Vizquel...now there's an interesting case. SPECTACULAR defensive player. He's the Brooks Robinson of shortstops, and I really think that should be enough.
Offensively...I have to disagree. A middling career batting average masks a poor OBP (.337) and a terrible slugging percentage (.353). All of it combines for a .690 OPS. That's usually bad enough to earn a ticket back to Triple A, but again, he had that magical glove. Let's compare slash lines of some of the SS's to which Vizquel will be compared...
Larkin: .295/.371/.444/.815
Jeter: .313/.383/.449/.832
Wagner: .328/.391/.467/.858
Yount: .285/.342/.430/.772
Ripken: .276/.340/.447/.787
Vizquel: .272/.337/.353/.690
Those are 4 of Vizquel's contemporaries, plus the greatest SS of all time, just for good measure.
As you can see, Yount is the closest comparison and even his OPS is about 80 points higher. He got to Cooperstown for breaking the 3,000 hit mark. I've never been a huge fan of the logic because 3,000 hits is a testament to longevity. Yount played for 21 seasons, Vizquel for 22. It would be difficult to NOT approach 3,000 hits. If Vizquel chooses to hobble around until he reaches the milestone, does that suddenly make him a better player? Derek Jeter could probably wax toward 4,000 if he chooses to play until 2017, but that has a better chance of stealing from his greatness than adding to it.
Another stat that sabermetricians love is WAR (wins above replacement) which accounts for offense and defensive potency. So the number essentially means, how many wins did this player add or subtract from his team over the course of his career if the alternative is a hypothetical replacement level bench player.
Larkin: 68.9
Jeter: 70.4
Wagner: 134.5 (and no, I don't know how they calculate this for players from the 1890's, but that is just ridiculous)
Yount: 76.9
Ripken: 89.9
Vizquel: 42.3
Again, not quite in the same league, but his dWAR (defensive wins above replacement) is 13.3, higher than any of the others.