Tarannau 29

I think theres 2 issues here that people are blurring - one is are any of our QB's good enough to start for another team in the league, the other one is whether or not, based on the numbers and reputations they have, they'd be given the chance to. I would say the answer to the first is yes, whilst the second probably not. Whilst I can't see at this stage any GM's wanting to put their faith in Edwards or Fitzpatrick, if circumstances had placed them in teams like Arizona, Jacksonville, I can't see them doing any worse than the starters there. Lets wait and see what Edwards can produce in an actual functioning offense this year, and then compare him to other QB's.

Forgive my ignorance, but is there a reason (e.g. in the tradition of the team) that the jerseys don't have a logo on?

Aren't those points all just stating the obvious?? 1) Of course there is more to football tactically than simply establishing a run game to open up the field, and teams that try to simply run might not be to too successful, but he uses examples of teams that establish the passing game in the 1st half, as opposed to teams that FAIL to esablish the run. 2) I thought everyone knew that secondary and pass-rush defense are intertwined? 3) OF COURSE the turnover ratio is only relevent dependent on what each team does with the possessions it gives you. So some teams can still be successful with a poor one, i.e. the Giants. But its still indicative of momentum and the amount of possessions.