murra

They got you to talk about their articles, so IMO they're doing their job.

Call me crazy, but I think he is better.

Wait, so he planned to start weeks 2, 3, and 4 losing?

No, but I think the only reason that Polian was interested at all in McCargo was the fact that Marv drafted him. Marv may have told Polian about McCargo and how he thought highly of him, and Polian decided to give it a go because he respects Marv's thoughts.

Clearly our current FO believes strongly that you can acquire OL in FA. That's why it hasn't been a major perogative for them. They went with Walker and Dockery, and they knew that was their plan, to pay big bucks and bring someone in, so it only makes sense that they haven't invested as much into the O-Line in the draft (however as you pointed out since '06 they've approached the position 6 times which isn't a low number-- they're trying). I think that the major need of the team is Center, and we'll see if they approach it similarly and look to pick one up in the off-season. Personally, after the Mike Williams tragedy, I'm all for only picking up proven linemen.

Yeah, and maybe your avatar is not much better. The Sabres franchised is jinxed as it is. Don't be a reason for not winning the cup. Passion does not mean avoiding all obvious and blatant rules of superstition.

So ignorant. It wasn't a 4th for a 1st. It was a 4th for NOTHING!

I guess I was right... LINK

I like Edwards more than I like Cutler. But Cutler is better than Edwards until Edwards proves otherwise.

Haha.

Cutler, Rivers? Manning?

Really, you were upset when you read that? His final argument to cap off the entire thing was: "25) Finally, we have the International Mask & Puppet Museum, and they don't" Really? Really? I can't believe you let that get to you. That was probably the funniest article I've read in a long time. Oh Syracuse and their puppets...

You do realize we didn't use McGargo, right?

Really? Who would trade a third-round pick for someone who hasn't seen the field? McCargo is a bust, I'm suprised we got something for him. Maybe we should have thrown this 4th and a 3rd at KC...of course that would mean making an effort to improve.

What are you saying?

If you're being serious...you realize that you're saying to me that there is a law which abides to one conference in the NFL and not the other. Re-read that, realize how foolish it sounds, and get back to me.

This is a stupid argument really...What does it matter, the Bills did not get TG like I said.

No. I read that. Did you? It isn't true.

dying

No. I don't think you know what you're talking about. "The legislation establishes new or enhanced standards for all U.S. public company boards, management, and public accounting firms. It does not apply to privately held companies."

No. It doesn't. The NFL reported it on time because the NFL maintains its status as a reputable public enterprise, however if they chose to report such information in three days, they have the right to because no one's income or well-being would be compromised otherwise. There is no stock in the Kansas City Chiefs.

No, but I'm trying to bring you to reality. It's not happening. I want TG as much as the next guy, but I'm not falling into to insanity to keep believing...

He didn't get quoted as saying "no comment". He said there is absolutely no deal. Thats not tipping his hand...that's definitive..

They quoted their GM.