WhitewalkerInPhilly

I would be, for reasons already mentioned: we still have a second and third this year to fill in gaps (O-line, WR and LB) And Rosen. Definitely Rosen.

Definitely more than a lot of people in PPP

I'm not sure who you are talking about when you say 99% of viewers. Just one Patriot ball washing announcer.

I hope you got your money back.

It's a pity, but I think you can get a solid MLB in the second. We certainly needed an upgrade.

"There was a rumor, that there was a rumor, but that was just Bull****-"-The It Crowd

And that's fine...when you working salaried. Not when you are hourly and don't get those extra benefits.

I am seeing some crazy logic that they would not draft Barkley because they drafted Hyde. Hyde, at this point, is a change of pace back.

Really? Because most millennials I was in classes with went into STEM fields, and they can't get anything other than an entry level job with 5-10 years practical experience. I lot I know work a side gig, or have two jobs. When I hear "entitled" it's usually part of a story like, "and so I asked him to come in on his day off, with no notice, and then he had the gall to ask that we pay him overtime because he was pushing past 40 hours. I told him we would roll those hours to next week so we don't have to report overtime. (I personally had this happen to me multiple times before I graduated). Can you believe the entitlement?"

I AM a millennial (an older one), and so is every player in the draft this year. Pointing out Rosen in particular is stupid, because you can make that argument for each and every player out there. "Millenial" has become Boomer code for "I don't understand it, and I don't like it, and it's someone younger, so let's call it a Millenial problem"

I think all of the first round projections have some warts, but that is what was said about Goff and Wentz. The ones for Rosen are injury history and "he's a millennial", the latter of which is so stupid and lazy I can't believe it.

F5 F5 F5 F5 (For the record, he is who I currently want us to take.)

WGR has said that he is a journeyman

Just heard something about Julian Stanford at LB?

Nor should it have been. Cousins was the only UFA worth getting, and we have seen the contract he is getting. It has always made much more sense to prioritize drafting a guy, or trying to swing a trade.

I have come around on Foles. If we are offering the Cleveland 3rd, we are effectively getting a player at Tyrod level at a lower price. He would be an ok bridge while we look for a rookie.

I could believe it. Philly has to be realizing that their suitor pool is drying up, and I think Beane plays hardball and doesn't move down.

I have a sneaking feeling that we are waiting for the Glenn trade to be official.

I'm curious about the money, especially with him coming off an injury. Supposing that it's reasonable, I think it bolsters a weaker position. I'd prefer that we will in the positions you mentioned as well. Assuming we use both of our 1sts to get our QB., at least one of each in the 2nd and 3rd rounds, that doesn't leave a lot of gaping holes. I would use the 4th and 5th rounders to go DT and RB.

So far, no details are in

Our suspicion has been that it is less than his agent wanted. Agents like to advertise their successes. If Star took less money to go to a coach who got the most out of him in the past (a bridge contract) it might not be something that his agent wants to brag about.

I would absolutely take him for a 4th. Maybe even our later 3rd round pick.

Luck and it's not even close. To me, the injury risk is still worth taking a look for, even if he's at 80% for the rest of his career.

I'm happy for depth. Can he play linebacker?

He and Kelvin Benjamin would make for an excellent one-two punch. I just the fact that his Market is more than we may be willing to pay.