Why not go one step further and trade offensive assets (glenn Watkins McCoy clay) for defensive assets. The great thing about Tyrod is that no matter who he plays with the offensive production is the same and comes down to Tyrod making a few plays.
The last 4 super bowl participants. 13 games against teams that have won at least 10 and usually 12 the the last two years. The other 3 against Brees, Luck, and Rivers.
I see a montage of Greggo imploring his players to attack the head, Dwight Clarke's catch which has now been removed from main reel and continued ratings reports indicating a collapse of the league as we know it.
Funny "Cordy Glenn" popped into my head just like many other posters. Question would have easily been "name one thing the organization did right the last decade".
The beauty of having a Tyrod offense is that it doesn't matter who is lining up at the skill positions. Everything is dependent in any case on whether tyrod breaks a long run or finds someone deep on a scramble. That said they should just invest in the D and count on tyrod to come up with 20 points somehow.
We are in like year two after a $160M restoration. It's that enough to get everyone off our backs about a stadium. I would introduce a $300M restoration in 8 years to buy another 10 years. Don't need a new stadium with amenities no one in WNY can afford anyway. No one is telling KC or Green Bay to build a new stadium. Refurbs are the way to go and that way we play outside indefinitely.
WR. The main reason is that Sammy while a legit #1 is not injury resistant enough to be franchised and signed beyond his first contract. A WR at 10 if selected well should assure the team has a veteran #1 as it auditions QBs over the next 3-4 years.
God help us. Did you see that game where Siemian tried to throw a Hail Mary from the opponent's 40 and he could not even get it to the 10. I'm okay with a bridge QB but not a noodle armed bridge at the Ralph where you need to be a bomber to even be able to think about minor successes.