Jump to content

Turn Down For Watkins

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    588

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Turn Down For Watkins

  1. Turn Down For Watkins
    personally i'd take either.. but would still lean slighlty towards Luck for now
  2. Turn Down For Watkins
    Urbik is pretty bad..
  3. Turn Down For Watkins
    yes. (characters)
  4. Turn Down For Watkins
    he's gotta be. its the only logical explanation
  5. Turn Down For Watkins
    If they could upgrade the o-line the way they were able to upgrade the d-line this offseason than they would be such a better football team. we can only hope they're smart enough to do that
  6. Turn Down For Watkins
    well if they wanted to permanatley move Levitre to LT than Rhinehart and someone like Waters could be the starters with Urbik/Hangartner as a backup. Seems like a better line depth wise
  7. Turn Down For Watkins
    well if thats the case than theres also a former pro bowl guard out there in Brian Waters. Than you could continue to let Levitre battle it out for the LT position. Im not a big fan of relying on these street free agents that other teams have had weeks to pick up and havent done so.. but thats just how bad our o-line is right now. good job OBD
  8. Turn Down For Watkins
    i feel like if they finish with a worse record this yr than they did last yr they should be held accoutable. theres no excuse for that imo
  9. Turn Down For Watkins
    I dont see why they cant just bring in a LT (Mckinnie) and move Levitre back to guard. Mckinnie, Levitre, Wood, Rhinehart, Pears/ Bell. That actually has the looks of a decent o-line.. am i right?
  10. Turn Down For Watkins
    I know right? ESPN hates us..
  11. Turn Down For Watkins
    must say he would fit in amirably with our current o-line
  12. Turn Down For Watkins
    rewatching the game I thought Bell was the weakest link on the o-line.. every one else was atleast servicable. I was also somewhat impressed with how Pears was able to hold up
  13. Turn Down For Watkins
    im starting to think the same thing
  14. Turn Down For Watkins
    we already had a terrell pryor type qb on the roster.. his name is josh nesbitt..
  15. Turn Down For Watkins
    maybe they should start dipping into that 26+ mil of cap space they have available? just a thought though..
  16. Turn Down For Watkins
    still dont understand why they dont bring in Brian Waters. He'd be a huge upgrade at guard.
  17. Turn Down For Watkins
    i think he should watch out for kamar aiken taking his spot
  18. Turn Down For Watkins
    it amazes me how mediocre our corners are even when we addresss the positon too much
  19. Turn Down For Watkins
    dissapointed.. but clinging to the "its just preseason" hope..
  20. Turn Down For Watkins
    i'd much rather have him as a backup than thigpen. i say a 5th or later would be well worth it
  21. Turn Down For Watkins
    i went to camp today and he was one of the first d-lineman who really stuck out to me. he looked really good
  22. Turn Down For Watkins
    very nice breakdown. im curious to see if this forrest kid has a chance at overtaking moorman
  23. Turn Down For Watkins
    cant see them cutting kelsay.. put him in there for dotson and i think your close.
  24. Turn Down For Watkins
    best post i've seen around here in awhile
  25. Turn Down For Watkins
    thats what i was thinking. not sure if they would actually do it though
×
×
  • Create New...