Cookiemonster

Ditto from me on that, and fair points on your rebuttal.

I wouldn't mind doing some negotiating with lady Ga Ga, she is smokin hot, like to get under her zipper.

Hey push, are you a drinker? If so, why can't you just get over the Beer/Liquor buzz, fall down, puke, and wake up with a headache attraction, man I graduated from that a long time ago.

No, I don't think he is making theses statements to get a reaction, I belive that these are his sincere stone age beliefs. He is a knuckledragger.

Man crayonz you gotta lighten up a bit with this crusade you are on, you are defintley in the minority, you gotta be over 60, besides, if you would just sit back and toke a little, you wouldn't have to eat crayons to get your kicks.

On this board, that is as good as hearing it from good sources "deep within".

Classic

I was there, cleaned yours too!

Man I gotta agree with you here, maybe consistent and serviceable would be a better way to describe him, but scary....never!

Man, I love when you post, not only are your posts credible and enjoyable, but seeing that ass over and over again, is just plain nice.

Now there's a sensible man.

The rest of the Country can't, you have to remember, no pun intendended, that it is looked at currently, from a punishment standpoint, the same as heroin. The stigma is wearing some, but we just aren't there yet. People are still being prosecuted and harrassed, the Obama Admin seems to be lightining up a bit, I didn't say lighting up a bit. As far as I know, they still routinely test you for it at most companies as part of a pre-employment condition, and they still look at you as if you are a criminal, if you are caught using. For christ's sake, they almost prosecuted Phelps from just a picture of him smoking a bong.WTF BTW, we need a bong smoking icon added to TBD, I mean geez, we have a beer swilling icon, what gives?

Thats just Bullsh%t, come on, thats way overblown, I mean look at me, I remebered how to get to this site, how to access a topic that I liked, I remebered how to log in, my password, etc...now if you can just give me a few more minutes here, I am sure I will remeber exactly what I was thinking about posting.

I see, so Michael Phelps is a loser huh?Get freakin real, so drinking alchol must make you a winner. Or is that just for losers too! Just curious, I would bet that you are a drinker, see that proves my point, because you are a loser. Once his state passes the Medical MJ law, he can get a prescription for the little aches and pains that are sure to follow, what are you going to say then sunshine? Class of '78,just plain high.

Well now, that explains it, very plausible to me, come on people give Skoobs a break here, he just might be telling the truth....this time.

Now there's some sound wisdom, he is correct, I mean we really have no clue at this point about Edwards, although, I believe that he has tremendous long term potential, and really like what I have seen from him so far. If we target a 4th or 5th round insurance policy, I am ok with that, but we really need to give Trent this year to prove himself, I don't think that it is much of a risk, and then we will have enough of a book on him to decide what we do next year, if he doesn't meet or exceed expectations, then we will probably be in a pretty good position to get somebody good then anyway.

Hey Clem, looky here, we got our selves a genuine road scholar, english teacher type, that probably can't come up with an original thought of their own, but can sure tell you where the period and commas should be. Nice work, hows that for your friggin paragraph.

Yeah, no biggee, I thought that you were taking exception to something that I had posted, which BTW, is okay too. Just because they charged him, doesn't mean that they are going to have an easy time making it stick. No doubt that he will do some time, but I do not belive anywhere near 15 years, if any. Think about it a minute, a guy gets hit on a 6 lane highway in friggin Miami no less, is rushing to catch a bus, and isn't in the assigned crossing area, sure sounds like contributory negligence to me, and in no way am I justifying Dante being lit, but did it contribute to the accident? The question is, would anybody have had time to avoid this, drunk or not. Thats the thing that they will be debating ad nauseam over the next several months. It was good on his part that he stopped, but bad to try and lie your way out of it, he might as well have kept going, so he isn't totally manning up here either. He said that the guy was lying in the middle of the road when he hit him, and that he had stopped drinking at midnight, both lies IMO. I do, however have a problem with charging people with a crime that is going to radically alter their future and career, for something that may not have been avoidable, a very slippery slope, and I know that I will probably get lambasted for saying this, but it does seem unfair some, I could see involuntary manslaughter, or some other lesser charge, unless they can come up with some facts that alter my thoughts. I know that if I were stupid enough to run out on a 6 lane highway and take a chance like that, and got hit, I sure as hell wouldn't want somebody going to jail for that, drunk or not. Now if I am in the crosswalk, or the guy is speeding like a bat out of hell, and he is impaired, than by all means, I want him prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Friggin classic!

Your Point?

Slow down will you, we need to Pace ouselves some!

All good points, but you didn't address the issue of the Bills not really being able to target someone at 11, that is a real need, and worhy of the 11th overall selction that otherwise would not be there at 21.

Exactly, there is a big differnce between being enamored by someone, and actually pulling the trigger on a trade, the need has to be there.

If this is the case, then we shouldn't have any problem moving him, and getting pretty decent value in return, but I highly doubt that this is the case, why are they not beating down our door then? I think that you would agree, that since we really do not feel that there will be anybody of signficant need for us at 11, that would otherwise not be available at 21, or at least somebody equal to the person who represents a significant need, then why not move to 21, and move up 15 spots for the sceond pick. That would assure us that the guy (Mack or maybe Pettigrew) will be there AT 28, when they would otherwise not likely be their at 43. I really don't thinks that this scenario is as bad as everyone is making it out to be, of course that all depends on everybody's individual interpretation of Peters and his value. I do not think that he has a much value as a lot of people on this board do, and then throw in the attitude part, and it's a no-brainer for me.

H2o, you are "The Man"