Alphadawg7

This, and it’s honestly not close IMO. Woukd I be excited if we got DK, sure, but if it’s one or the other it’s hands down Garrett.

McLaurin is better outside than Deebo, especially at this stage of their respective careers. I would expect Deebo plays much more inside than McLaurin personally

And some of us, especially me, were pounding the table to draft him in the first…then in the 2nd…then by trading back up into the 2nd. Just because teams passed on him doesn’t mean they should have. To be fair, I was fine taking Ford as we got great value (he was mostly projected to go 2nd half round 1) and looking to build the trenches for protecting your young QB is never a bad philosophy. But make no mistake about it, DK is who I wanted before the draft and at our picks or even in a trade up after we passed twice. I won a $100 bet against a fellow Bills fan who told me, and was adamant about it, that he would be a bust. We bet on over/under his yards and TDs as a rookie, had to win both to win the bet and DK did…they welched on the bet though lol.

His contract will keep him from getting traded...he will be released. If he is smart, which he is not, he would look to latch on with a legit contender. Instead, he is going to follow Rodgers because he puts playing with his buddies (and money) ahead of a SB ring. I mean he wanted to go to the lowly Raiders with mediocre at best Carr because they were besties...then he actually wanted to go to the Donald Sterling Clippers of the NFL...NY Jets...just to play with his work wife Rodgers. If he was willing to come here, sure, I would be down. Just don't think he is logical enough to make that choice, not to mention, he probably hates the idea of a spread the ball around offense given how grumpy he gets when not getting enough targets. It won't likely happen, but how funny would it be if Rodgers signed with Vegas and Adams had to go back there if he wanted to keep playing with his work wife hahaha

Haha, well to be fair I think Kurt is probably referencing how often guys get over drafted because teams fall in love with a physical gift...such as a big arm...when its not a prerequisite to be a great QB. I mean many of the best QB's in history didn't have "big arms" including QB's who have cases for GOAT like Brady and Montana.

And for this team, we have Shakir, Samuel, and our RB's who can fill those roles, so Higgins would still be a nice compliment here and he is someone I expect will be high in our Draft Rooms WR grades. I would prefer this Higgins over opening the vault of the other FA Tee Higgins personally.

Myles Garrett.

I would bet money Diggs desire to win a SB exceeds his desire to play with his brother. I am not saying he won't land in Dallas, but if he does, it may not be because it was his preferred choice, it may be his market isn't what he thought and that was the best offer he got.

And they didn't win the SB until they added an elite RB and rebuilt the defense into the #1 defense in the league...just saying

There are issues are more OL than RB talent IMHO and I don’t think a 2 down RB who benefits from Allen and a top OL here who wants to be paid more than Saquan is gonna appeal to them personally. I could be wrong, just my 2 cents

my favorite post of the offseason…nice work

The issue is this that we don’t have players to offer that make sense for Seattle. They already have two good RBs though, so they don’t need to trade for a 2 down RB, who is not great in pass pro, yet wants top of the market money. As far as Doubs goes, I agree with you on him but I think his biggest issue is wanting to have a bigger role which he probably would there replacing DK. But I also think Seattle would probably push for Wicks over Doubs. Now for us, maybe if Beane was willing to include Keon in the trade (which I doubt) we could get maybe into the game, but we still aren’t in the same league as GB in the draft pick comp with how much lower we are picking. Seattle doesn’t need a TE or RB, so Kincaid, Knox, and Cook will not have much appeal IMHO, so that leaves just picks or picks and Keon. Now you are getting pretty expensive in order to best the Packers alleged package. So not impossible, but unlikely IMHO as I can’t see us offering more than the rumored GB offer.

I have no qualms about trading for DK, although I think Garrett or Crosby does more for this team if we can only pick one. It was always a long shot for us to get DK, assuming we even tried, but if we were gonna make a big trade for someone at WR he did seem like the only possible target. But…if the Packers are gonna offer what is being stated is on the table, he’s gonna be a Packer, we won’t be able to compete with that offer and doubt anyone else will either. A quality first plus a talented young WR isn’t likely being beaten by anyone.

I voted No because I wouldnt be able to handle the never ending threads and posts of people melting down for the rest of Cooks career every time he made a reasonable or better play

Thanks and agree with everything you said too

Admittedly “everyone” was a poor choice of words, so apologies for that. I more meant those that did miss it just given that clearly Dorian is older than lots of guys who have gotten 100 tackles including former Bills players. I like Dorian, and he’s showing up in Shakirs offseason workouts that Shakir is posting on IG, so love seeing him putting the work in to keep getting better

Dude what? I was very respectful in my post to you...if you took it otherwise, then I don't know what to tell you. It was a simple suggestion and the reason I was suggesting it. Take a chill pill...and no disrespect (since you seem to be keen on taking things as if they are disrespectful)...the fact you have to keep correcting people is exactly why you should just have edited the post and made it clear as it clearly continued to cause confusion to those who aren't aware. I knew, and when I read your OP it didn't read like you knew...all you said was that "obviously its mostly defensive" when it was 100% defensive players on our list, not "mostly" and none of that suggests its because the offense hasn't reported. Most people on this board don't follow the combine to the level you seem to expect them to as football fans...I do, but the majority here don't know or follow the schedule. Really was absolutely no reason to get so rude and pissy about this dude. You do you bud, didn't realize I had to thank you for voluntarily making a post before I could make a simple suggestion to help those who don't follow the combine from getting confused.

Thank you...how did everyone miss this? It was pretty clear in how it was written that they were not referencing in NFL history.

Our issue is not that we are missing an AJ Brown, Chase, or MHJ...Chase cant even make the playoffs with Burrow and Higgins. AJ Brown didn't get back to the SB until they fixed their defense (which dominated the SB and was the #1 D this year) through the draft and added an elite RB. MHJ isn't sniffing the playoffs. Justin Jefferson, DK Metcalf, Hill, etc are not helping their teams get over any humps either. But...Chiefs are putting up an average of 35 PPG in the postseason against the Bills...despite the Chiefs going on to lose the very next game 3 times and averaging just 17 PPG. Allens stats against the Chiefs are incredible, as they are overall in the postseason. We just scored 29 against a team that had never scored 30 once this year and we still lost. We had the 16th greatest offense in NFL history and set multiple team and individual offensive records. Still lost to a team that had never scored 30 by allowing 32 points. Its our defensive efforts against the Chiefs that have lost us games...and its a combo of scheme and lack of difference makers on the defensive side of the ball. Its why we need to find a real difference maker on defense, someone who can just flip one scoring drive by getting off the field on 3rd down on sheer talent alone regardless of scheme issues. That alone would reverse our last 3 losses to KC.

Well my suggestion is you make that clear in your OP then, because the way you wrote didn't imply that info and there are several posts in here that seem to think we are intentionally meeting with D over O which is misleading and not the case.

Not sure if anyone follows Shakir on IG, but he is already doing his full offseason training and Dorian is working out with him too. Paid and still driven to be the best version of himself and great to see another young player in Dorian putting the work in too.

It was all defensive players because only the defensive players report there first and offense doesn't get there until Friday.

While Milano might get traded there is not going to be any players included in a trade for Garrett. All Cleveland will want is picks, they are crippled for 2 years by Watson contract

Hahahahaha you sir win the internet today

Ha, I didn't even see what you posted...yeah I have been beating the drum for Shakir since we drafted him, definitely wasn't me short changing him.