Alphadawg7

Agree with all this...although I wouldn't go so far as say "highly" unlikely he starts Day 1. I agree the odds favor him starting the season as a backup or in specific packages, but I don't think the guys ahead of him are good enough to where he has little chance to over take them come week 1.

But I heard here he can't catch, has short arms, and is just a role player 😂

I think people are jumping to conclusions and assumptions too much off McD's comment. I think it was just a general comment pertaining to rookies more than anything. Nothing he said struck me as if he was saying that Bishop has been out of shape at any point. Could just be that Bishop maybe wasn't around the facility as much and maybe training else where and more that McD didn't know where he was at yet until he gets out there. Nothing about Bishop at any point strikes me as someone who is out of shape or would come in out of shape, so just IMO feel this comment is being made to likely be more than it is. But who knows, just the way it came across to me is all

Probably because he rents instead of owns

Meh...these happen all the time

I think this is why no one should get to up or down on anything early in camp. Lost in all the obsession of talking about the people catching passes is the fact that we are looking at a massive overhaul in our secondary this year and it will take time for them to adjust and gel. 3 of our opening day starters are gone from last year in Hyde, Poyer, and Tre...all of which were very good players for this defense both in skill and leadership. So not a surprise to see the offense eat on day 1 with a secondary whose only returning week 1 starter from last year is coming off an injury and isn't even a lock to start as he battles Elam who had a strong OTA's so will be given the chance to compete. Today was the offenses day...and there will be days it belongs to the defense like we saw in the OTA's. But...I will say how thin overall we are in the secondary is still a big concern of mine, more so at CB than anything where we don't have much behind our projected top 3 guys.

I agree that SVPG opening the season as the starter, while possible, is unlikely. McD tends to not rush rookies along when there are guys ahead of him who can start, so barring injury or a drastic issue on the interior OL rearing its head during preseason, odds are that SVPG will start the season off as a backup. However, I fully believe they love SVPG's potential and drafted him because they feel he has the potential to compete to be the future at the C position here long term. Like when they drafted Shakir to be the future of the slot position but also brought back McKenzie and Crawford so they wouldn't have to lean on a rookier early. And C is a key position with the QB at the LOS, so not having to lean on a rookie there I am sure definitely Plan A.

Guess what you won't see...any of the usual suspects here in the training camp thread liking or commenting on any of the positive news today. It is day 1, nothing will be proven or disproven with any single day of camp/practice/preseason. But to not even as a fan take in some enjoyment from seeing a positive start is the same thing they do all season long where they barely post, if at all, in a week with a big win and then all over the board flaming everything and everyone in a week with a loss. If the news today was bad, they would be ALL OVER that negative stuff in here and they know it. Whether true or not, it just comes across as an insistence on being right about their negative bias than actually really wanting to see the team/players prove them wrong. Nothing wrong with with having a negative opinion or view on any Bills topic...but maybe now that camp is open they should just put the bias and agenda in the background and smile and enjoy the good stuff when it happens too 👍

I wouldn't overlook Hollins...not only is he a credible receiver, but he brings very good blocking to the table, which is something we lost with Davis. If MVS is in that fourth spot per se, he might see more targets, but he also may see his snaps divided more with Hollins for his blocking abilities. This is why I think people are really hoping to see Claypool shine because he can bring the most to the table as a receiver and has the size and strength to also be a physical blocker. But, he clearly is coming in behind MVS and Hollins, and right fully so given he has a lot to prove and was a late addition to the team as well.

I don't know what got more beaten to death this offseason...peoples false interpretation of his speed or this mistaken notion he is just a "contested catch" type WR, which is the naysayers way of saying he is too slow to be anything else. That is a total mischaracterization of him, and it has never been about "contested catches" with Keon and that completely ignores the actual elite traits Keon brings to the table. What it is really about is CATCH RADIUS. People constantly confuse contested catches with this, they are not the same thing. Keon brings elite traits to the table of size, athleticism, body control, and hands. This isn't about giving Allen a guy who he just throws jump balls too, it gives Allen large windows of where he can put the ball out of harms way where only Keon can get to it and can make the play. This play above is exactly that, this isn't a jump ball, this is a play being made by a guy with exceptional body control to where he can get around to make the catch while keeping his feet in bounds. And the sooner people realize to not keep focusing on this false notion is just this slow guy who is only here for 50/50 balls the sooner they realize what his real potential is and how it can help Allen.

It’s early, but encouraging way to open camp especially since in past years the offense typically started slower than the defense. While it was great to see all the great tweets about the people catching passes from WR’s, TE’s and RB’s…it’s early and no pads. What I really loved coming out today was all the stuff about Brady’s offense and what it looked like. It’s exactly the kind of thing I was hoping to see. Again, it’s early and no pads, but the routes, designs, movement, etc that was being tweeted about was encouraging.

I had him as my 3rd best RB in the draft, loved landing him and can’t wait to see him in live game action in this offense

Except it’s not. You don’t know, you think. There is a massive difference. Stop selling your guesses as a fact. Brady may flame out…or he may head the best offense in the league. You dont have a clue, just your biased opinion because we didn’t draft the WR you wanted or trade for the WR you wanted so your guess is that we are doomed. But you literally have no idea how well or poor Brady will do this year, just like the rest of us. PS: You also just compared Brady, an OC, to mostly head coaches.

Have you ever not been hostile in a post before on here? Your objective in every post with everyone is to be as hostile as possible. And you misread things a lot because of it. I explained what I meant, but you do you boo 😘

I can see that, but from a target share standpoint I still think no one is projecting him to be above Rice, Kelce, and Brown.

I didn't say it was a "Fact" he is a backup...I said "projected to be a backup". The fact was clearly about the draft capital investment.

I didn't act like that...how many times are you going to mistake what I say as if I said something else? Fact: Bills turned their ONE pick at 28 into 3 players who have starter potential in Keon, Davis, and SPVG. Are you disputing that? Fact: Chiefs used their 1st and 3rd to get one player: Worthy - who is projected to be a backup WR and the 4th target for the Chiefs behind Rice, Hollywood and Kelce. I did not say the Bills got all the picks from KC, I said that is what Buffalo turned their one 28th pick into as OPPOSED to just drafting Worthy at 28...you know the ONLY way to assure that KC didn't draft him. And then I showed the amount KC invested to actually get him. So we took 1 first round pick and turned it into multiple picks to get 3 potential starters...they used 2 premium picks to get 1 backup WR. That was the point.

I mean, Worthy is a lot thinner than Devonta. Devonta isn't big, but he has a sturdier and thicker frame than Worthy who really is one of the thinnest WR's I have seen in a long time. Nor is Worthy the same level of prospect coming out as you mentioned. He isn't an elite deep threat though...he is a rookie with potential to be one, but he has not established that at all yet. Also, KC's game is not the deep ball anyway, they pass more near or behind the LOS than most anyone in the league going back to when Hill was even there. And nobody likes seeing a rival get weapons, agreed. But also, who cares, that is outside of our control and pointless to dwell on it. Who they draft is on them, it is not our GM's job to take players lower on his board and draft them to keep them from being drafted by a rival. His job is to draft the players he feels are the best options for the team for what they are looking for based on their scouting and final board. The only way to keep Worthy from KC was to draft him, and clearly we didn't want to draft him or would have. And look at this way...Beane literally turned the 28th pick into Keon Coleman, Ray Davis, and SPVG. Chiefs turned their 32nd and 3rd round pick into just Xavier Worthy. I would take Keon, Davis, and SPVG...3 players who not only could see big roles this year, but all have long term starter potential over a stick figure framed WR whose probably more a WR2 or WR3 in the NFL than he is a lead WR1. So worrying about who KC drafted is a waste of energy IMHO. Especially for a team who has a poor track record with WR's lately.

To directly answer this question, yes I do. Like anyone, its just a guess though as so much is new as we all know. I think the better quesion is...Do I think it means a whole lot...no I don't. 2 guys around 900 yards in a 17 game season with Josh Allen does not at all sound far fetched...nor impressive. I am only discussing it because this 2 in the top 32 thing has taken on a life of its own the last handful of pages here. Well that has more to do with the target distribution and group makeup where Cole lost a step, Gabe was splitting time for a couple years, Kincaid arrived to divide the non Diggs targets further, etc. And remember it is 241 targets to redistribute just from Diggs and Davis. I do agree with you about this. Which is why I am kind of just like why all this wasted energy about 2 guys in the top 32...that doesn't really mean much, it won't take much to make happen most likely based on the 3 year averages to do so since going to 17 game seasons. So if you were to ask me...yes I do think we will have 2 in the top 32. But I also think that tells me nothing about the quality of our offense. If one guy has 1250 yards, and another has 1075 yards...odds are, we might still have a pretty good offense. But if that was we had one guy get 907 yards and another 892 yards with the other guys lagging further behind in the 300-600 range...well then I think the offense is not going to be good enough because we won't likely have a D like KC had last year to be able to still win a SB with the offense they had.

How many of you watched the show "Receiver" yet on Netflix? If you haven't, go watch like the first 3 episodes. Go look at the pain Kittle, Davante, Deebo, and St. Brown are in off routine and regular hits who are all considerably stronger and bigger than Worthy. Go see what it really is like for receivers in the NFL on a daily basis...it gives you great insight. Then ask yourself if Worthy's light frame is going to be physical enough to not only play within that physicality but also endure it. It is a real question mark for him. Worthy got to go to a place where he can be WR3 behind the bigger guys of Kelce and Rice. In Buffalo, we were more shopping for a potential WR1 and a guy who can bring some size and toughness to the outside spot as the other top 2 guys were Shakir and Samuel, neither seen as big enough to be primarily on the outside. So I just don't get how people can't see the difference between how one situation may good for said player, but that doesn't mean every situation would have been either. PS: It is also just pads and shorts, we have seen guys who don't make our rosters or play very little if they do make eye popping plays in shorts here...it doesn't mean a lot at this stage.

Couple of things...I have been seeing this whole "top 32" conversation going on for a while amongst multiple posters since one certain poster introduced it. But what does it take to be in the top 32 on average? Last 3 years (prior to that it was 16 game seasons, so only last 3 years are equal comparisons) In 2023, the 32nd was Rice with 938 and 31st was Hockenson with 960 (Kelce, who was referenced with Rice had 984 at 29th) In 2022, the 32nd was Donovan People Jones with 839 and 31st was Mark Andrews with 847 In 2021, the 32nd was Jakobi Meyers with 866 and 31st was AJ Brown with 869. That means the average yardage needed over the past 3 seasons for 2 players to finish in the top 32 is 881 yards (32nd) and 892 (31st) Ok...now we actually know what needs to happen to have "2 top 32" players. So do you really think that the Bills having 2 players finish above 881 yards is that implausible this year while Josh Allen is the QB of this franchise? Diggs and Davis alone ate up 241 targets by themselves last season. With those facts, the following still occured: Kincaid has the 4th most receptions (73) and 10th most yards (673) for a rookie TE in NFL history...and he missed a game last year. Shakir put up 611 yards on just 38 rec on only 45 targets...and he was barely used first third of the season. So those 2 returning targets are now going to see a decent chunk of those 241 departed targets. Kincaid - He only needs 208 more yards (and that is before you factor in him missing a game last year) this year to hit that min average to be in the top 32. Shakir - He only needs 270 more yards to do the same this year. Which of those above is crazy? Not only is neither crazy, but I would argue that its both plausible and expected that Kincaid should put up another 200+ yards this year min with the increased targets he will see. And same for Shakir because no one expects him to be seeing only 45 targets again and it is quite possible his targets double or more this season. So is 270 more yards for him really that much a stretch of the imagination? Additional facts about the current group: Samuel last time under Brady and with a bad QB put up 77 rec and 851 yards (in a 16 game season, meaning in a 17 game season he would have been top 32) Keon is a better prospect than Gabe Davis was coming out of college, yet Davis put up 600 yards as a rookie who wasn't a full time starter. So if Keon starts all year, is putting up 280 more yards than Gabe did as a rookie that much an impossibility? We have Josh Allen. I don't need to list all his accolades as a QB, we can all agree he is elite. Everything is an opinion right now...but I don't get why this "top 32" convo has become such a big deal here, it means we had 2 guys roughly around 880-900 yards. We have 2 ascending players who don't need much of an expanded role to hit those, we have 2 guys who have done it already before in Samuel and Claypool as well to factor in, and a promising Rookie where getting to 900 yards for a starting rookie WR isn't a crazy thought on its own right. How anyone can talk like this is some impossibility is beyond me. Is it a sure thing...nope...but I do think its more plausible than not. This I agree with...I don't trust our defense the way KC's defense played for them last year as one of the best in the league and Chris Jones literally closed out multiple playoff games for them including ours and the Super Bowl.

No disrespect, but those 3 coaches signed deals with GM powers, they are not an example of any kind to a traditional HC and GM role. If Head Coaches had that kind of control then Carrol, Belichick, and Parcells wouldn't have to have it put in their contracts as part of their roles. Andy Reid also had GM powers in Philly as part of his contract, and it is why he got fired because he was a terrible GM and when he was out looking for another job he had to make clear he was not going to need GM powers again or he wouldn't have gotten hired. And currently, Belichick has had to do the same, to make clear he is not searching for a job where he is both HC with GM powers again because he is not seen as a good GM. McD has final say on the field, and Beane has final say on personnel. Not only is this contractually their relationship, they both have at length talked very open about it over the years. Still have doubts, well there is hours of draft room footage over the years that confirm it is Beane's show. Everyone is entitled to their opinion of course, but honestly not really sure this is an opinion situation, it just isn't the case with McD and Beane.

Respectfully disagree. McD is not the GM for one and two Beane traded up for multiple offensive players including Allen, Kincaid, and Diggs (he gave up our first and a fourth, the equivalent of trading up). And “trading out of round 1” sounds worse than moving back 1 spot. The fact it changes rounds doesn’t change the fact it was only 1 spot. And everyone knew who Carolina was after, the home town Legette, it was the worst kept secret of the draft. So there was no risk going back one spot. And as already been discussed many times, and Beane has said so himself, they made a small move back because they had multiple players they liked and were assured they still get one. It doesn’t mean they don’t prioritize the position or offense. - 3 of our last 5 drafts our top pick was on a weapon for Allen. - 4 of our 6 first and 2nd round picks have been offense the past 3 drafts. - Since we began to rebuild around Allen in 2019, looking at our first 4 picks of each draft, 15 of the 24 were offense. No disrespect bud, but I mean what more do you want? 100% focus early all offense each draft and try and find defense only on day 3?

Don't forget Bills also used a 1st and 4th to acquire a WR in his prime in Diggs. So in 3 of the past 5 drafts the Bills used their first pick in the draft on a receiving weapon for Josh. So my person opinion is that I just do not believe at all they had expected to replace both Diggs and Davis in one offseason. First, they extended him with a big extension...then last offseason they restructured him making him difficult to trade because of the massive cap hit, so their actions clearly support that IMO. But, between the fresh start preferred by what sounds like by both sides, and the fact Beane was able to get a lot more for Diggs now vs later, they moved up the moving on from him a season and pulled the trigger now. Especially after Brady came in and turned the season around where Diggs was leaned on a lot less.

Let me clarify...I was saying the initial problem is Hollis, he is who he is directly coming in behind so the first sign of progress would be to move ahead of him. I mean wherever Claypool moves up to it still pushes Hollis down as now you have 4 guys ahead of him in Keon, Shakir, Claypool, and Samuel. So that would make Hollis more of a WR5 which would mean he is probably more of a blocking and ST specialist as anyone that far back probably isn't getting many targets. First thing I will say there is one thing I am supremely confident about is that they aren't going to play Keon just because of his draft status. They have proven that many times now. But I do agree they see him as a big contributor this year and he is coming in as its his job to lose right now vs having someone ahead of him he has to take the job from. But...the guy I think Claypool is competing against to get starter level involvement is more Samuel. With Shakir in the slot and Keon at the X, that leaves Samuel to maybe have to play more outside than he probably should potentially. So I think that is where his best opportunity is, to get on the field more in that outside role opposite Keon and make Samuel more of a swiss army knife that can spell the guys outside and Shakir inside while also taking some snaps in the backfield.