After thinking about it, the only logical conclusion I can come to is that the Bills want to see if Peters is recovered from his injury before giving him the big bucks, as one poster mentioned. If that's the case, then I agree with them. They haven't seen, or heard from, him since January, so they don't know how he's doing. The troubling thing is that Peters chooses to stay away, which could mean the injury isn't healed, robbed him of some mobility +/- gives him chronic pain. I hope not.