spartacus

"grade: DL - C+ (DE's played well. DT's not so much)" Bell and Gore really gouged the Bills on the ground those DTs stunk bring back Dareus - I hear he is available

As you note, 30 cycles should be the standard for PCR testing you may ask what the CDC, per their PCR instructions), is trying to accomplish by mandating that PCR test be run at 45 cycles this would result ins 35 TRILLION copies of genetic material to test, instead of 5 BILLION at 30 cycles

statin drug annuity program soon to be outdone by the Covid monthly vaccination program for the common cold

The model is only wrong if you are measuring it against accuracy If the intent of the of the model was to drive the fear porn and shutdown non-sense- then the model was a roaring success

in season firings will be down dramatically, due to cover from Covid complications with no fans, revenue and cash will be down substantially without fans, the negative reaction to bad coaching will be muted as well this will suppress the urge to pay multiple coaches to not work

so the FDA will look the other way when this UK vaccine is unleashed in America? I'm sure the comparable UK agency has reduced their quality standards, just the same

if they don't fix the problem, they will likely just doctor the results- so they can proceed to production. Congress exempted big pharma from all liability for anything that may go wrong, so no worries there. problems must be huge , though, to have been caught by the super-relaxed, non-existent FDA quality procedures

speaking of sources see if you can share the links to the conclusive research isolating the COVID virus - so any test run is actually legitimate The only support I've seen justifies the wonders of the OCR testing mechanism Nothing isolating the virus with the use of electron micrographs showing the purified virus

the plays that started outside the red zone

for fantasy, moss may be better due to likelihood of short yardage TDs on the other hand, Singletary may not get dragged down on the two so many times

More fun with testing The Coronabros will swear up and down that the PCR test is highly sensitive and accurate. The process may be foolproof- but GIGO still applies "garbage in garbage out" https://vaccineimpact.com/2020/censored-covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless-everything-weve-been-told-about-covid-is-a-hoax/ summary from the article We need to know where the RNA for which the PCR tests are calibrated comes from. Particle purification — i.e. the separation of an object from everything else that is not that object, is an essential pre-requisite for proving the existence of a virus, and thus to prove that the RNA from the particle in question comes from a new virus. (and not from existing common cold coronavirus already in the body) The reason for this is that PCR is extremely sensitive, which means it can detect even the smallest pieces of DNA or RNA — but it cannot determine where these particles came from. (like from common cold generic material) That has to be determined beforehand. Because the PCR tests are calibrated for gene sequences (in this case RNA sequences because SARS-CoV-2 is believed to be a RNA virus), we have to know that these gene snippets are part of the looked-for virus. And to know that, correct isolation and purification of the presumed virus has to be executed. The article interviewed several science teams that conducted studies supporting the PCR tests for Covid. The science teams admitted that the electron-microscopic shots depicted in their in vitro experiments did NOT show purified viruses. In addition, nobody said purification was not a necessary step. Thus, the genetic material being searched for in the ultra-sensitive, super- accurate PCR test has NEVER BEEN ISOLATED TO BE FROM THE COVID VIRUS. Garbage in, garbage out. More likely, after multiplying the sample 35 TRILLION times, the test is picking up genetic material of the common cold in everyone’s body- which is why most testing positive are not sick.

too much money to worry about a bogus virus that does minimal harm to college kdis

if election results nation wide are being contested, how can Congress be seated by Jan 20 to elect Pelosi as Speaker. sounds more like Pompeo takes over as sitting Sec of State

https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/infectious-positive-pcr-test-result-covid-19/ The key take away is that the PCR test often does not detect infectious virus. This is especially true when having to multiply the genetic sample 45 times to create 35 TRILLION copies just to trigger a positive result

the fact that nobody is sick couldn't be because the 'tests" could just find common cold coronavirus after multiplying their genetic sample 35 TRILLION times

yes - much better to act like a politician to the people and pocket millions from China and Ukraine for selling out those same people

This supports the George Carlin observation regarding the stupidity of the average American. and further realization that 50% are dumber than the average

Florida just fired Qwest for failing to turn over 75k test results dating back to May who knows if they actually did the tests but Florida had huge spike to 8k cases on 8/31 which is probably the catch up from Qwest

The bigger point of the story is that the PCR test is not even searching for Covid virus cells in one's body It is searching for computer manipulated RNA particles created that may exist in all coronavirus particles in your body, not just the covid one. The coronavirus, including the common cold, is the most prevalent virus in the human body. Congratulations- you are positive for the common cold

good news found CDC lab instructions for PCR test dated 7/13 which replaced the 6/12 instructions I had seen earlier seems like it happened after all https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download note that on pg 26 (f), the CDC is instructing that the thermal cycles be run 45 times this doubles the sample 45 times, resulting in 35 TRILLION copies why mandate 45 cycles, if the intended threshold to determine a positive test is supposed to be 40 cycles (pg 35) ? An obvious rationale is that labs are to use the extra cycles generate positive test results where none should exist In either case, the doctor in the NY TImes article is adamant taht the threshold is too high "Tests with thresholds so high may detect not just live virus but also genetic fragments, leftovers from infection that pose no particular risk — akin to finding a hair in a room long after a person has left, Dr. Mina said. Any test with a cycle threshold above 35 is too sensitive, agreed Juliet Morrison, a virologist at the University of California, Riverside. “I’m shocked that people would think that 40 could represent a positive,” she said." Shutting down the economy based on a rigged test is criminal Read these source articles townhall.com/tipsheet/bronsonstocking/2020/08/29/it-looks-like-a-lot-of-those-positive-covid-tests-should-have-been-negative-n2575305 nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html

The following discusses the flaws in the PCR test As I noted, the PCR test range started from 35- 45 replication cycles. On June 12, the CDC PCR instructions raised the recommended cycle count to 45- which basically multiplies the genetic material 35 trillion times From the Times article: Tests with thresholds so high may detect not just live virus but also genetic fragments, leftovers from infection that pose no particular risk — akin to finding a hair in a room long after a person has left, Dr. Mina said. Any test with a cycle threshold above 35 is too sensitive, agreed Juliet Morrison, a virologist at the University of California, Riverside. “I’m shocked that people would think that 40 could represent a positive,” she said. “ https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html https://www.zerohedge.com/political/watch-live-trump-speaks-during-discussion-community-safety-kenosha by Jon Rappoport September 1, 2020 Townhall.com, August 29: “According to The New York Times, potentially 90 percent of those who have tested positive for COVID-19 have such insignificant amounts of the virus present in their bodies that such individuals do not need to isolate nor are they candidates for contact tracing. Leading public health experts are now concerned that overtesting is responsible for misdiagnosing a huge number of people with harmless amounts of the virus in their systems.” “’Most of these people are not likely to be contagious…’ warns The Times.” Yes, that’s what the NY Times is confessing (8/29): “Some of the nation’s leading public health experts are raising a new concern in the endless debate over coronavirus testing in the United States: The standard tests are diagnosing huge numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts of the virus. Most of these people are not likely to be contagious…” “In three sets of testing data…compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.” Let me break this down for you, because it’s a lot worse than the Times admits. The rabbit hole goes much deeper—and I’ve been reporting on the deeper facts for months. The issue appears to be the ballooning sensitivity of the PCR test. It’s so sensitive that it picks up inconsequential tiny, tiny amounts of virus that couldn’t harm a flea—and it calls these amounts “positive.” Therefore, millions of people are labeled “positive/infected” who carry so little virus that no harm would come to them or anyone they come in contact with. That would be bad enough. But the truth is, the PCR test is not able to produce ANY reliable number that reflects how much virus a person is carrying. A lot, a little, it doesn’t matter. The test has never been validated, in a large-scale study, for the ability to quantify the amount of virus a person is carrying. I’ve proposed how that study should be done IN THE REAL WORLD, NOT IN THE LAB. You take 1000 people and remove tissue samples from them. A lab puts these samples through its PCR and announces which virus it found in each case and how much virus it found in each case. It says: “All right, in patients 23, 46, 76, 89, 265 we found a high amount of virus.” That should mean these particular patients are visibly sick. They will have obvious clinical symptoms. Why? Because actual illness requires millions of millions of a virus replicating in the body. So now we unblind these particular patients with high amounts of virus, according to the PCR. Are they, in fact, sick? Or are they running marathons and swimming five miles a day? Let’s see. For real. THIS VALIDATION OF THE PCR HAS NEVER BEEN DONE. Therefore, the claim that the PCR can determine how much virus is in a human is completely and utterly unproven. Period. Therefore, ALL the PCR tests being done on people all over the world reflect NOTHING about illness, infection, contagion, or transmission. The scam is wall to wall. But there’s more. The PCR isn’t even testing for a particular virus in the first place. It’s using a piece of RNA assumed to be part of a virus. The assumption is unproven. And finally, as I’ve been writing and demonstrating for months, there is no evidence that researchers used proper procedure to discover “a new coronavirus that is causing a pandemic.” Therefore, the PCR test, as worthless as it already is, aims to show the presence of a germ that has never been shown to exist. But let’s lock down the planet, destroy economies and untold numbers of lives in the process. SOURCES: townhall.com/tipsheet/bronsonstocking/2020/08/29/it-looks-like-a-lot-of-those-positive-covid-tests-should-have-been-negative-n2575305 nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html

The PCR test is being replaced anyway 1. if not with with the all in one Flu/Covid test 2. trhe qucik at home test too hard to find covid only cases nobody knows what black box is being used to test you

I got the info from the CDC site back in June Could not find current instructions for use You may have better luck Now they have info on new test to search for covid and the flu in the same test Since they don't advertise what test is being used- be sure the media will have a field day with these new test results for the flu to be used to inflate the covid test #s CDC’s Diagnostic Multiplex Assay for Flu and COVID-19 https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/multiplex.html

none of these containment measures are based in science and none of them will stop the virus if sick people were not forced into nursing homes to kill thousands, this virus would be a non-event

what's astounding? the PCR testing is doing exactly what is was designed to do identify coronavirus genetic materrial in one's body - after multiplying that material 35 TRILLION times doesn't matter that COVID-19 has nothing to to do with the results it's not a coinicidence that the CDC changed the PCR specs in June from doubling of 35x to 45x this increased the times the genetic material was multiplied from 5 billion to 35 trillion right about the same time as the "2nd wave" hit with new cases everywhere yet still nobody sick