Alphadawg7

No he didn't. He had CONSENSUAL sex with a girl lying about her age and claiming to be in college and over 18. Not only did the accuser right out the gate tell authorities it was CONSENSUAL about the encounter they had and could remember outside the house, but it was also proven that Matt was 100% free and clear of the next encounter as he was not even on the property near the time of events. FURTHERMORE - Not only was Araiza cleared, but the other guys who were actually in the room during the 2nd encounter were cleared of any wrong doing or assault from actual video footage of the incident from inside the room the incident took place. This is the same girl who was running around telling people they are p***ys if they don't f*** her and has run around on VIDEO boasting about how many guys she bangs and wants to bang at multiple other frat parties. So for you to keep calling it a "sexual assault" just makes you ignorant and too stubborn to admit that your undying belief into Araiza's guilt BEFORE having ANY evidence to the contrary was wrong. This isn't a case where they just didn't have enough evidence to file but knew they were guilty. They were all cleared of all accusations from DIRECT EVIDENCE. This girl was as authentic in her claims as Jussie Smolet was in his attack and George Santos was on his resume.

Another reason why it was too soon to give up on Elam. I still think he has a future here

Another Duke Williams thread I see

Update: Suddenly now winning the division is also a potential possibility again too in terms of how we enter the playoffs. Just need to handle our business and beat dem ‘boys this weekend. LFG! GoBills!

Dak outside in Buffalo is not a good recipe for the Cowboys

2 words: Punt God

3 of those losses to Allen But yeah, I agree with all that

Yeah, refs have screwed us so many times this year and our coaches and players always go with no comment and never blame the refs and take responsibility for what we did wrong. Pretty weak by Mahomes

Thanks, and I still remain confident To be fair, as far as that TD over turn, Allen still gets the ball back down 3 or 4 (depending on XP) with over a minute to go and 3 time outs. We don’t necessarily lose the game if that TD stands like some are assuming. And while we got that break with the flag, it was a legit flag, and KC has benefited from mistaken flags like when Mahomes got hit in bounds but the ref still threw the flag last week or week before as if it was unnecessary roughness for hit out of bounds. Or last year in the SB Against Eagles, refs blew so many calls against the Bills or we might have won that game too. Chiefs shot themselves in the foot and had just gotten away with a mugging on a non call PI on Diggs in the endzone too the drive before. So like with the Bills losses, you can’t let the game be close to where a good or bad call flips a potential win into a loss. LFG! GoBills!!!

That was an elite defense. Let’s not forget that either, that D has carried KC most the season

Well then you can apply that logic to multiple Bills losses too for killing themselves

1 down… 4 to go…

Melon farmer is the only reason we are in this game or have any wins on the season. You need a new schtick, this one is played out

Totally agree, 100% that is what that was. Allen absolutely turfed it to save the clock when the quick out was not there. Surprised people don't get that

You are literally not worth the time to discuss this with. You already proved your petty dislike since year 1, there is literally no possibility for an objective discussion on the matter with you. You’ve made your mind up 7 years ago.

I don’t disagree with this, except I would argue we still can win a SB with him. Worse HC’s and worse teams have won SBs. But it would be nice if he at least reduced some of these late dumb decisions like the timeout at end of Philly game. He may still make that kick regardless, but to make it easier was about as stupid as it gets.

Literally nothing you say on the subject can be taken with any seriousness. You’re one of a handful of people here who revel in the negativity, it’s like literally your primary purpose here. And this article is like your crowds Xmas

I mean they don’t care about it in a negative way, like it won’t affect how they feel about him. If anything it will just make them rally harder

I don’t think anyone inside that locker room really cares about this biased article. They are focused and united on winning this game the same as they were before the hit piece came out that read a lot more like a jaded ex GF than it did as a real journalistic piece with important information.

That’s fair, but I still see the offense as the bigger culprit for our record.

Huh? This post makes no sense. I haven’t supported Dunne one bit, I think you replied to the wrong poster.

This you above? LOL, and I had already called this before you said "Let's just call this." Then you proceed to follow that up with trying to go back into the discussion? LOL The definition of "complimentary football" is also utterly irrelevant. You are trying to paint a skewed definition about it to deflect any Dorsey blame regarding the offense and make it all the fault of only McD because that serves your overall agenda against McD. You are only interested in finding confirmation bias for your theories, you are not actually interested in discussing the points. So any further discussion on the matter with you is futile. Doesn't matter how I or anyone will define it, you have already made up your own mind about what it means and you have already decided that no possible definition other than your own personal interpretation and theory are correct.

Personally I highly doubt they regret it. There is a reason he wasn't credentialed and he has on multiple occasions validated that decision. Winning erases a lot of things and Losing magnifies them...Bills beat Chiefs and Cowboys next week and literally no one will be talking about this except the crowd that wanted McD gone before this article came out. However, we lose to KC, especially if there are poor decisions made that contribute to the loss, and it will definitely help the story stick around longer and could weigh on his future here. But ultimately, this won't follow McD outside of Buffalo once his time is over here. He has a high % coaching record for an organization that was inept before he got here. He is going to get another chance somewhere else once his time in Buffalo is done.

Well his coaching record says otherwise regardless of anyones opinion. And no, I am not excuse making for McD, I haven't made a single excuse for him. Did not flip flop on a single thing. So no idea where you are getting that from. Seems to me you are painting your own version of things I have said rather than taking the things I said at face value for what I actually said. This is what I mean...you are so rooted in your disdain for McD that you struggle to even comprehend what someone else might say if it isn't full of the same disdain you have. Because throughout your post here, as you will see more below, you are completely off base in even understanding what I actually said in the posts you are responding to and referencing. Im not trying to be rude, but you clearly are not actually reading the posts you are responding to or just not paying attention when you do. This exactly what I wrote in the very post you are responding to...and yet you still managed to write this reply above? So should McD right now be fired...NO. Should he be if we miss the playoffs...YES. Should he be safe if we just make the playoffs...NO (but probably is). I mean I literally stated right there that he should not be safe for just making the playoffs. And then you go on to lecture me as if I am saying he should ONLY be fired if we MISS the playoffs? Which is NOT at all what I said. So you are again accusing me of saying or implying something that I did not do or say because you are either failing to comprehend what I actually said or just not reading the info you are responding to. I literally listed not getting rid of Dorsey SOONER is grounds for McD's future to be in jeopardy if the team does not turn it around. I literally directly held him accountable and LITERALLY and VERBATIM said it should be one of the primary reasons why he should be fired if we do not turn the season around and make a deep playoff run. Yet here you are again, completely making up some narrative and completely ignoring what I actually said. Again, you can't seem to separate someone being objective with someone who is an "apologist". Nothing I have said makes me a McD apologist, I have literally stated not only in this thread, but in other threads, that his job should be on the line right now and if we miss the playoffs or squeak in and lose early or embarrassingly again that a HC change needs to happen. Yet you keep coming at me twisting what I did say into things I did not say.

Not even remotely what I said. But ok.