Jump to content

Alphadawg7

Community Member
  • Posts

    23,814
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Alphadawg7

  1. The issue is that they find those receivers and beat up on weak teams then lose to teams over .500 despite the offense. And that is largely because teams like the Bills have given a blueprint to disrupt the offense which despite all that speed is not that hard to counter by just getting Tua off his early reads. No doubt they still can be dangerous, but I just can’t see how they don’t take a step back this year with a much more dangerous AFC and the losses they took on defense. And a small step back even would have had them miss the playoffs the last 2 seasons. But then again, that’s why they play the games, so who knows. But I personally don’t like how they are building that team, it’s not one that will lend itself well in the postseason against the powerhouse teams of the AFC. And IMHO I think the GM and staff will be fired if they miss the playoffs this year without major injuries being the reason.
  2. By gutting their defense. If Rodgers stays healthy for the Jets, Miami won’t make the playoffs IMO. They barely made it in the last 2 seasons with what was a better roster than they will have this year. And the AFC overall is even tougher this year
  3. I said there was no way to insure they don’t get him. And given how the draft fell, it is quite plausible, and even probable, they still get him either via a trade with one of the other 3 teams after us or him lasting to their pick. And we took draft capital away from them in the process too. But hey, this is apparently a sore subject for many who seem hell bent on making this into a thing. I’m not gonna waste any more time or energy on it personally, it’s all good. PS: IMHO Beane is not on thin ice nor has he had a rough year. Thats your personal take on him, but I doubt that’s it’s how he is seen by the majority and more importantly not how the team or his employers see him either.
  4. No reason to be rude, and I disagree that It’s the way it works. There was zero the Bills could do to insure the Chiefs didn’t get Worthy. So to sit here and whine about it, post every highlight or low light in camp is just a silly premise. Especially when the guy we took has had by far the superior camp anyway. And the reason he made sense is because they didn’t need size with Rice and Kelce and he isn’t going to need to be a lead WR1 piece there with them and Brown. Reid and Mahomes get to use him as a complimentary piece and move him around creatively rather than a primary target who is gonna have problems getting jammed at the LOS. I didn’t say it should have been their pick, I said it makes sense in terms of how they can use him and because they have been trying to find someone like him since Hill left and just whiffed on Skyy and Toney trying to find it.
  5. LMAO! Most people were wrong about Mahomes, but you want to bring that up to counter a point about how silly it is to fixate on Worthy because Bill clearly had other plans? But ohhhh you got me good lmao...I was one of the many people who didn't know Mahomes was gonna be one of the GOATS. But hey, I guess I suffer with that rare pesky problem of not being able to accurately predict the future 100% of the time...shame on me.
  6. I’m just saying the Worthy thing is a total non-story given we weren’t taking him and KC likely still gets him if we don’t make the trade. Worthy to Chiefs makes sense, it never at any point made sense for the Bills. So unless people expect us take guys we don’t want that don’t fit just to block KC, then there is nothing to this story unless people want to force it. It’s all good, it’s just a silly premise IMHO to force the KC narrative about a player we didn’t want and that KC very likely still gets if we don’t make the trade.
  7. Literally none of this has anything to do with Worthy and the Bills. We clearly didn’t want Worthy…and if we don’t take him, Chiefs almost certainly still get him. You are just holding on to a non story because you have KC PTSD. In other words, in your mind the correct move was the Bills to take a player they didn’t want and wasn’t a good fit just so KC doesn’t get him basically. Because UNLESS we did that there was NOTHING else to insure the Chiefs didn’t draft Worthy. So again, who cares. Coleman has had one of the best camps of any rookie of any position in the league. But hey, keep fixating on a player we passed on who made no sense for the needs of our team that has already been hurt in camp and has already been utterly destroyed at the LOS by his own teammate rather than guy we took who has already put up one of the best camps in the league and scoring rave reviews from on lookers, staff, media, and players.
  8. Why though? It’s dumb, Worthy never at any point in any reality made any sense of any kind for the Buffalo Bills. There is no rational reason he should have been our pick. In KC, they had Hollywood Brown and Rice as well as Kelce. He gets to go there as a skinny twig who only needs to be a complimentary piece, not a WR1 where he faces a high chance to struggle as a WR1 as he is gonna get destroyed by press coverage. Bills needed both a WR1 and more size in our WR room. Only people who thought the Bills should take Worthy are the people who think the 40 times are the holy grail of WR evaluation…the same 40 time he manipulated to put up that time by cutting even more weight just to try and break a record at the underwear Olympics but is not the real speed he will play at in the NFL.
  9. LMAO…21 pages about a KC Chief rookie…isn’t this supposed to be a Bills board? In all seriousness, who cares at this point about Worthy? What is even sillier is Keon has had by far the more impressive camp this far and it’s not even close. This is like “Wrong Josh” all over again where people just can’t let go Bills drafted someone different than they wanted.
  10. Puts him starting early in real doubt, which is fine and expected anyway
  11. Ok but the analogy was the least important part of my comment… point was it’s early.
  12. Way too early…I mean Nathan Peterman was chosen to start over Allen in camp.
  13. You want to take our best CB, which is our thinnest position maybe on the roster, and move him to S? No disrespect, but that is a hard pass for me
  14. Top `10 is a lock to be all QB's Top 3 would for sure be: 1 - Mahomes 2 - Allen 3 - Stroud Then it gets more eye of the beholder after that but I think the next group of 4 would be a lock to be these guys 4 - Burrow 5 - Herbert 6 - Lamar 7 - Love Then the next 3 to round out the top 10 would likely be: 8 - Caleb 9 - Dak 10 - Goff/Tua/Trevor/Richardson
  15. Hill is not a good comp, Hill is a tank and very strong, he is just short. Worthy is a stick figure, they are not at all the same players or frames. The only similarity is they both run fast, but it stops there.
  16. I haven't heard any of that and in fact lots of references of him beating guys all camp. So not sure where you are hearing that because none of the people attending camp reporting on it have mentioned he is struggling with anything.
  17. LOL...Keon has been the star of camp with highlights coming out pretty much everyday. Yet we got some people who have been down on Keon not discussing any of those plays but instead wanting to argue about one maybe being out of bounds? Ok And who cares anyway? It was still an impressive clip showcasing his ability to go get the ball and control it through the ground, if he was out of bounds then its more on where Allen put the ball than Keon anyway. But hey...if nit picking this one play amongst a reel of highlights makes you feel better about pessimistic views, then do your thang
  18. I know die hard Lions fans here in LA who still call him "Goof" instead of Goff. Its crazy to me...and for them to list him as a "miss" is just as absurd as some random exec calling Allen "overrated".
  19. Bills have not lost by more than 6 points in their past 40 games, which is now an NFL record and counting. I just thought that was pretty impressive as I wouldn't have thought that. For as much flak as Allen and especially McD can get sometimes, they both win a lot of games and when they don't they are still right there in the game. But I didn't post this to debate the merits of Allen or McD (as I am sure this will trigger some McD people lol) or anything...when I saw it made me just appreciate more what a difference it is now compared to the dark years where games were often looking bleak or out of reach by halftime. And I think some of that just gets lost in all the bickering and arguing over trivial things around here sometimes. And it is yet another reason that despite a lot of changes on both sides of the ball, there is still reason for us to be the favorites in the East and room for optimism around here. #GOBILLS
  20. Anyone watch this past weeks episode? There is a scene where they are contemplating what to do in the draft...move up for a QB or not. And in this clip, they looked at all the first round QB's over the past 10 years drafted to determine how many were a "hit or miss". Couple interesting things came from that...they had Goff as a miss while they had Daniel Jones and Kyler Murray as "hits" LMAO. Goff has played in a SB and multiple Championship games and been a lot better QB than either of those 2 guys for one. Second interesting thing was after they looked at all the first round QB's that "hit or missed" the past 10 years, they said to that list "Not a lot hit". So then the GM asks Daboll "What do you take from that Dabs?" and Dabs seems to think he asked "Who" he would take from that list...and he says "Stroud". Then someone else in the room off camera (as camera was still on Daboll) says "or Josh". Daboll didn't react to it, but to be fair, they quickly cut to a new scene at that point too. Just found this clip interesting...how they can label Goff a "miss" just was stunning. I mean I am not saying Goff is top 5...but he is far from a "miss". Then Daboll throwing out Stroud over both Mahomes and Josh was another little surprise. This is the same team that gave Daniel Jones a bunch of money though lol, so guess I shouldn't be too surprised
  21. I remember when so many people kept arguing with me that both the Giants and Broncos were "going to take a QB" when it was clear as day leading up to the draft Giants were taking Saquan and Broncos were not taking a QB and were instead all in on Chubb trying to replicate what they had that last season they won a SB with Manning where Manning was the 31st ranked QB in the NFL that year but their D and Run game carried them to a SB. They had just signed Keenum to be that game manager stable guy while they tried to elevate their very good D to elite with Chubb. Now...that just goes to show you how STUPID both the Giants and Broncos were because despite it being fairly obvious neither were taking a QB ahead of the draft, people still thought there was no way they would not take a QB...because they SHOULD have been thinking QB in what was being seen as one of the best QB drafts in the past decade at that point. While I was supremely confident both were going Saquan and Chubb...it was still mind numbingly stupid to not go QB for both of those teams.
×
×
  • Create New...