Alphadawg7

Hunt is absolutely worth a 3rd and our 2nd is practically a third. If we can do the trade for our third, even better. Just saying I would give up as much as our 2nd this year for those 2 in a trade. Or even better send either Moss or Devin and our 5th for Hunt. All I really want is Hunt, but Njoku would also be a great get if we can get him in a package. Or offer Devin or Moss plus our 5th and see if they bite, at least on Hunt. Hunt is young and a complete RB. As a full time starter he would be a perennial top 5 RB for the next 4 years. Especially on a dynamic offense like us. I like Moss and Devin, but they are just not in the same class as Hunt as either a runner or receiver. Just adding Hunt alone puts us neck and neck with KC, if not the favorite to represent the AFC in the SB next year. Especially with all the OL question marks KC Shaw to fill still.

I would give the Browns our 2nd round pick for BOTH Hunt and Njoku. I mean our 2nd rounder this year is only 2 picks earlier than what Tyrod was traded for. It’s practically a 3rd rounder. Id do this in a heartbeat.

I still think a trade is very much possible, as well as a quality veteran in FA at an affordable price once the top range gets over paid.

Then again, what you just said isn’t the way it happened either...so there’s that too. Again, people need to reread the facts.

Never ever would I have thought Jonnu would get that much. Major over pay IMO, and now the TE market may have just gotten a lot more expensive at the top of the FA group than even expected. My guess has always been that if we make a move at TE it was more likely Beane would trade a 5th for someone like Ertz, Howard or Njoku...or wait until the FA market settles and then target a veteran who can help develop Knox more.

Wow that a lot of money for him. Not good to see the TE market opening this high.

GO GET HUNT! And people need to get over the previous incident that was grossly sensationalized by the media and twisted to make a young athlete look as bad as possible because that is what gets clicks. People need to go review the facts of what really happened to refresh their memory. In every other sense, the kid has been well behaved and a good teammate. He made a poor decision to put himself in a bad position with a woman who clearly was set on instigating an altercation. Did he make a bad choice, ABSOLUTELY. Could he have handled it better? ABSOLUTELY. But at the same time, he was a young kid and put in a situation where someone was clearly working to force an altercation, even calling him the N word and she also initiated the physical altercation with his group after she refused to leave despite being told to leave by multiple people in the group. I don’t think Hunt should continue to have this follow him. He made a mistake and has paid the price and learned from it.

And more importantly, a GM who knows how to manage the cap...And Beane has mastered it.

He was...we don’t know what he will be after his injury. Hasn’t anyone learned from AZ, Dallas, Jets, etc? You don’t pay a RB big money. You can get away with it while your QB is on a rookie deal, but you can’t spend big on a RB when you’ve got a top end WR, franchise QB, and OT’s to pay. If we give up a second for Barkley, and he comes here and had a big year, he will demand a big contract next year that we can’t afford, essentially making him a 1 year rental. If he doesn’t have a big year, well maybe he can sign for less, but that sounds like we wasted a second round pick then. Why not just draft someone in the first or second like who isn’t hurt and will be on a rookie deal for 4 years as well? Or sign one of the many good FA RBs where we get them without trading a 2nd and also won’t be a huge cap hit to have him here more than one year.

Ok...it’s not so much you proposing the idea of Saquon...it’s the idea of you proposing we send a 2nd round pick for him which would be crazy. That’s just a lot to invest on a guy coming off a major injury like that. I’d rather use our first or second round pick on a RB on a rookie deal. Barkley is either going to be a one year rental (and first year back from an ACL is almost always a down year from their pre-injury production) or cost a lot to keep, money we don’t have to spend. Spend big on a QB, WR, and OL...no where else on offense. Plus there are much cheaper options in free agency too that won’t cost a 2nd round pick if they wanted to add another veteran RB.

Boom! Beane I love you. I honestly didn’t think this was going to happen, felt he was just gonna get an offer we wouldn’t match in FA. Now that LB isn’t the huge hole I expected, I wonder what’s next? I wouldn’t be surprised if it was him trading for a TE...Ertz, Njoku, or Howard/Brate.

AJE and Gabe Davis I think both break out. AJE flirts with double digit sacks and Davis flirts with 1000 yards. If we can adequately fix the holes/issues in the trenches of the DL then Ed Oliver becomes a major candidate for a breakout. We need beef to eat some blockers.

Couldn't agree more, and honestly, its pretty indisputable really.

Wrong. Evidence says that 100% proof Cousins was not worth being paid the most in NFL history, which is what he was wanting from WFT. Not my argument at all...you clearly are missing the point. Its comical to see you arguing to me that WFT would be a better team right now had they paid Cousins the richest contract in NFL history when they were not a good football team when they had him.

Who cares though...I mean Washington keeping Cousins and instead going say 25-23 wouldn’t be any better. No one plays for regular season wins, they play for Championships. I will take the current WFT roster and cap situation right now over the Cousins led one 100 times over and so would just about anyone else. I didn’t say Washington was good at it. Just because they didn’t have a good enough front office doesn’t make it wrong. I do think their staff is better now and that roster is up and coming with some really good young talent. Outside of QB, it’s a better roster and better cap situation. And let’s not forget the QB carousel also happened due to bad luck of a horrific leg injury to the guy who was supposed to hold the position for a little bit. And that same guy after almost losing his leg came in this year and made WFT a better team when he was on the field and a tough out despite people saying he would never play again.

Count me in as I have been saying it all offseason when people feel panicked about getting a big name DE. I always point out three things: 1 - We were 6th in the NFL at pressuring the QB. 2 - Undersized interior DL a much bigger issue IMO and Star is king if unknown after missing a year. 3 - AJE really started to come on and flash as the season wore on and would be best to get him heavily into the rotation after spending a 2nd on him and seeing him start to develop. I actually expect him to start this year over Addison. He is a big reason I’m less concerned about DE than I am about DT, LB (if Milano leaves) and DB opposite Tre.

I mean no disrespect at all, I enjoy you as a poster and respect you, but this reply here couldn’t be less relevant to what I’ve been saying and what we’ve been discussing. I mean literally my entire point has been that sometimes it’s better to get worse so you can get better versus just committing to mediocrity for the sake of winning a few more regular season games.

And bringing this back to Dak, I am more against the bad contracts of Cooper and Zeke than Dak. I get why they paid Dak his money and he is a top 10 QB prior to injury. I still don’t love paying Dak, and missing out on locking him up at $32M was just yet another Cowboys blunder. I do have concerns that Dak can’t carry a team the way other top guys could. And I think Dallas is going to struggle to seriously contend during his next 4 years. As far as Minnesota goes, I don’t blame Minnesota for taking a chance on him to try and get to the next level, which at the time meant serious SB run. Most my talk was about why Washington didn’t pay him and used how Minnesota didn’t get any better with him as evidence as to why they were right not to pay him.

Whats his Peloton say?

But Cousins is not a top 10 QB...so again, I don't see how you are using the comparison. And the previous comment you are replying about in terms of me saying its never been done, I posted my actual quote above where I said "mid-tier" QB, not a top 10 QB which can be anyone from the 6th best to 10th best guy. For example, paying say the 7th best QB as top 3 isn't a gross over pay and not what I was referencing. I am talking about when teams over commit to guys like a Kap, Tannehill (in Miami), or Cousins. This is why I dont really understand why you are using Eli here in either discussion regarding that comment or Cousins.

Bummed to see Brown go, mad respect to him and will always root for his continued success except when facing us. Cant say it wasn't unexpected, although I had hoped Beane would find a way to restructure him to be able to stay.

He was a 4th year QB already in the top 10 in the league on his way to a what might end up being a HOF career. I mean he is the 8th leading passer in NFL history. I am not even sure why you are trying to argue him here. I mean, his contract was not out of whack to who he was as a player back then and he was still getting better and finished as a 2 time SB MVP and Winner, 8th all time in passing, and 9th all time in TD's. And he led the Giants to the playoffs 3 times and a Super Bowl Championship with a SB MVP in his first 4 seasons. I mean he was 5th in the NFL in passing his second year, which was his first year as a 16 game starter and made the playoffs each of his first 3 seasons as a 16 game starter and one SB win and SB MVP. Sorry...how again is his contract out of whack, which was a rookie contract to begin with? I just can't see how this is an example to refute what I said about paying mid tier guys top end money never working. 4th overall pick to SB MVP in 4 seasons while making the playoffs all 3 seasons as the full time starter is a pretty darn good start to a career. I mean even in his rookie year, Kurt Warner couldn't even keep the kid on the bench who went on to have some more excellent season in AZ after that.

First off, Cousins cap hit on the franchise tag was going to be $34M and he was seeking near that kind of money from the Redskins. Cousins team wasn't going to budge with them and this went on for 2 seasons. So Alex Smith contract was quite a bit cheaper than what Cousins was willing to sign for in Washington. Second, no one believed at any point that Washington saw Alex Smith as a long term answer and the contract wasn't a long term commitment. They had just made the playoffs and wanted to bring a vet in to keep winning. They GROSSLY overpaid for Smith when you factor in compensation in the trade at the time to get him and the contract, even though the cap hit was much lower than what Cousins wanted. And once again...grossly over paying for a QB (Smith in this case) again did NOT work out...just like Cousins has not propelled Minnesota anywhere further either and now have had the rest of the roster start to deteriorate with cap issues.

Exactly, they felt Alex Smith was better option than Cousins for that roster. They felt they could keep winning with Smith on a shorter deal and then draft a young guy behind him to eventually take the reigns. I wasn't saying letting Cousins go was the beginning of the rebuild even though it eventually led to it directly due to injuries and roster decisions. I used Buffalo as the direct example of a GM coming in and despite a playoff birth, committing to tearing down the roster and rebuilding the cap early on.

If I am being honest, this is not a fair comparison or example. Eli had that cap hit because that was before rookie contracts were changed and capped after the JaMarcus Russel disaster in 2007 (The year Eli won his first SB) finally smartened the league up from giving top picked QB's monster contracts right out of college. And in 2007, he wasn't one of the top few players paid in the league. He got his biggest contract in 2009 after winning a Super Bowl and SB MVP, something he would do twice as well (second one 2 years later in 2011). And the year he won the Super Bowl in 2011 for the Giants as among the leagues highest paid, he was the 4th leading passer in the NFL and played to his contract level. Not to mention in both Super Bowl runs, he put up 15TDs to just 2 INTs in those 8 games with nearly a 100 QB rating. Kirks postseason production is not close to that. Plus, Eli is a borderline HOF QB...I personally wouldn't vote for him, but hes absolutely going to get consideration for the HOF and could possibly eventually get in. Kirk is no where near that conversation. And Eli was either in the top 10 or at least in the top 10 conversations through a lot of his career too. He finished his career 8th all time in passing yards and ninth all time in Touchdowns. So while I get why you mention him, and its a good reply overall, it still does not refute what I said earlier about that strategy never working. Eli was playing to the level of his contract when they won those SB's.