Mark80

Yeah, because giving a first round draft pick some time to develop is the same thing as "every college football grad." My lord, the number of ornery and over-exaggerating posters around here is increasing by the day.

14 starts under horrendous coaching and an injury filled rookie season. Way to give him a fair shot.

If the Bills traded into the first round to draft Bryce Petty they would be the laughing stock of the league and this site would absolutely implode. He's not going to be taken in the first, no way, no how. In fact, I would highly doubt he even goes in the second round and he will almost certainly be available for our second round pick. As noted earlier, next year's QB crop looks pretty darn good in my eyes. Cook, Kessler, Prescott, Boykin, Hogan all have nice potential and I look at Cook and Kessler as top level prospects (not quite luck level, but just below that) even though Kessler has yet to really receive a ton of acclaim. I think when all is said and done after next season he will. He's just like Brees in my mind, great decision maker, extremely accurate, some say lacking size and arm strength though but very successful in USC's pro-style offense. 69.7% completion, 3826 yards, 39 TDs, 5 INTs in one of the better conferences in the country. Sign me up.

Neither Revis nor Cromartie's play of late is giving a whiff of aging at this point. Sure they are getting older, but they are still playing at an extremely high level and are worth worrying about. Especially when they have Richardson and Wilkerson wrecking havoc on the DLine.

Man, I wish we could have new threads when news breaks. 56 pages is way too daunting of a task to try and tackle and I have no idea what the status is on Clay.

Actually, I am perfectly qualified to make an observation and generate an opinion on it. I'd say watching every single down every single season gives you that qualification. But thanks for your concern.

Agree 100% Why are you exaggerating people's points? No one said that he should never get blown up, we are saying that he gets blown up way more often than he should. There is a huge difference in those two statements.

Just because he's better than those clowns doesn't mean that he is one of the better centers in the league which a lot of posters here profess. At best he's average as far as skill level goes but above average as far as leadership qualities.

I'm more referring to running plays actually and there is no way it is by design on those. We have been dominated up the middle for the past 2 to 3 years. Just look at our short yardage success or lack there of. He, along with the guards, have been manhandled. People who do not see that just have their homer goggles on IMO. If he wasn't a vocal leader on the team I think a lot of his supporters would be singing a much different tune.

He's the most overrated Bills player we've had in a while. The people next to him have nothing to do with defenders driving him 1 or 2 yards into the backfield off the snap in one-on-one situations which I've been noticing on him for years. Last year, there were times were he was flat out knocked on his butt by guys one on one.

Tim Hasselbeck never did anything in the league. Matt is a good call though.

You shouldn't be allowed to start a thread again, ever.

Don't you have some false inside info to post somewhere?

Coaches, perhaps, but we've been in the game for big name players ever since I can remember. Paup, Speilman, Lofton, Spikes, Mario, Owens, Fletcher, to name a few big name guys off the top of my head quick.

Touche

Jim Kelly is the Derek Jeter of the Bills if there ever was one.

My god, don't you guys get sick of doing this stupid "in" thing. It's not clever, it's not funny, it offers exactly zero to the board, and it is the most annoying thing going around here. Please, for the love of god, just stop this crap already. The same few users doing it over and over and over. It was funny for a week or two, but now it's just stupid and unoriginal. Let the mods do their jobs and lock threads they deem repetitive.

You seem to be acting as if this is something new. The way of the world since the dawn of humanity.

http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/176079-greg-hardy/?hl=hardy

Probably my least favorite Bill over the past few years. He was terrible.

Exaggerate much?

Maybe all guys who are so broken hearted over FJ should watch this little snip regarding loyalty and the NFL. As the caption says, sentimentality can kill a franchise. Get over it. FJ was so good and so instrumental to our success that he has led our team to exactly 0 playoff appearances. Sure, I like FJ, but sometimes you have to move on. http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=12443627&ex_cid=espnapi_public

So, considering Shady's and Jerry's new deals does anyone know how much space we actually have left entering tomorrow with and without FJ on the roster? Thanks if you do.

TE's have a relatively long shelf life in the NFL.

It means that while the Rolling Stones have a some great songs, the Beatles have collection of great albums all plastered with great songs on them which makes them significantly better in my mind. Nah, the majority of us just read the title and answered the poll. It doesn't say which band rocks harder or is more rock and roll, it just says "Beatles vs Stones" and "Which is the better band?"