Alphadawg7

I was referring to your nonsense comment about beating press coverage when it was a free release and broken coverage…pay attention.

Score here…XP or go for 2?

Punt God melt down inbound

KC doesn’t win the SB last year without their all pro DT…nor reach it.

Post of the night 👏

Not really what the board said though. And he didn’t beat press coverage, he got a few release by a CB who thought he had help behind on a broken play where he didn’t even have to run fast to score.

That’s too much logic for the pitch fork and doom and gloom crowds.

Yeah, Brown was supposedly Mahomes favorite target in camp as they were clicking. But it was camp, so you never know, but sure sounded like Brown and Mahomes were forming chemistry and could factor in a lot.

Yet you’re disputing it with your own fake analysis then? Lmao Let me rephrase…In the footage available I’ve seen him struggle to get open on some plays while you are tap dancing on a broken play where the CB gave him a free release and pretending he beat press coverage which wasn’t the case. But hey, why talk to facts when you can just say what ever you want right?

Yeah on a broken play and a run where he was untouched with a convoy in front of him. What does that have to do with he has not been getting open most the game?

He has been struggling to get open most the game. So not sure I would prop up a broken play so much

I mean Kelvin Benjamin would have walked in on the same broken coverage. But I did buy Worthy in FanDuel

But TE’s don’t count as receivers

Mahomes - Overrated turnover machine 😂

Coleman catches that 😂

F Worthy…just give me a Chris Jones

Well at least Punt God screwed his first punt lol

I assume you mean wins...if so, Seattle would be my pick

Josh also often gets hit with “most turnovers”, which would only include lost fumbles but a lot people mistakenly count his non turnover fumbles and get an incorrect total. To be clear, I wasn’t arguing anything, I only asked because you hadn’t specified and I didn’t know which total that referred to.

I get that…But he was lumping it in with turnovers. If Allen loses the ball slightly on the way to the ground but regains control, it’s still a “fumble” on the stat sheet even though it was not the same level of mistake as an actual turnover is. So when totaling his “turnovers” only actual turnovers should be counted IMO.

Huh? A fumble is not a turnover if the offense does not lose possession. If Josh fumbles but recovers the ball himself or someone else on the offense recovers it like Kincaid, Dawkins, etc then it’s not a turnover nor is it counted a turnover. An interception is always a turnover. Are you saying you don’t know this?

Are those fumbles actual lost fumbles (turnovers) or is that his fumble total that includes not losing possession? I didn't check, so asking, as there is a big difference.

Hahaha...I wanted to put the laugh emoticon, but didn't want it to seem that I was mocking your post. I just legit laughed at the bolded. I do however think too much is being made of "Mack Hollins is starting" according this depth chart though. It is going to be a lot less about "starters" and more about "packages" this year to start the season at least. Keon is going to be on the field plenty and his role will only increase. Keon took every rep and snap with the ones in camp from day 1 through the end of camp. Keon started the game even when Hollins played in the 2nd preseason game. And Keon had a great camp and showed no signs of demotion or a loss in confidence by the staff. And this regime has always made the rookies earn it unless they had no choice but to play them week 1. Keon will get plenty of run on Sunday and chances to earn it.

Who thinks Hollins is better than a mediocre player? I haven't seen anyone suggesting that he is.

Sorry I should have clarified, I wasn’t agreeing and saying I expect him to have 60% of the snaps, I was saying that’s exactly what I expect to happen in terms of his snap percentage dropping as the season goes on. I personally don’t think his snap count will be that high initially.