WhitewalkerInPhilly

Thhaaaaaaaat she had Top Secret clearance, and using personal email has all the security flaws inherent in personal email as opposed to a secure government account, and there was a risk of a data breach. . I will give her credit that she stopped and reported it when she realized she had screwed up, but let's not forget: Clinton got raked over the coals, and rightfully so, and it turned out nothing happened. And you RebTards still keep harping on "Crooked Hillary" So when the shoe in on the other foot, you trip over yourselves to explain it away? Do you realize how stupid you look?

I wanted to make sure the information was accurate...which I don't notice you denying or disputing. ? I answered your question, didn't I? One, really, that's the best derogatory nickname you could come up with? Jeez, put in some effort you phonetically challenged hillbilly. Two, like I previously wrote (and you ignored):

"Advisor" to the president. She had fullTop Secret clearance: https://www.axios.com/ivanka-trump-security-clearance-status-jared-kushner-f0ff4333-3665-4778-9c35-ba10bae55d94.html This means she has access to foreign intelligence and the president's daily intelligence briefing Oh come on, I know that it's not going to lead to anything. I personally doubt anything of significance happened, and I would be shocked if there are any actually repercussions. I just like to mention it because of the raging shitstorm that people on this board rained on Hillary Clinton for doing pretty much the exact same thing. I thought it was a nothing issue then, and I think it's a nothing issue now, but the hypocrisy is shocking. Everyone knows that rich people don't clean their own things.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/19/us/politics/ivanka-trump-emails.html Something something, "But her emails!" something something "Lock her up!!!"

I find it hilarious that these knuckleheads decide to keeping posting the NPC meme and calling people they don't like "NPC's". And yet, they are copying and pasting from 4chan, keep to simple (incorrect) answers, and have the same talking points. Irony is lost upon them. They think it's the next country ISIS takes (after I-raq, I-ran, those secret muslims must be coming from I-rony) ?

Wow...none of you have ever taken a job before you had new housing lined up? Some people must have never moved for work.

I like the idea that we spent more than a passing moment to determine whether or not we were going to promote a sexual assaulter to the higher court of the land in a rushed effort to make sure a Republican led Senate was kept. That she was questioned for four hours to relieve the worst day of her life, to have them question its validity, to try to smear her as being a pawn in a conspiracy, to have them try to question a psychology professor on how traumatic memories are remembered, to have them grill her over a fear of flying. I then watched when it was Kavanaugh's turn, the prosecutor brought on to keep questioning impartial was sent away, and Senators spent their time talking about how terrible it was that they had to be here. And even then, Kavanaugh couldn't hold off being a petulant man baby. And this made you...support them more? It's funny, you calling me an npc, because clearly it's you who are glitching, getting in people's way and not having a single original thought. It turns out, the majority of people in this country believe me. You're losing. The country is getting younger, and your lunacy has ended apathy to record turnouts.

It's funny, I had the same reaction, but for a completely different party

Look, if it wasn't clear to you that this year would be a step back, I don't know what to tell you. I didn't think it would be this bad, but this year was always about getting rid of dead cap and seeing what we had for 2019. I was actually impressed with some of Daboll's playcalling, but he's handcuffed by some truly awful QB play in Peterson and Anderson.

You know, I seem to notice that...no one who seems offended is disputing that Bolosaro has a record of anti-Democratic principles, advocated that the military murder people, or that he has publically stated that he wants the police killing more people. No, instead it's just insulting me, and making up some random personal anecdote about how "the left doesn't think democracy works" and "he says something I don't like, let's compare him to a journalist I don't like and therefore he's just a drone" You can't actually refute me, so you like to stroke yourselves to not feel quite so small.

It kind of is! "Today I learned that the reason why DR, 3rdnlong and Koko seem to say deranged things is because they like fascist dictatorships. That's why democracy, representation of the people and not brutally killing people who disagree with you seems like such a crazy idea to them!"

I think I finally figured it out. You get rock hard over a guy who says this: And then you move over to snark at the appearance of two other heads of state. This is what you like. You a-holes are happy about a guy who has explicitly said that Pinochet should have murdered more people, that democracy is weak and should be replaced. It is enlightening.

Again...if you want to hammer her, go ahead. But come on, how many times do you have to be cheated and pull out every bit of mental gymnastics to justify why you're not. It's honestly sad. It's like watching a senile retiree being conned by a psychic while his children desperately try to save him from losing the house.

Actually, that's a fair point. If you want to poke her for still getting all the advantages of being white and then also for claiming that he's Indian, that's fine by me. Whether Warren is deserving of scorn is not mutually inclusive to Trump being a lying sack of **** who couldn't be trusted to keep a promise to not light himself on fire.

You mean, the professor whose specialty is "tracking population migration via DNA analysis". Literally, someone whose job it is to see how populations move. https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2018/10/15/warren-addresses-native-american-issue/YEUaGzsefB0gPBe2AbmSVO/story.html So, when I respond to your question of "are you really this stupid?" I should really be asking you that. A big loudmouthed bully made a bet. Someone did what he asked. He responded like a mewling coward and reneged on a promise...again. Like when he repeatedly stiffed his contractors. He denied what he said on camera, despite the fact that there is literally a recording of it, like when he mocked a disabled person and then denied it. So it tells me a great deal when your response is "Well, she isn't AS Native as I think should count, so anything Trump says doesn't count"

I'm sorry, I'm sure that was funny, but I couldn't understand you over the incredible mental gymnastics people here are doing trying to work out how 45 isn't a lying POS, and that he totally didn't promise to make a donation, and how it's all really Warren's fault for complying his challenge. ? Or hell, maybe he's just senile.

Hey, she took the test! That means Trump will live up to his deal and donate a million dollars to charity, right? I mean, here is Fox News video of him saying it. Not some "liberal cabal", Fox News: Annnnnnd he won't. Here's him denying what he said on video. Again https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/411414-trump-denies-offering-1-million-for-warren-dna-test-even-though-he It is hilarious that people here believe this putz.

I'll be honest, that would be big

I heard someone on Philly radio say they would give a 5th. To that, I say "get the hell out" Shady is on the down side but he's easily the most explosive player we have on offense. You don't get better by trading star players for peanuts. We should know by now

I love Shady. He has been a delight to watch these past 3+ years. When my wife (the Eagles fan) called me to tell me Shady had been traded to the Bills she prefaced it by saying "Something terrible has happened" But if we can snag a 2nd and 3rd for him, and considering the money we save, I am for it. We are wasting him this year, and we can pick up someone serviceable in the 1st or 2nd next year.

I know it does. So I was a bit hesitant when I first heard. I mean, I disliked the choice because I find his ruling on contraceptives to be laughably stupid, but there was a grain of salt. And then two more, independent claims cane in. And then the FBI has not allowed to corroborate or disprove them. Then I saw this rambling incoherent mess of explanations. I'm sorry for you man, but at this point the way Kavanaugh handled it is indefensible. And yet....so many nutbags are intent on doing so.

You clearly sliding down Trumps. How is that working out for you? Source please

So...what *is* happening, since you claim to know? And if I am accused, I would want to clear my name. And I don't think I could look guiltier testifying if I had a death wish to be strapped to Ole Sparky So...you are saying that she wasn't grilled over her fear of flying? https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/donald-trump-jr-mocks-christine-blasey-ford-twitter-selective-fear-of-flying-kavanaugh-hearing-today/ So, what you are saying is that you better trust the exploding, rambling, conspiracy spewing person who broke down crying over his accuser, who sat and took stupid questions because people were desperate to prove her wrong.

Did you actually check in? She was raked over the coals so hard she got grilled about her fear of flying. That's how far the Republican appointed lawyer had to scrape the bottom of the barrel to find anything. In contrast, Kavanaugh looked like he had the fortitude of Nick the Squealer from the Simpson's. But somehow, he is the victim of a conspiracy so vast that we can't bother to investigate. ?

Jesus. I listened a bit to Kavanaugh. Between his pouting, the petulance, his random asides about spaghetti on ketchup and how he made varsity, refusing to answer questions and a desire to see his name cleared....but not actually let people investigate I don't think I could imagine a guiltier looking perp. How people here can defend him makes me fear for the future of the species.