Jump to content

Punch

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,214
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Punch

  1. My wife and I visited Iceland 7 years ago. One day we took a tour on a glacier, which was overwhelming and surreal--- I was wearing a Sabres hat (the 2008 Winter Classic toque) and we were hailed by a couple from Buffalo on their honeymoon.
  2. How would you separate "best record" from "winning percentage"? The team with the best record also has the highest winning percentage.
  3. He didn’t have clear possession before his right foot grazed the field.
  4. It’s funny how much I despise Bengals fans now. Great job guys! There’s nothing more endearing than uninvited guests coming over and telling us their dad can beat up our dad.
  5. My understanding is he’s been with the team but not on the sidelines yet during games (for the reason you cite).
  6. As you well know, if the Bills beat the Bengals in Week 17, the Ravens would have an opportunity to win the North outright this week.
  7. The Bengals were “handed” the North Division and higher seeding just like the Chiefs were “handed” the 1 seed with this proposal. If you’re so certain the Bengals won’t lose to Baltimore then why does it matter where the theoretical Wild Card game would be held?
  8. The Ravens are clearly disadvantaged in this proposal as are the Bengals, albeit in different ways. It stinks.
  9. This proposal is full of holes (it remains to be seen whether knowingly or not).
  10. The Bengals cannot be seeded low enough to miss Buffalo in the Divisional Round. Edit: Honestly, I’m not sure I can work out all the permutations after a few beers.
  11. Cincinnati and Baltimore is only a coin flip wrt the Wild Card Round. Baltimore was unfairly deprived at a shot for the AFC North with the Bills-Bengals cancellation.
  12. There is no scenario where the Bills and Bengals can meet in the AFCCG, they can only meet in the Divisional Round.
  13. The Bills would unfairly benefit if they host Cincy in the Divisional Round (assuming they both win Week 18). There are several inequitable scenarios that need to be factored into this proposal.
  14. Yeah that’s right, I had to play out the scenarios on paper.
  15. I think we can only play Cincy in the Divisional Round.
  16. You’re correct, I misread Scenario 3. Apparently Buffalo and Cincinnati cannot meet in the AFCCG?
  17. If the Bills beat the Bengals in Week 17 and the Ravens likewise beat Cincy in Week 18, both the Bengals and Ravens would finish 11-6 but Baltimore would be 2-0 head to head. Strange that isn’t taken into consideration or did I get something wrong?
  18. If Cincinnati and Buffalo both win in Week 18, a theoretical AFCCG between them would be at a neutral site, per the proposal. Cincy lost the opportunity to beat Buffalo in Week 17 with the cancelled game.
  19. The Raiders have often played the Chiefs tough in recent years—- remember their matchup earlier this season on MNF?
  20. The proposal will likely pass but it isn’t “official” yet until the owners meet tomorrow.
×
×
  • Create New...