Jump to content

VOR

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,767
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by VOR

  1. She's probably lousy/a B word in bed as well. "You call yourself a stud?" "F$#%ing unbelievable!" What a physically attractive, but personality-ugly POS.
  2. The wife called me up to watch it. Yep, went exactly the way I said, in the other thread. What a B word.
  3. As I said, just because you're ignorant, don't assume everyone else is. And I know you think you know everything, but you obviously don't know all that much period, much less about me, so don't presume to tell me what I knew and when I knew it. The rumors about Garcia well predated TO's comments. But let me apologize for saying "everyone" thought Garcia was gay. Obviously not everyone did. And outside of being a dumb comment by TO, it wasn't the reason he left the 49'ers, which was the original point. He wanted out because he thought Garcia was a poser. Garcia is a taller version of Flutie. And the funny thing is, they played on the same team in the CFL (Calgary Stampeders), and they couldn't stand each other. I didn't recall that, but yes, that is correct. So yes, I was wrong in that regard. But TO still wanted a new contract from the Eagles and that was the main reason he tried to get himself out of there. And he succeeded in doing that AND getting a hefty new contract. It wasn't the 100th TD non-celebration, as you wrongly tried to claim. Huh? Where did that come from? But since you asked, TO made almost $32M in his 3 years in Dallas. Moss is making $27M over 3 years with the Patriots. So it was better money. I guess the extra ~$5M could be considered payment for the latter half of 2005. I read the article. "For the team’s highly paid quarterback to become a truly influential leader, the big man on campus had to be jettisoned." That tells me that Romo wasn't the leader of the offense, TO was. And given the money they had invested in Romo and his youth, they decided to build around him. Not to mention they (stupidly) gave-up a ton to get Roy Williams and had to justify their investment by making him the #1 WR, which wouldn't have sat well with TO (as it shouldn't have, since Williams isn't half the receiver TO is). We'll see if this is just another in the ever-growing list of mistakes by Jones (you think keeping Jauron is bad, what about keeping Wade Phillips?) or a masterstroke by Jerruh. I think you'll find that most people believe it is the former. The Cowboys made the playoffs in 2006, with TO out-catching Witten. So you haven't exactly thought it through, or at least you (are continuing to) think too simplistically.
  4. Ah, I get it now. I saw a promo for the show and saw TO tangled-up in the netting on that course. After hearing Ms. Potty Mouth, I realize that she's pissed that they did poorly in the event and that he's supposed to be a professional athlete and should do better. I won't be watching to find out that I'm right, so someone let me know.
  5. If you're a competitor, you're a competitor no matter what the venue.
  6. Well that cinches it. TO is a bad teammate because a lingere model says so. In more important news, John and Kate are getting a divorce!
  7. Cutting Ted Washington (prior to the 2001 season) was a killer for the defense. And then Cowart got hurt in the first game of the 2001 season and was never the same. Arrrrggggghhhh!
  8. More likely the event was caught by the dashboard video camera.
  9. The Bills should have drafted a DE with every pick. That way, one of them was sure to pan out.
  10. I gave you a because in my post, to which you replied after presumably reading it, I was replying to a poster who said that it looked like a case of DWB.
  11. Yeah, but the most important thing is, how great has he looked so far in camp?
  12. No one is trying to take them away. But when I look back at them, I mostly lament the ST's destroying the Bills' chances in the 1999 playoffs, with the ending of that Titans game. And most of the "Flutie haters" are just pointing out that a 56.2% completion rate, 7582 yards, 47 TD's and 36 turnovers in 30 starts and large parts of many other games, isn't "just winning," as many would like to believe. Those numbers are on-par with Trent Dilfer's SB-winning season in 2000. Now I'll give him credit for providing excitement in 1998, after the Kelly years were over and the reality of Todd Collins set-in. But it was largely a team effort. And Flutie was as shameless a self-promoter as you believe TO is. It's just that the internet and technology wasn't where it is now back then. Remember that he was cut by 2 teams before fleeing to the CFL, and then cut again with the Bills. And it wasn't because he was "relegated to the back of the bus."
  13. Sounds like an excuse for his poor performance last year, and for most of his career, save one year.
  14. I think most people have said that RJ was a bad QB. So being better than bad isn't really saying much. And in 2000, the teams Flutie beat were the Jets (in Buffalo) who were 9-7, the Pats (twice) who were 5-11, the Bears who were 5-11, and the Seahags who were 6-10. Not exactly the cream of the crop.
  15. I was waiting to comment until I got more facts, but I'm less inclined to believe it was DWB, since Bruce has a history of drinking and driving, failed the sobriety test, and refuse the breath test. It's the hypocrisy of the officer that gets me.
  16. That's a reasonable argument. But who is to say his skills didn't diminish during the 1999 season? Or even prior to joining the Bills? Again his stats in 1999 were far from impressive, most notably his completion percentage.
  17. How can a "pariah" be so well-liked by his teammates, and at least in the case of the Cowboys, the leader on offense? About the only place he could be considered a "pariah" is when it came to the Eagles and Cowboys' organizations, who "cast him out." But hey, never let it be said that Mr. WEO needs facts, or ever let them stand in his way.
  18. The point about Flutie being better than the poor RJ is a weak argument, but par for the course for a half wit like you, Mr. WEO. Because his time with the Chargers proved that he wasn't responsible for the Bills winning. Otherwise he would have "just won" there. It's not a hard concept, for people with even half a brain. And Flutie had 20 TD's and 20 turnovers in 1999, a 55% completion rate, and barely eclipsed 3,000 passing. JP had a similar season in 2006 and people were still ready to run him out on a rail.
  19. The Colts were far from "hapless" in 1999. They were 13-3 and the 2nd seed in the playoffs. In 1998, when Flutie "won" his first game with the Bills, yes the Colts were "hapless," at 3-13.
  20. Bingo. And they didn't have much talent on offense.
  21. Anyone care to explain why Flutie "just lost" in SD?
  22. LOL! "2 maybe 3 hall of famers?"
  23. The club seats would have sold, eventually. Ralph would have pushed the deadline back.
×
×
  • Create New...