Alphadawg7

That’s two missed TDs to Hollins on this drive. Can’t must keep giving away 4 points

Yeah agree, it’s gone from being patient to concerned at this stage. He was abused last week too and it cost us drives and points

He had Hollins for a TD ugh there on the post

If we could just stop beating ourselves

This is gonna set up the passing game

This is what we needed to the OL to do…and it’s got Cook Cookin now

Yeah, too bad too as Coleman held Stingley in while Cook beat his man on that wheel with no help over the top. It’s like the play last week when Coleman torched his one on one for a would be TD but O’Cyrus got abused and gave up a sack. We need the OL of the first 3 weeks to come to play today with us short handed today on offense

That’s how you bounce back defense from last week

Allen had Cook for a TD on that 3rd down play on a wheel route down the left sideline.

We needed a new thread for old news?

This thread is aging like fine gas station wine in a box 😂

Instant #1 WR? Lol

At least all the Texans RBs are still sitting out and may sit again forcing them to use Akers again who doesn’t scare anyone.

Yet these kinds of trades do happen all the time where a player either is a FA the year after, or has a contract where they will be a clear cut. And I mean Texans just did that with Diggs giving us a second and voiding all future years of his deal. Rams won a SB doing it. That’s the point, it’s an all in move to win it all that year.

Step one of your conspiracy theory is a go lol…Shakir ruled out.

McD confirmed both are out. Well now if they can’t find a way to get Samuel going this week then they may never get him going.

Nah he’s not likely going to get traded until he shows he’s recovered from his hammy issue. I would guess it’s going to be at least another week before that happens.

He’s 32…why would they restructure what is an awful deal where even a restructure would be a ton of money tied to a then 33 old WR? His deal isnt guaranteed after this year, he’s gonna get cut and signed to a more reasonable deal for a 33 year old WR. But he would also be a FA and free to sign wherever too and for the most money if that’s what he wanted again. Adams is even already assumed to be one of the FA WRs next year because everyone knows Raiders were going to have to cut him after this season based on his deal.

I’m guessing he doesn’t get traded until he recovers from his hammy injury

Anyone post this yet?

Unfortunately Jets would never risk pairing Wilson with Allen for Allens prime years. But I would also make that trade Yeah no chance Wilson is traded if they acquire Adams, then whats the point of getting Adams. I cant see Jets trading Wilson regardless either though

Adams is gone after this season. We arent paying 34.5M a year for next 2 years. Its a half season rental. So trading for him if he isnt going to get us over the hump is a waste of draft assets that could have been used to draft a WR to be here 4 years on a rookie deal. You only make the trade for Adams if you are certain it puts you legitimately into serious contention to win the SB. Against the Ravens we were not a Davante Adams away from winning that game. But you also can't base it on one game. So I think Beane will more likely wait and see what this team does next couple weeks before he knows if Adams gets us to the big dance or not. If not, its a waste of time.

I think it is too early for Beane to know if this team is worth going all in on for one player. We looked elite 3 weeks and laid a dud our first big test. I think its more likley Beane will see how this team plays a couple more games before he can feel confident or not that going all in on one player could get us over the hump this year. But...what is working in our favor are 3 things: We looked unreal the first 3 weeks. Our dud game was a collective dud effort top to bottom...players both sides of the ball and coaches. I don't think everyone believes we are as bad as the team played against the Ravens. Most important - The top of the AFC does not look as daunting as it did in the preseason. KC may be the most vulnerable they have been with the losses they have taken too and don't seem to be a player on bringing in any significant help. Bringing in another WR does not mean they give up on the "everybody eats" moto. That isn't flawed, Josh should be looking to find the open man each play and not force feeding any WR on the field we would trade for. Like everyone, I badly want a Super Bowl. My stance is lets see what this team can do these next couple weeks. If we roll Texans and Jets I will be more for going all in on a player this year if it really looks like we can get over the hump. If we don't appear to be a player away, then I don't want to see us create more cap issues or lose premium pick(s) on a short aging rental. Exception - If Budda Baker is available, I am all for getting him regardless as he would be more than a short term rental as he is still 28 and one of the best safeties in football.

This was by far the best thing he said so far...he cooked Baker 😂