VOR

Who? When?

Then again, if he shows enough as a WR, the Bills might keep him as the 6th WR instead of potentially losing him in the hopes of trying to sneak him on the PS.

True, he was dumb to not move the team to Seattle, or anywhere else, when he had the chance. Thank goodness for that!

I don't know about the best, or even if it's a hit (or a 1-hit), but I've always liked this song (found it in the Autograph link): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ph8kGPXOoUw...feature=related

No WR went in the first round. Does that mean they'll all have trouble getting off the line and getting separation? And how much trouble did Hardy have getting off the LOS and getting separation compared to the other rookie WR's? Take a look at their college stats. Hardy's are better than most of them, while his total TD's are sick.

It was Damon Huard: http://www.nfl.com/liveupdate/gamecenter/1...IN_Gamebook.pdf

I just don't see how Hardy could be anything other than the #2 WR going into the season, with Reed in the slot. Those are where they are best utilized, and at worst, Hardy commands attention given his great size and good speed.

I agree. Hardy needs to just be adequate at blocking to win the starting job. Reed is simply not a #2 WR.

One of TD's first moves as the new Bills GM was deciding between re-signing Marcellus Wiley or Eric Moulds. Both were pretty young and coming off good seasons, but only one could be re-signed, because of the cap mess Butler left, and TD chose Moulds. Had Cowart not suffered the Achilles, and given his age and the improved cap status, I think the Bills/TD would have re-signed him. In the case of Winfield, although he was good and young, the Vikes were offering him mad money (I believe he received an $8M roster bonus) and the Bills didn't believe he was worth it.

Yes, and that's by her cooking you breakfast the next morning.

He was never mobile to begin with, but you are correct.

Had he not gotten injured (while with the Bills), they never would have let him go in the first place.

With the fear of losing the team to Toronto, you'd have expected them to sell-out ALL the season tix.

Man those Achilles injuries are career killers. I think that Julian Peterson is the only guy to ever come back from one and play at the same level as before. It's a shame the Bills only got about 3 years out of Cowart before he suffered his. He could have been a perennial Pro Bowler for them.

Bingo. Let's worry about fielding the best 22 starting players before worrying about what would happen if they got injured and drafting their backups. But since we're on the topic, who are these "great backup LT's" that the league is replete with, outside of the Bills of course? Anyone?

If? I think his name has been penned-in on the depth chart as the starter. Same for Stroud.

It's not exactly "no new evidence." Goodell admitted months ago that the Patriots have been illegally videotaping since 2000, but didn't give specifics. Furthermore, that admission was largely (conveniently?) ignored by many. Now everyone knows the specifics.

Why? They are in denial and see the lack of a walk-thru tape as evidence that the Patriots are innocent.

He seems like a proud yet humble guy with talent, who is willing to work hard to improve. You can't ask for much more.

Obviously there is some advantage to taping on the field versus a press box, otherwise the rule wouldn't make a distinction. And I won't claim that this helped them beat the Bills, but it sure nullifies those 3-point last-second SB wins.

Prior to joining the Giants, Mitchell was an undistinguished MLB for the Chiefs. The Giants moved him to WLB, which may have been the reason for his good performance with them.

Yep, or if there is no NFL franchise in that city. Golisano can own the Sabres and Bills. But this looks like a prelude to eventually buying the Bills.

Re-read my post. Goodell stated that the Patriots have been videotaping (illegally) since 2000. He didn't name any other teams, nor have any other teams been accused of doing it. Therefore it's more than just a bunch of conspiracy theories and feel-good discussions. Why more hasn't been made of this, I don't know. But they're guilty no matter what Walsh produces, based on the Commish's admission, in light of getting caught red-handed in 2007.

The Commish already admitted that the Patriots have been illegally videotaping since 2000. So they've been cheating all along. And without anyone else being implicated, it's just been them. So there's really nothing more Walsh can add, other than a tape of the walkthrough which will allegedly earn Belichick a huge 1-year suspension. Please.

I'm predicting a Wings championship.