It doesn't mean they necessarily believe in it, it's a data source they have access to. PFF like any other source that provides data for any industry isn't perfect and will produce information that doesn't pass the eyeball test. Is Kincaid an example of that? Idk that's why we are having this discussion.
Which half are you referring to? Was Kincaid that dynamic, or was he simply our de facto #2 receiving option because the rest of the wide receivers were ineffective in 2023
Andrews
Bowers
Engram
Ferguson
Friermuth
Goedert
Henry
Hockenson
Kelce
Kittle
Kraft
LaPorta
Likely
McBride
Njoku
I just started naming tight ends and putting them in alphabetical order. Who would you start Kincaid over in week 1 from that list?
I thought it was common for NFL players to go out to sea, indulge in drugs on the first night, and then spend the week relaxing before returning when they can pass a drug test. Shame on the girl with the camera.
At this point, yes, he’s not a top 50 player, which is why the Warriors weren’t a real championship contender. However, when he was a top 50 player, they were a championship contender.
He’s also considering Draymond Green, a defensive player of the year, a role player and admits the Warriors would never have been great without a coaching change.
And Denver won a championship a few years ago and still fired their coach before playoffs. The more this is discussed the more you see the need for changes when it comes to coaching and roster building.
The difference between Jokic & Allen is that Allen isn’t on the field or court on defense.
Green might be one the best NBA players Izzo has produced. Would his career look much differently had he been drafted by another team? Absolutely, but now he's considered one of the best defensive players in the last decade. “Team concept” works better when everyone is in the Hall of Fame discussion.
So sometimes you need a coaching change to get over the hump?