Alphadawg7

And D-HOP is substantially better than Davis. SO....Diggs, DHop and Sherfield are a massive upgrade to what we had last year. Our 3rd outside WR last year was Kumerow and Sherfield is a lot better than him too. So what I said is correct. If we traded Davis as part of a trade to get Dhop, our top 3 outside WRs of Diggs, DHop and Sherfield are significantly better than the trio of Diggs, Davis and Kumerow last year. And its not even close.

With the 22nd pick in the 2023 NFL Draft, the Baltimore Ravens select: WR, Quentin Johnston, TCU CLICK HERE FOR HIGHLIGHTS We are thrilled to add another weapon to our WR room, especially given the recent assault allegations that have arisen against OBJ shortly after he signed here. Quentin brings a big target and size to this team and someone we can believe can be a true WR1 here for us. He is a good route runner for someone his size and knows how to create separation. We are excited to see him along side OBJ and Andrews giving our offense a whole new dimension it has been lacking in recent years. @Big Blitzand the Vikings are now on the clock

With the 21st pick in the 2023 NFL Draft, the Los Angeles Chargers select: WR, Jordan Addison, USC CLICK HERE FOR HIGHLIGHTS With our targets at TE and CB off the board, we turn our focus on infusing more youth and playmakers into our offense with Addison. Giving Justin another weapon like Addison who excels as a route runner and can play all over the field was just too good to pass up here. We are thrilled to still have our duo of Willams and Allen for him to learn the game from and know he Addison's presence on the field will only help their games as well. Next up are Alphadawg7 and the Baltimore Ravens.

DIGGS, DHop, and Sheffield outside is a massive upgrade to what we had outside last year. We definitely could include Gabe if they wanted in a trade that landed DHop. And we would still be able to draft another WR if we wanted to say in the mid rounds. Like nab someone with high upside like Boutte from LSU in round 4 as just one example.

I agree on where Charbonnet likely goes and I think it’s a close grade between him and Roschon personally. I personally prefer Roschon for his versatility though

Pats missed playoffs in a 16 game season after winning 11 games too. It is going to be very important we win our division and that starts and stops with us winning our divisional games. We should go 2-0 vs Pats, no explanation needed. We should have been 3-0 vs fins last year (2 with Tua), but we know the extreme circumstances that had to occurred for his drop the first one (barely). So I think we will go 2-0 against them this year. Jets though, hard to say until we see Rodgers on the field with them. If we get them early at least one game, I think we get that one as it’s gonna take some time for all the prices to likely gel. So I think 1-1 here is a reasonable expectation if we assume Rodgers plays well. If we can handle business and go 5-1 in the division, then I don’t see us losing the division. 4-2 would make things a lot closer but could still get it done. Im not worried as much about the games outside the division, at least not the tough ones because our divisional rivals play them too. So that I think works itself out

I also would much prefer the 3rd, just saying I wouldn't be upset if he ended up being the pick in the 2nd because I don't think he makes it to us in the 3rd. Or maybe we trade up from our 3rd to get him too, I would be ok with that as well.

As the draft approaches, my love affair for Roschon has only increased. I can't shake what an ideal fit he would be in Buffalo and his stock is only continuing to rise to the point now that I think he very well could go day 2 in the 2nd round. It wouldn't surprise me if he was the 3rd or 4th RB off the board. And that being said, if he was there in the 2nd at 59, I honestly would not be upset if we took him that early because I think he is going to be that good and an excellent pairing with Cook as a tandem for the next few years. I had hoped to get him in the 3rd, but I think there is a solid chance he is gone before that pick.

I don’t disagree, my point was only that there is a lot of chatter about Texans being enamored with him. That includes my friend in Texas who’s got a close connection to the Texans and said he’s heard the same down there. He’s actually pissed about the idea of them taking a RB too ha. He is hoping it’s just a smoke screen to hide who they really want or to try and entice someone to move up. But as far as he has heard, the interest is allegedly legiti.

Oh man, hope things are all good bud. Wishing you a speedy recovery brother!

Agreed on the above To put your post into simpler terms...it's not very realistic for the Bills this year.

I think this has more chance to be a reality on draft day than some think. Lot of smoke that the Texans are enamored with Bijan and with that staffs background, it would make sense.

Yeah, and they didn't really even really utilize them a lot together, and honestly those teams probably should have too. Sherfield is better than people think too, and I think he is gonna run more as the 3rd WR if we didn't draft or trade for another WR. Personally, I think we are going to still draft one though. So yeah, I agree, just don't see how Cole would ever make it back on this roster unless there was some sort of injury situation during the season when there are few options out there and he has familiarity with the offense and QB.

The Ravens didn't have a 2 TE pass attack though, that offense was built on dual RB combo of Jamaal Lewis and Priest Holmes that also used Shannon Sharpe predominantly when throwing to a TE. That team was built on their defense that broke the 85 Bears defensive scoring record and grinding down teams by running the ball. The Patriots did briefly utilize a heavy dose of 2 TE sets in the passing game, but they lost the only SB they made with that offense 21-17 to the Giants. Honestly it hasn't happened in the modern era the way people are suggesting we would run it if we drafted a TE round 1. And totally agree...just because it hasn't been done doesn't mean it can't be done. But look at the flip side of that. We have an offense that is 2nd only to KC in total points scored over the past 3 seasons, a difference of only 10 points by the way. Allen who has excelled in a spread em out downfield attack, who specifically wanted Dorsey because he had been here and could keep running a similar offense. Dorsey is just a 2nd year OC who already has a lot of areas to work on from his first year debut. So for me, I just think this notion we will go away from 3+ WR sets in heavy favor of a 12 personnel offense is a bit unrealistic. I mean that is a lot to ask of a 2nd year OC to completely redesign his offense into one he has never run as an assistant or coach on any level. And it would be different style than what our elite QB wanted and is comfortable in. If we do take a TE early, which is possible with the varying ways the draft could fall, then I think what is more likely to happen is we will see some 12 personnel inserted in situational play calling but won't see some fundamental switch to featuring 2 TE's like some keep suggesting.

Not trying to throw shade at anyone here, but honestly there is nothing at all leading to this conclusion other than assumptions and speculation by posters if we were to draft a tight end in round 1. But just being honest, there is no evidence that we are going to run less 3 WR sets next year. In fact you could argue it’s just the opposite. Bills not only signed multiple new WRs already, they have explored interest in OBJ and Hopkins and shown a heavy interest in WRs early in this draft. All of which points to interest in continuing to run a lot of 3+ WR sets. It’s possible they take a TE in round 1 or 2, it’s a weird draft and if a TE is BPA at those spots Beane has shown to stay true to his board. And while that could lead to using some 2 TE sets in certain situations, it wouldn’t automatically indicate a fundamental shift in Dorsey’s offense and a big reduction to 3+ WR sets.

Yes, you assumed correctly, but didn’t do that to “eliminate” Redskins as they didn’t run the same type of offense that people are assuming we would convert to if we took a TE in the first.

He is not necessarily wrong, but he isn't for sure right either. Based on only last year, he could certainly say that. But what does he have left a year later and over a full season is a real question? And where will Shakir be at in his growth come week 1 is also an unknown. Until Shakir proves it on the field, hard to say Cole is wrong. However, I prefer sticking with the youth and seeing what Shakir can do, or even a rookie if we draft someone to compete for the starting slot WR spot with Shakir. But Cole could still start on many teams IMO this season as a quality slot WR.

I think some of you grossly underestimate how big of a change that would be. NFL Offensive Coordinators are not known for just scrapping their entire offensive style and moving to a totally different offense design in an off season. Usually the team just fires the OC and then goes and hires the OC that runs the system they want to change to who has proven success running that style of offense. If we had a good 2nd TE, would we incorporate some more 2 TE sets...sure...but to expect its going to be a main focal point is a bit unrealistic. And I will point this out again to everyone so keen on running a heavy dose of 12 personnel...no team has ever won the SB building its offense off 12 personnel and 2 TE sets.

While I don't think he will go in the first round, I do think Downs could end up being the best WR to come out of this draft when we look back in 3-5 years. 27 feels early for him, but I also do not think he reaches us in the 2nd either. For the record, I am think Shakir has good potential and was high on him last draft. However, like I have said in other threads, despite being optimistic about Shakir, it would be hard to not get excited about someone as electric as Downs.

Facts are facts, Jets (on paper at least) just got a lot better and have to consider them a contender if Rodgers maintains a high level of play. Packers did a good job holding out and getting a lot for Rodgers. At least the Jets had to surrender some decent draft capital for a guy who is no lock to play again next year and costs an obscene amount of money annually. Expected, don't love it, but at least it is more of a short term problem given Rodgers age and flirtations with retirement every year now. I still think the Bills can and will win the division, but the AFCE may now be the best division in football. So winning the division is going to be no easy task and neither will the number 1 seed in the AFC.

Im on the same page, in no way do I want them to reach. Which is why I won't be upset regardless of how it plays out, I trust Beane won't reach and will take who they feel is the BPA when they pick at 27 or if they trade up or down from 27.

Personally, I think its unlikely. I do think 2 RB's are going to go in first with Bijan and Gibbs, but for this to be true only 1 WR would have to go round 1. And I have a hard time seeing less than 2 WR's go round given the number of teams that need a WR this year, especially in the back half of the draft. At the same time, it wouldn't be totally shocking either if only 1 WR went given the wide varying degree of how people feel about the WR's. Kind of reminds me of the year DK Metcalf came out where there were a lot of guys that could be first rounders, then many fell to the 2nd round.

I don't personally think he will be drafted in the first round, but I do think he has some serious upside and has the potential to be the best WR to come out of this draft when we look back in 3-5 years. Shakir is someone I like a lot and believe has a lot of potential still. But if we ended up with Downs in the 2nd, it would be hard to not get very excited.

For the record, I am the last person you should say that to. Go pull up any thread on any player drafted on draft night and you will not find a single post made by me flipping out telling people the pick was terrible. If we draft someone I didn't expect (like Bernard last year, Boogie, etc) the first thing I do is try and learn more about the player and look for the optimism that our Front Office might have saw to make the pick. Not the other way around, so you are way off base here. Worse yet, I have said I expect us to draft a TE, and we should. I even said I would be fine if the board fell where the BPA was a TE at 27 and Beane stuck true to his board. I even said that I am always for taking the talent, and if a TE was the clear BPA I would be fine with it. Honestly, this is where I exit the convo. You are just way too defensive to the point you are towing the line of dragging this into the mud for no reason and now just making baseless rants when I all I was doing was politely discussing your mock with you. If you can't handle open polite open discussion about your mock, maybe don't subject yourself to other opinions by posting a mock draft thread. All good...GoBills

No disrespect, but you just told @newcam2012he is making a lot of assumptions, but then followed that up with a bunch of assumptions like "Q. Johnson is just a Gabe Davis clone" and "the first LB doesn't come off the board until pick 48". The Gabe Davis comparison just feels like a lazy assumption given they are not really that similar in how they play nor are they anywhere near the same kind of prospect coming out of college. More importantly, you realize that this is most likely the last year we have Davis who there is very little chance they pay what he can get in Free Agency next season to keep him right? Having an opportunity to draft a WR at 27 that has WR1 potential has a lot of value, especially considering the alternative is a 2nd string TE who might only get 20-30 targets at most behind Knox. And no disrespect, but you can't defend not taking a LB at 27 by saying "I gave you one at 59". When deciding who to pick at 27 it is not known who will be there at pick 59, so that is a completely irrelevant statement to what decision should be made while actually deciding who the pick should be at 27. You seem a bit defensive about your mock, and you shouldn't be, especially given all mocks are wrong. But I think the point you are missing from those who have a differing opinion, is that they doubt we are going to prioritize a second TE over some of the other guys you still had on the board in your mock. Doesn't matter at all who you mocked to us in the 2nd, its about what choice would be best while sitting on the clock at 27. Personally, I think they would take the WR in Johnston in your mock, but I could also see them taking someone else at OL, LB, or DL there too over a TE. Not saying a TE is impossible at 27, because if he is the clear cut BPA then I expect Beane would stick to his board and add the talent if he say couldn't trade back. But based on your mock, Kincaid is not the BPA and nor would I expect Kincaid to be the pick if the board fell this way.