murra

Technically Trent Edwards HAS lost a game. Figuratively, however, he has not.

IMO they should take all those down.

He's technically the starting running back for the Patriots. I remember he ran for like 5 or 6 TDs as a rookie, which I thought was not bad for a back up. I also think his career was forever side-lined with a knee injury. Though that might have been Bryson. Or maybe they both did, I can't really remember.

I didn't notice Morris, I'll take that back then because he's actually good.

I think that the Buffalo Bills 2000 Draft ranks up there as one of the worst drafts in the history of the franchise. Others have busts, sure, but most also have key players picked up in later rounds. The 2000 draft is led by one of our bigger bust, Flowers, followed by absolutely no one recognizable.

That's a good one. Especially because he's a tight end. I'm more partial to the trivia question: The Bills selected Thurman Thomas in the second round in the 1988 Draft. Who did they select in the First?

Everyone falls for a troll. It's one of the few internet certainties.

Sounds like a losman hating troll. Your metaphor wasn't that creative. Either you're smarter than I've given you, and you're purposefully using Rodgers as a metaphor for Losman, or you're crazy.

He has to be joking. None of his arguments made any sense. Being bigger doesn't mean you can throw farther, and Aaron hasn't proven that he can play in cold weather games. Even if he does, you've failed severely at proving to me a valid reason for why you'd rather have him than Edwards.

Why?

http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showtopic=74568

Surely you can not honestly think Aaron Rodgers is more of an MVP candidate than Trent Edwards.

He wasn't talking about League MVP. He was talking about who is the best quarterback.

I agree entirely. But that does not mean Trent Edwards is the best quarterback. Drew Brees is not exactly sabotaging his team and losing games single-handedly either. I think his losses are a product of his team's ability being less than ours. That being said, according to your theory shouldn't Kerry Collins be the best QB?

I don't know, Drew Brees is pretty good. Let's separate our facts from opinions though.

To partially answer my own question, I think tomorrow they'll have it on the ESPN PTI Archive section.

Crap, I missed that. Do they re-air PTI in its entirety?

You realize this is the NFL and not the NHL, right? You keep your franchise Quarterback until he's too old and becomes unproductive. That's how it works. IMO this thread should become closed if for no reason other than because it is a non-debatable issue as to whether or not he will be signed, and the debate over when he will be signed is as meaningless as the yards Edwards throws in each of the five games he's won.

It seems these arguments are the necessary redundancies that help us get through the week. No?

Analogy of the year award winner?

How doth one run for 167 years?

You can only be bad for so long... ...unless you're the Lions.

I hope you're right. It looks right now like we just have to win 2 of the 3 division games coming up, and keep an eye on Pittsburgh, and maybe, just maybe, we get that beloved bye.

Sorry, I didn't see your post, and basically said the same thing, I was just responding to the general tone of the first few posts.

To be honest, we placed Whitner in that Nickel Corner position (even though we played mostly zone), and had Wilson at FS, and Scott at SS in most all passing situations. It wasn't that they favored Scott over Simpson, it was they played Wilson over Simpson.