SageAgainstTheMachine

I can agree with that. But I like to play devil's advocate when talking about Kennedy. Because he was assassinated, history views him through rose colored glasses as some infallible knight in shining armor, something he was not.

Examples please. Other than the example I already mentioned. Have you actually watched enough of the Chiefs this year to know that the coaches try harder, or are you just operating on a pre-conceived notion? Because, really, you shouldn't be praising the coaching staff of a 1-9 team without good reason.

He also botched the Bay of Pigs Invasion so badly that the world was almost brought to its knees by nuclear weapons. And I think we have Robert Kennedy and McNamara to thank for guiding us out of the missile crisis. Kennedy was also notoriously bad at getting his legislation pushed through Congress due to his inexperience. That said, history looks upon him as a charismatic man that gave the country hope during the Cold War and who genuinely cared about and believed in his country.

Ok I agree 100%. But are you basing that solely on Herm Edwards' decision to go for 2 to win the game against San Diego? Or do you comprehensively know that KC tries harder to win than us?

And yet, they have been losing. I guess it doesn't matter.

That is rough, dude. Watching the Bills lose is always better from a recliner on a big screen.

Edwards has not been audibling on those interceptions.

Well that's a vapid generalization about finishing 5-11 or 11-5, but I agree with the sentiment that we should run the ball more. But not because I've lost faith in Edwards, because I think he will be the primary beneficiary of an improved running game.

You use Brees as your example of a touch passer, but I think a better one would be Chad Pennington. He doesn't put much zip on the ball, but he can lob grenades right into the waiting arms of his receivers. Brees isn't a bad case either, but I think his loft comes from his being too short to simply zip it over the line.

So outed gays shouldn't be allowed in the military because you find them creepy? I find taxidermists kind of creepy, I guess I should get to lobbying for taxidermists to be disallowed from the military too.

Oh, ok. Well according to a diehard Knicks fan who's a friend of mine, they are after him. He correctly predicted Crawford and Randolph would be gone so I'm gonna take his word on this one.

Yeah, and that statement would make sense if the members of twobillsdrive were the ones drafting. Of course, it's the front office's job to dwell on the pick to make sure they don't make similar mistakes with another QB, but we as fans have no responsibility to study Losman.

Umm, this is a public message board dude. Nobody has to be invited into a thread. Send PMs if you don't want anyone and everyone responding.

Yeah, but aren't we pretty poor compared to most teams when it comes to YAC?

Does anybody know who is lined up to be quarterback next season for the Bulls? I think Naaman Roosevelt and James Starks are both juniors, so the offensive weapons will still be there, but who is going to be the new field general, and can he repeat this sort of season?

How dare you make such an assertion??? Haven't you been reading these boards at all? If you had been, you'd know that Edwards is a lousy good-for-nothing weak-armed QB who wouldn't even be able to throw it down field if he wasn't too scared to!

how quickly we forget

Simple question, what will the Bills' record be at the end of the year? I'm interested to see if the most popular answer is the same as the actual result.

Also, Chase Patton (the backup from missouri) is slated to go pretty high.

I don't know where you are getting your information from, but nobody has McCoy pegged as a first round pick. Out of everybody, Stafford is ranked the highest (has absolutely a GUN for an arm.) And Harrell? I don't know. He's got a nice arm and pocket presence, and his numbers are absolutley gaudy, but he's a product of the Texas Tech system. Just like Timmy Change and Colt Brennan haven't made a splash, it might be the same story for Harrell. But time will tell.

I don't think resting people is a good idea. Ball State will be an incredibly tough opponent and they want to head into the game with a full head of steam. Besides, knowing UB they'll have to win the game in the 6th OT or something.

Word on the street is that the Knicks' targets are Lebron and Carlos Boozer (another 2010 guy).

Yes, but almost everybody I talk to seems to have the same "Buffalo is a dead end, the NFL will make far more money if the franchise moves to Toronto" attitude. That's more what I was talking about.

Well from an attendance perspective, the Blue Jays and Expos were the two teams that suffered the worst from the 1994 strike year. Of course for the Expos fans, there was a feeling of treachery because they were a heavy favorite to win the World Series that year. But aside from that, I've always found it interesting that Canadian baseball never really recovered from the strike, whereas the American teams show no lingering effects.

Says the man who constantly refers to Trent as a "glove wearing Mary". And yes, I must be REALLY misunderstanding a mathematical principle if I think 6-4 is better than 5-5. Having control of tiebreakers helps. Not having to rely on tiebreakers helps more.