Jump to content

murra

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,677
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by murra

  1. We don't need a new stadium.
  2. What's wrong with you? Why do you have to post that same nonsense a million times over. I can't believe it but I might actually use the ignore button. At least with SKOOBY I would be entertained by his drivel. You're not even trying to hide that you're a troll.
  3. I think it's the whole "absolutely no coaching experience" thing...
  4. That sounds like a dozen or so of my posts. Way to admit that you're skooby. Hopefully someone has the ability to IP check that so we can send you back to BB.com where you belong.
  5. Very few people are going to read past that first line.
  6. If Mike Tice is an assistant HC can we make him an OC? Is that a lateral move?
  7. Do we play the Redskins next season?
  8. Wow. I know Cutler played bad, but would you really not want the Bills losses to at least be entertaining? T.O. would've had 10+ catches a game.
  9. Wait a minute...some people in this thread are acting like he's going to be drafted in the first round? Come on folks.
  10. But not two years of seasoning.
  11. What point of view? I'm pretty sure Cincy is playing for home field advantage. This story that they're not is ridiculous.
  12. If everything plays out like the article says, and Kubiak's fired, I would be shocked and upset with the league if Cowher chose the Texans over the Bills. Assuming we put the same offer on the table, and all contractual/power differences were circumstantial, that would be a big blow to Buffalo. We're a storied franchise. Cowher knows that, he tried to beat our superbowl teams plenty of times. I have to imagine that first impressions go along way and Buffalo's success is at least marginally ingrained in the back of Bill's head. I don't think we'll get Cowher, but for other reasons. I think Bills fans have been so neglected, that it's sad that we're worrying about the Texans being a possible player. Really. They've never been to the playoffs. I know we've got a loooong drought, but come on.
  13. I'm not a big fan of their show, but... I'm pretty sure even they predicted Jauron would fail. hard.
  14. Of course, we need him.
  15. Well put. He fits nicely in discussion next to Moulds. Like I said, Schobel is good, it's just silly to pretend like he's anything special. Good players are essential, and make up most the roster on good teams. Because we're so bad, and have been lately, we have no difference maker, and only one or two good players. That makes you guys inflate his value. A 3 sack performance is just a meaningless number in a big loss, sorry.
  16. No. It's just Polian's philosophy. No more, no less.
  17. Good for him. Did he make any difference? No. He's not a difference maker. He's a decent/above average player. Did it occur to you that those three sacks did nothing to rattle their offense?
  18. I'm not really bashing Schobel. He's obviously a good player. It's just please, take him off this pedestal. He's never taken over a game to the tune of affecting the QB. Sure he has had a good solid career, but stop making him out to be an actual threatening DE. Numbers at the end of season don't dictate the wealth of talent of a DE. It's how they can effect a game. Schobel, rarely, if ever, actually was a force.
  19. Yeah, monster games in blow out losses are really impressive. Too bad he never shows up when it counts.
  20. how?
  21. This needs to be said: Those claiming that strength and condition is directly related to number of injuries as a fact aren't realizing that they're the conspiracy theorists. Can all of that group of people please stop continually pretending like there is any evidence to your claim. It is completely hypothetical. Sure, it could be true. But right now it's a myth. That's alright, though. You can continue to support your theory, just remember to refer to it as one. It gets annoying reading people who pretend like there is definitely a direct relation.
  22. I'm not going to flame away...but you do realize that when the rebuilding occurs, people will look at these recievers with (I think deserving) sympathy. I mean, Lee Evans clearly isn't why he only has 3 catches/gm. End of story. It's been like that his entire career. If you get thrown to 4 times, how are you going to get 8 catches? Does he not seem to always come up with the toss up in the endzone? Yeah T.O., Reed, Parrish are probably gone. It doesn't matter. They might suck, but pointing fingers at the WR corp is laughable.
×
×
  • Create New...