more than enough.

He was defamed, with actual malice. He has lawyers feeding him that because he will, and should, sue the ***** out of any number of public officials and media members.

The “self-defense, amirite?” repeated ad nauseum by libs since the hate crime/terrorist attack in Waukesha is a distilled, pure example of “the left can’t meme.”

Mainstream media already working overtime to memory hole this. Which means we can assume that it’s exactly what we already deduced it to be: a terrorist attack carried out by a serial violent criminal. Because the fourth estate and the lying regime is lying/covering up about it we have to put the pieces together quicker than normal.

At this point there are two reasons to be this ***** up about the verdict: 1. Ignorant of all pertinent facts of the case and the laws of the state of Wisconsin. 2. Belief that a child has no right to defend himself from an attacking pedophile and other felons backed by a mob. At this point, for 1 to be the case would require a level of willful blindness I’m not sure even the least capable posters could muster. So it’s likely 2. And if it’s 2, why is it that they believe a pedophile should be able to freely attack a child? Really makes you wonder.

“It’s racist because I said it’s racist.” Get the hand out of your ass, muppet. Nobody cares.

lol shut the ***** up you dumb *****. You’re a loser. Nobody’s buying what you’re selling. Nobody here cares if you call them a racist, whether in earnest or as a bull#### rhetorical device designed to slander your enemy. Nobody. Cares.

Ridin’ The Storm Out *****in rocks. REO did a decent show back in the day. Actually seen them a couple times recently whilst working and they still bring the energy.