There are certain occasions when the primary blame for a team's faulty play can be predominately placed on the shoulders of one player. That player is never a running back.
Have you talked to Edwards? Has he told you his confidence is waning?
And yes, Losman has nothing to lose and everything to gain if he is reinstated as a starter. However, Edwards is the QB of the future and he has everything to lose and nothing to gain from the same scenario.
Sure, whatever you say dude. It's good to know there's somebody out there that knows who was and wasn't meant to play football based on 2 minute long clips of their locker-room banter.
I think he's smart relative to most football players. O-linemen generally get the highest scores on the Wonderlic and he did graduate from Cal Berkeley so I doubt he's dumb. But conversations on 19th century English lit? I think not.
How a player acts off the field serves as zero indication of how they act on the field. People simply become different when that adrenaline starts flowing. There are tons of viscious athletes who are genuinely nice people and good family men. "Softies" as you put it. A good example would be Paul Gaustad or Andrew Peters.
We shouldn't need a miracle to score on the Cleveland defense.
That being said, we probably will need a miracle given how we always fail to exploit the negative aspects of a team.
Ok well Heidi was a just a hypothetical example. There's plenty of hotter women out there but they're relatively close to my age for the most part so the analogy wouldn't have worked. And if you've seen the south park where they explore atheism and evolution, you know that she'd be screaming "Oh Science!" "Oh Science!"
I'd start Marshawn over Earnest Graham, especially with Cadillac Williams returning next week. But yeah, if your two quarterbacks are going to be Trent and Kyle Orton, I'd keep McNabb on my team since Orton is injured now.