DrPJax
-
Posts
1,020 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by DrPJax
-
-
1 hour ago, Simon said:
Did he finally get yanked?
I couldn't believe Belichik signed him.
Yep , the commentators were noting how he was being benched for “ ineffectiveness” , which Romo pointed out was not an actual measured stat! Three ints is certainly measurable tho. Hope this doesn’t light a fire for him next week; maybe coach B will start Stidham and that would be better for our struggling to contain d line. Running is the main way I see Cam being an issue for us.
-
9 minutes ago, WideNine said:
I was not a fan of the too cute double screen fake thing then ended up with Allen dirting the pass and our team getting called for illegal player downfield. We were in down and goal territory and the Jets were rushing 4 and we went 3 straight pass plays that were broken up.
I also feel like Allen rarely if ever gives up the ball on read option run plays. The reason it is called a read option is supposed to be Allen reading a specific defender or two has the option to give it to the running back or keep it. Allen has to take the option of giving the ball to the RB a few times to have that play work. At least three times today I saw the read option called where the running back had blockers and daylight yet Allen kept it and dove into a scrum of bodies.
Seemed the Jets knew that too, and I did not see them attack the running back on those options. Rather, they targeted Allen each time - you would think they might have spotted a hero-tendency or something.
I was saying the same thing today about the RPOS. Allen always keeps it. Not sure if he doesn’t trust the rbs or if it’s an old habit from college where he was the best / star player and so he just feels he is “ certain” to get the first down etc. It is a pattern that is noticeable by a novice like myself so I am sure this tendency is being keyed on by opponents. Let’s watch for this next week against the pats.
-
1
-
-
35 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:
I think they need to reduce the size of the playbook a little bit and dial down the complexity. Players in the past have already said its the most complicated they have seen, and that was before this year where he has clearly expanded the size of the playbook.
We are seeing too many dumb penalties on offense like illegal formations that have taken TD's off the board or killed drives. Get this offense into a rhythm, make it just a little less complicated and keep it fresh with Josh ability to improvise. Daboll is trying too hard on gimmick and trick plays. He calls too many, and has bad timing with it too.
Maybe just dial back the complexity and size just a little bit, at least until our offense gets healthy and get key guys back like Brown and Feliciano.
I was wondering your opinion on whether you think some of the penalties are occurring as josh sits quite awhile at the LOS, trying to use his hard count several times, and it seems to interfere with the lineman coming off at the snap aggressively and also sets them up for false starts. Seems like he uses this tactic much more now with no crowd present. Just a thought and value your observations. I also think Brown, who has more experience in this offense than everyone except Beasley, being absent is a huge detriment to this offense being run effectively. Perhaps when he returns at full health , the offense will approach what it was the first four weeks. I also think incorporating more running plays would effectively simplify things without limiting the type of formations and plays to draw from. What do you think?
-
6 hours ago, ProcessTruster said:
I thought the defensive strategy was pretty sound; gave up only 26 points to a team that would shredded them for 46 had they played press with 8 in the box due to lack of pass rush. the problem was the offense could not score , simple as that. Spags made a mess out of Josh's head. All good, Titans and Chiefs are the class of the AFC now and it showed.
I don’t think it’s sound strategy when you give 32 plus min in time of possession to the other team and never have the ball long enough to get into any offensive rhythm. Also those who keep saying this was successful because the Chiefs didn’t get their usual act plus 30 have flawed logic. The Chiefs TOOK what they NEEDED TO WIN , and they were never seriously challenged. They successfully passed when THEY NEEDED TO or WANTED TOO, and at the end they just passed for the game clinching fg with never any serious doubt that they couldn’t score almost on command. How many 4 th downs did our vaulted strategy force them into,,,,, oh yeah ,,,, one on 4 th and inches which they converted with blowing the line off on a 9 yard TD run. This was never close to being a sound strategy. They took what they wanted to WIN,,and Reid was way ahead of McDermott. Mcd is not a good big game coach. He is a perfectionist, and perfectionist’s flaws lie with needing to change just for the sake of change/ adjusting , they have to always tinker, adjust , and over and over Mcd over analyzes and these ever changing game plans keep his team from playing fast, aggressive football. They had 4 good games as a passing team, spreading the ball around. The change in D caused a huge TOP deficit that carried over and ruined the offense.
Mcd has 3 plus years of a record now and it’s around .500 as he beats bad teams and loses playoffs, majority of games against winning record teams, zero wins against the Pats, loses home games more than he should, tinkers with both lines just to tinker it seems ( after seeing tonight I can’t imagine what Murphy / Harry did to deserved being inactive given these results. who sends messages like this ? Perfectionists) He was completely out coached and no one will be crediting him with some amazing strategy, they are laughing at the moment just as the Chiefs were post game. We were never really in this game; the chiefs controlled the game as there are no moral victories because they scored less than usual. I love mc d as a culture / process guy. Good for human growth , yet he so far is an average game day coach. These are just the FACTS based on results up till this moment. Josh changed his game/ accuracy, maybe Mc D will become a better big game / playoff success type coach in time. FAILED STRATEGY TODAY ! 😉😀😊🍺
-
These two weeks and the four prior are about coaching. First month we dictated all offensive play with good gsme plans and execution. Then we play two legit contenders with good coaching and instead of sticking with what we are , we change coaching, game plans offensively, to react to them instead of playing like we had. The d also goes to deep drops, Lbs 8 yards off LOS, with no pressure , no spy’s on mobile qbs. No adjustments at half. Still no offensive plans in third quarter to allow us to score (. Maybe no huddle?)
Finally late , down two possessions we speed up tempo , score but cow has left the barn. We all knew we wouldn’t get the ball back before they were up by 9 or more. No adjustment by Frazier/ Mcd
REID DICTATED THE GAME. Never felt we were in it and announcers pointed it out. Mcd is looking like a 500 coach , he has NO playoff wins ( one was a bad blown lead) , NO win against the PATS. SO FAR, , NO wins against AFC contenders. ( raiders would beat us right now ) as Mcds schemes on d have been figured and countered. This is becoming a hard to deny pattern. Mcd goes conservative in bigger games and heis always out coached. Just the facts. A win against the Jets won’t fix this. Concerning history is developing. Hard to fully embrace our early success. imho.
-
3 minutes ago, Billever76 said:
gashed all day in the run game and you consistently have our safeties 25 yards deep off the snap..failed to get aggressive until the final chiefs drive and by then it was too late....cbs 10 yard cushions..edmunds on an island squatting in no mans land...no stacked boxes...no disguised coverages...no jamming the recievers at the line....no spy for a running qb etc etc etc.....mcdermott must make a statement....defense on pace to be the worst in franchise history.....with poyer/hyde/edmunds/tre white/milano that seems highly impossible
You actually nailed it on the head. Was going to post similar but you are spot on. I don’t get the sudden urgency at the end when it was missing all game. This staff is always a day late and dime ( spy, run blitzes, cbs creeping in late etc, ) short. Fanboys will be we are 4-2 , be happy. Big issue is we will not challenge for SB like this and Pats or fins may take division. Not impossible against team that can’t stop run or scheme well.
-
2
-
-
Didn’t see anything on Knox regarding practice but just saw on NFL network that he is listed as out with a calf injury. Is that true? If so this continues to be. a frustrating season from him / for him.
Lots of nagging injury issues this year. Not feeling great about our o line with all the shuffling and seeing the run blocking looking quite bad; just saw Cynthia has us losing 27-25. After Tuesday it’s difficult seeing how we keep it that close as we let Tenn score 6/6 in the red zone, which is horrid even given short field etc Also since Frazier is ok with Edmunds playing hurt, I could see Mahomes dropping dimes to his TE all day after play action right around, behind, in front of, and over our LBS. 5 games with the D regressing reminds me of our backing into the playoffs last year. I don’t think we can have any confidence our d will keep it reasonably close enough to allow Allen to pull it out in the 4 th ; hope I’m wrong. Our only chance lies in no turnovers and grabbing a couple from them. Let’s see how we respond.
-
Looking at his choice if the Chiefs says a lot. He wants a shot at a ring WITHOUT beingThe primary back. Fits with his present performance, he didn’t want to be THE guy or Miami would probably have been very attractive. I think he knows he is not the same back that was in Pittsburgh ; if he was still confident there is no way he would settle ,given his ego, to just be a role player getting 8-10 touches a game which is the likely scenario in KC. The big concern in my eyes is what does this say about Moss’s health. Why go after Bell ,who would have had to be released.? Jones, Yeldon, or is Moss close to IR with a nagging injury? I see this as concern because if they have faith in Moss, why go after a struggling vet back who has.not produced in three years? We all see the glaring CB , LB DL issues that if not addressed or miraculously improve will drag this team down, so it does raise a red flag perhaps about Moss that Mcbean felt they had to kick the tires on Bell. I think Bills being first out says they were looking for possible insurance if Moss’s injury drags on.
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, matter2003 said:
I don't like this...it effectively gives the Titans a major advantage because they screwed up and are now rewarded with extra time to prepare for us that we don't have.
Relax. They can’t even get in their building until at least Saturday. So it’s one day and they have 4-5 and perhaps more players who may be out because of COVID. Hardly any advantage. If any more people test positive , for example on Saturday or Sunday after they have been allowed back in the facility, they may lose even more practice time as the place is disinfected. Also it’s early In the season and the titans are missing valuable reps and a week of actual game play that can’t be simulated. The Bills , who need to sharpens their defensive schemes get an extra week of competition to prepare for he titans run game. So other than routine risk of injury , the Bills actually are in a better place and this FSU be seen as a positive for the Bills. No big advantage for the Titans ( plus it’s possible even the bills titans game could be postponed if more titans test positive ) , so just take a deep breath , wear a mask as they work, and worry about the Raiders which is a much more realistic competitive issue than any competitive perceived advantage for the titans. The titans have beaten up , barely, on weak teams and Having watched our offense , I am pretty certain we will go in as a favorite and I see them as much less of a threat now than what I was expecting prior to the season
. Friendly PSA as a dr with 40 plus years of clinical practice , look up the math plus protocol from eastern Virginia Med school and dr Marin. Very good advice from a great clinician (. Check his lecture on YouTube ) who published a well documented and received protocol for prevention and treatment, which myself and many colleagues are following as ONE method to reduce risk of getting and treating COVID. ( I am at risk being 63 and a PCP) THIS is a terrible virus that I would wish on. No one and I just mention the math plus protocol to look at because I hope all Bills mafia stay healthy and not everyone has time to keep up with all the studies and current therapies. I have no financial association with that protocol , just mention it for lay people to look at and discuss with their Drs, and wish to offend no one. Only mention it in light of the titans proving even young healthy athletes are not without risk. Stay positive ,,,,,about the Bills!
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Tolstoy said:
I thought it was an egregious call as well. Then I asked myself: what is the alternative? Remember that the Rams player had possession of the ball on the ground. So we have three options, maybe 4:
(1) Incomplete pass. Impossible. The ball never hit the ground.
(2) Kroft catch. Impossible. He didn't have possession at the end of the play.
(3) Catch and fumble? Impossible. Kroft didn't have possession long enough, and didn't make a "football move," whatever that is.
(4) Interception. As absurd as it is (since the Rams player didn't catch the darn ball), it seems more reasonable than the alternatives!
Am I mistaken here? I do prefer to blast the refs, but in this case they may not have had another call they could have made.
Ferreira in the booth as prior head of officials said it was an erroneous call. No other Option. He hit the ground with his butt as he had the ball. Cstch with possible offensive interference is only correct call. And offensive pi was a hard sell imho.
-
4 hours ago, billsfan89 said:
Jordan Phillips was bad against the run... In fact Star was there when the team went through a stretch of bad run defense last year. It was only scheme adjustments and improved play from the D-line that got the team on track when it hit that mid-year slump.
This is a good point and shows a trend. How many blowouts have we seen mcds defense give up over the years. And all the times it has been horrible run defense with our middle being gashed. How many times have we had to bring in players to help stop the horrific run defense!? I know we have seen this at least twice in mcds tenure. This time we fortunately didn’t lose because of such an improved offense but this is not a consistent way to win Needing 4 th quarter comebacks weekly.
Let’s hope this is not another 3 game stretch to get the run d corrected. Edmunds , if he was hurt should have been subbed. He was awful other than one hit. Trey also looked lost at times. Something is wrong with the scheme or communication. Rams are good but they came back from 28-3 and once again we should have easily cruised from that point. The terrible interception changed momentum but we still had an 11 point lead after that. Hard to explain that collapse but we have seen this too many times with this D. Remember Houston? No lead is safe with this situation. Is it Frazier , Mcd, or lack of leadership by vets? Not sure but this takes the luster from an amazing offensive performance. Maybe just an aberration,,,,but if it persists I bring up Zimmer , love, and consider more Dodson. Doubt we have cap space to add from outside. Great win but definite red flags. Btw, Wallace did have a nice pick in first half. Our d line was getting some pressure early but that disappeared in second half. -
HBD SDS! Thx for so many wonderful years here and fostering this amazing family and community that sets the standard for all things Bills ! Wishing you good health and I hope this football season provides some much needed relief from all stressors political , racial, COVID, and financial related and hoping to one day meet you in person as we finally celebrate our elusive Super Bowl title ! 😀😀🎂🍰🍸🍺🏈
-
4 minutes ago, PirateHookerMD said:
The national narrative is that Singletary his fumbling problems and Allan is suspect and Diggs won't be enough.
Finally time to see if it is all true!
I have to admit I am a little skeptical that McD has addressed the O enough to keep up with KC , RAVENS, and even the Titans who also got aggressive with their D by adding Clowney. New O additions of Diggs , and three rookies ( Moss, Davis, Gilliam ) , with a tight end room with Knox being the only one with much upside and an o line basically unchanged, does not show a great deal of change that will guarantee , IMHO, a vastly improved offense that can score more than 19 points a game. McD , who has had great success with his D, continued to bring in more support with adding several proven defensive veterans and even opted to take Epenesa when JK Dobbins had fallen into our lap (a 2000 yard proven rusher from a major conference who was immediately nabbed by the Ravens to bolster their already impressive rushing attack), appears to keep his emphasis on defense even after we are seeing the leagues more successful franchises featuring very productive offenses. We can’t ignore KC’s ability to score and they added even more fire power to their O. The road to the SB will most likely go thru KC or Baltimore for the AFC teams as I see the Bills as a 10/11 win team given the schedule. We still have zero playoff wins with McD ( love the guy and love his culture, but he needs improvement as losing a 16 point lead in the wild card game reflects on a need for game management improvement ), and I am not sure just adding Diggs and three rookies ( 4 if we include Bass) in a COVID shortened season translates to more offensive success on the road against already proven offensive juggernaut franchises. We did also lose to Baltimore at home last year so we can’t just downplay them either as I routinely see little mention of them as a team we might have to go thru to get to the SB.
So, did we do enough on O? Not sure until we see if Allen can progress as I am hoping he does , and I also have to see if Daboll can use Diggs and Moss creatively in a way that matches all the preseason hype. So far McD continues to be very aggressive with addressing his D, but I am not sure he has done enough to get the offense up around 24/25 points a game where we can actually be a bona fide Super Bowl contender. Peter King suggesting the fins take the division is ludicrous, but we are not locks to knock off KC, TITANS , RAVENS , and the SB is really the ultimate goal. It’s about to get real!
-
2
-
-
6 hours ago, buffalover4life said:
It still had to be even worse in 2018. This video is comical. some fantastic passes in there though
Wow thanks for posting that. It’s absolutely startling to see those strung together from supposedly “professional “ receivers! I don’t know how Josh could ever trust throwing to Zay or Foster any longer, except he was not provided with any other options! It still amazes me how long jones was kept on and it certainly makes me think after foster disappearing as a receiver last year that if any of the draft picks can be an effective gunner ( not difficult imho), he will be off the roster. We didn’t miss him in the playoff game ( I don’t think he was active was he? ) so I don’t see how he makes the roster if any of these new guys can catch ( not becoming Zayisms themselves) . It sounds like McBean will no longer tolerate that type of ineptitude and rightfully so when this is a critical year to determine if Josh will be our long term franchise Qb, which I firmly believe he prove himself to be with a true #1 receiver In addition to cutting his fumbles. After seeing a video like that it’s no wonder we can’t score points effectively. Pretty revealing video and point by OP documenting how badly Allen has been hurt by drops.
-
Hope he stays away from Pats, we need a break. Dalton would be instant starter in Jacksonville, should easily beat out Minshew the mustache! Odd that they didn’t draft a qb, doubt they will stick with a 6 th round pick long term with no competition. Hope this happens just to keep him out of our division and away from pats. No way is he coming to B lo after we used a 5 th for a long term back up solution.
-
7 hours ago, Aussie Joe said:
I would suggest that like Moss, they ultimately stayed put and the guy they were going to pick was there when they picked...Maybe a lesson of patience was learned..I would still rather that generally they let the draft come to them and use those fourth and fifth round picks to throw a few darts..
They seem to be drafting pretty well these past few years so the more guys they can look at in a Training camp the better..
Hey Joe, post draft Beane admitted he tried to trade up in 3 rd round as much as 7 spots. However, the other gm procrastinated until 2 min left on the clock and Beane pressed him because if clock ran out another team cold have jumped them for moss defeating the. Trade. So the trade fell thru, not because of Beanes restraint. He talked with others who also delayed and stood on their pics. Actually Beane admirer he got lucky moss was there or as he said “ I would not have been in the same mood I am now “. I am in minority I know, but this is why I didn’t like the espensa pick that much. Dobbins was right there for the taking , a 2000 yd, 3 down back who is a good receiver. ESpenesa fell because of lack of quickness , 31 other teams who also love edge rushers and no one pulled the trigger. He may turn out ok but we have other edge guys from free agency and last years pics so I am not sure we will see the same production from espensa he had in college.
Maybe, but dobbins was rated the # 1 back on many boards including the ravens asmststed by Harbaugh who was relieved to get him. He was good enough for the ravens who had the #1 rushing attack last year as having watched himthe past two years, imho he is a special talent. On the other hand moss is a change of pace, bruiser those unlikely to break long runs but does break many tackles. He is a good addition , but not as good as dobbins , and should motor go down , I am not sure moss is a 3 down back and Beane said this much. He was very honest in post draft interviews.
I love Beanes work here and really like most of his pics and he is very good at free agency. I just wonder if this may come back to haunt us similar to passing on mahomes ( trust me I do love Allen here now tho, but mahomes I’d very special), as we may have to go thri the ravens for the SB, and I dread thinking of Dobbins running thru us for a win. Only time will tell. But Beane admittedly got lucky with moss being there and if we w
didnt land moss, espensa and not having an adequate 2nd rib ( also Beane said we will always be a RB by committee and “ clubs usually don’t have workhorse backs any longer” ) would have made this an average draft imho. Love the rest of the pics with exception of fromm only because I thought it was too early for a definite backup qb whose strength is on the meeting room and not necessarily on the field with a noticeable weak delivery as stated by several draft analysts watching him at the combine. Great wr pics, and kicker looks solid. My thinking on JK was bring him in and see who wins starting job as it not like Singletary is firmly entrenched for years as the starter. That way we have two equally solid 3 down backs should injury occur. I am nitpicking cuz as Beane admitted, luckily it worked out. But Beane was not showing restraint as he tried to trade up and then maybe we don’t get Fromm, a kicker or secoond wr this in the draft as he was offering a 6 th or 7 th pic as he vaguely admitted too. Maybe this will be a lesson learned for a young gm He admitted rb was a glaring need and they got lucky with moss, but also might have gotten greedy with espensa as that was not as pressing a need but Beane felt the value was too high to pass.
just some thoughts based on my liking of jk and Beanes candor in post draft interviews. Hey espensa and moss are Bills and i hope both are hugely successful. We have a lot,of work to do to catch the chiefs and ravens if we want to contend for the Conference. We still have not won a playoff game in 24 years so all the rose glasses are lost on me till we actually get home playoff games and advance ! I hope it Happens in my lifetime as I am 62 now and being in medicine, this corona virus admittedly has me pretty skittish!??. Best wishes.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, buffalover4life said:
We have been social distancing for 5+ weeks. we should have an idea of who has and does not have covid-19.
I have been very careful for 5+ weeks and believe at this point it is safe to visit my family... these are small gatherings and I wouldn't take anymore from these players than has already been taken.
And this is proof why we need professionals sometimes having to dictate behavior for their will always be those who because they can’t see it , don’t believe it is there or will ever affect them. We have very little ides of who has had it , who may be asymptomatic carriers are this point ( may be as high as 14-15% in some communities ), and therefore one has little knowledge who to avoid or who should still be in quarantine still to avoid endangering elderly , those with hypertension , diabetes etc. One player lost his grandfather 2 weeks prior to the draft to covid 19, and we are just beginning to see new infections level off ( not disappear!) so having these groups of people MAY indeed cause some to lose more if some at risk people get unknowingly exposed. I hope it doesn’t happen, but hoping will not prevent it and people should not drop their guards as this virus will be around in waves over the next year. And I know you are thinking, well it’s all young people at these gatherings, and covid is no big deal for the young. Unless you happen to be one of the 20 , or 30 year olds that did die, and realize that 55% of hospitalizations are in the age group from 20-50. My point is don’t feel sorry for what little “ has been taken “ from these players as they can still lose much more valuable things ( like grandparents ) by making seemingly harmless decisions to group together before wide testing or a vaccine is available. No time to let your guard down, it is still dangerous for many people. Hope your family is well and safe tho!
-
On 3/28/2020 at 5:43 PM, Nitro said:
Gave up a lot of sacks last week but that could be due to coming off an injury. Still would like to see them draft OL talent this year.
Pretty sure OP meant last year. He is correct as Williams gave up 12 sacks last year which was the worst of all guards. His best year was 2017 where he rated out as a top 5 RT. Had injuries and moved to guard which apparently didn’t turn out well. Perhaps he will compete for backup at RT as I doubt he will beat out Ford unless he returns to his 2017 form.
-
12 hours ago, BuffaloRebound said:
Damn. 50 votes is a crazy thin margin. Media made it seem like it was definitely gonna pass.
1019-959 =60 Not so crazy thin!?? Glad it passed. People were watching the XFL, and now are worrying about a watered down playoffs ( not addressing this to you ).
It’s still playoff football in the best league available so I will always take that over a substandard product trying to compete or mimic it. One thing will always be certain, viewers will always be in control of their own tv and viewing habits. So if someone is that concerned over one more playoff game, don’t watch it. I did that with the xfl crap before our unfortunate novel virus epidemic and I haven’t lost any sleep over not watching it. Hoping this improves the Bills chances next year with what looks like a challenging schedule. ?
-
1
-
-
20 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:
He didn’t disappear - Michigan and Wisconsin slid 2-3 guys his way which only cleared the way for other guys for sacks but he was a big impact. Against Clemson he had 10 pressures and 4 QB hits!
Still had double teams in prior games and his performance tapered off. Ok , maybe disappear was not good word choice for Clemson , but while credited with pressure in stats , he did not make impact plays relative to all the hype. Clemson qb ran in areas he vacated with his speed rush outside. He made a couple of good plays in that game but I don’t think he is the best or second best player coming out. Heck LSU’s d line making more plays tonight. Bosa seemed to make plays more often and he drew attention away from Chase when he played for the buckeyes. The Ohio state d had an unimpressive final two games ( saying this as a buckeye fan, from Ohio , did all my college in Ohio etc so biased toward them ) and the results spoke for themselves. He did make a lot of plays early In the year and was dominating games with strip sacks etc but his production tailed off. I’m not looking up stats but watched every Ohio state game for years, and his play was not the same after the suspension. Despite the “ pressures” , I’m sorry , but the Clemson qb did whatever he wanted and I can’t remember any momentum changing plays from the d line in that game. I see him as a good pro but I still think bosa will be better. Time will tell. Being from Ohio , I would have to think you were unimpressed with chase and the d in that game , no? ?
-
1 minute ago, Putin said:
I think 2nd overall is the DE from Ohio state forgot his name
Chase young. Watched all his games for two years. Good end. Don’t know why he disappeared the last few games after his suspension. Was also absent in Clemson game. Speed rusher. Don’t see lots of other counters. I am a Ohio State fan and honestly he no where near bosa ( 49 ers edition) just based on later part 2019 season. Maybe he will blossom in the nfl but I think he is overrated. Saw him neutralized quite often last season. Would take him at 22 tho!
-
Interesting debate thread; I just wonder how most people will feel IF Mcd sticks with the same roster ( no duke , Yeldon , Sweeney as Foster, L Smith , and DiMarco stay active ) and we happen to lose 18+ vs our 17 point production that we have even struggled to produce the final month of the season. Yes , imo it is a successful season overall with team , roster improvement etc, but is a one and done playoff appearance acceptable for a Staff with its second playoff appearance in a season where the AFC title is not a forgone Pats certainty ? We all
now expect to keep making the playoffs in the future but why let an opportunity go by when just perhaps taking some roster “ risks” could have a huge payoff given our D consistency?
Many have advanced the argument about not losing special team efficiency by removing a gunner , Foster, who we might all agree has had little to zero offensive impact. I think his role is being overstated. I have watched every game , play , and Imo our field position battle is mostly dependent on our punters effectiveness. Rarely has the gunner determined the outcome of field position. I would argue if we are so concerned about returns that we have to keep a roster spot just for Foster, why not take the returns out of the equation and punt directionally to eliminate returns? Other teams do this and if there is a chance we can add one more weapon for our anemic pass production ( we are what 24, 25 th in the nfl ?) in a one game win or go home scenario, I would favor that. How about some creative special teams coaching, and do something the Texans don’t expect. Do I think Mcd will “ stay in the foxhole “ as another poster coined an analogy, unfortunately yes. I hope I am wrong and Mcd has the courage to take a small risk for a possible large return. One and done with no attempt to help this offensive lack of production would feel like a let down and would raise some concern about if our staff can adjust to produce a super bowl winner, contender consistently as is their mission statement.
So I don’t see adding Duke at the expense of Foster or a safety as scrapping our prior whole season of special team or defensive game plan. What I am suggesting is that this offense, based on the last month, is not capable of winning without a stellar defensive game, and now we face teams who have shown they are capable of easily putting 20 plus up even despite the best defenses. I don’t see us winning in the playoffs with less than 20 points. I would love to see us take a chance to jump start this offense with more creative play calling ( how bout another Smoke td pass), some unexpected personnel moves ( Duke , Yeldon to active squad ) , urgency to score ( only one td on our opening drive in 2019, can’t we script more effectively early to help Josh?), go deep more like the 2 successful plays against the pats, be willing to throw some 50/50 balls if we get in the red zone because fgs aren’t going to cut it, knock off the predictable first down handoffs to Singletary plunging into the line, etc.
One person I wouldn’t mess with is Roberts ; he may not have returned any for tds yet but the guy is money on punts and he never lets the ball hit the ground. That alone always helps us win the field position battle and he has been close to breaking it in several punt returns. So, we all saw what Yeldon , Sweeney, Williams did against a good jets D. Williams caught the game winning td against the Titans yet has barely seen the field since. It’s all on the line this Saturday and if Mcd sticks with keeping all those options off the table and we should lose because our O fails to produce again, will you be satisfied that “we showed we could play with them and it came down to that last drive”? Hey , a loss is a loss and you still go home for a long off season. I think this is a winnable game IF we step up to “ championship caliber “ coaching and chance to win , not to just not lose. Willing to be humble, rejoice if the process stays the same and we win a low scoring ( offense scores less than 20) game, but I think a few tweaks and we end up in the AFC championship!
-
Buffalo ,, sometime you are going to have to take them seriously! Quote of the day ! What a great win. ??
-
24 minutes ago, TheJauronClap said:
Dabol did not call a bad game josh missed throws to receivers that were open
Not trying to be difficult but ;
giving a running back who is avg. over 5 yds a carry 8 touches is by definition bad play calling !
0 targets for your highly paid free agent TE is by definition bad play calling or bad game planning and speaks to a lack of identity for the offenseplaying foster over Williams and then targeting him once or twice is again bad game planning. Having your kick returner suddenly getting more targets than foster and expecting him to suddenly be comfortable catching the ball under game pressure is bad game planning and bad play calling.
never scoring points in the third quarter speaks to bad game planning, again what is this offenses identifying principle? Can you define it ?When your slot receiver is the sole deep target on a critical down, game planning is questionable and again what is the philosophy of the passing game plan? It’s not productive and scoring 14 points is not GOOD or acceptable and the OC is responsible for the game plan.
When your offense is confused and huddling as the clock runs down in the game defining drive , that is poor preparation and speaks to poor coaching. Isn’t Daboll responsible for the offense in that situation ?
The product speaks for itself. If you think it’s just on Josh , isn’t it the OC s job to design an offense around the capabilities of your given talent ?
I agree Josh is a work in progress. Daboll has a history of poor performing offenses and this is just another notch in his belt, by now he is what he is. Josh at least has a chance to develop. There is something wrong with the chemistry between daboll and Josh as the product now doesn’t work. Much easier to try a new OC than draft a new QB. Just like whisenhunt was responsible and dismissed its time for Mcd to salvage this situation imho.-
4
-
A Few Thoughts About the Jets Game, in no particular order
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Just wondering , how many games have there been where the winning team NEVER PUNTED, NEVER SCORED A TD ? Pretty unusual I would think. Tried to find some records but could not find this as a specific category. I did see an article in 2014 where the Buffalo Bills lead the NFL in wins without scoring a td at a total of 12 , but again that was in 2014. Could not find how many times we also concurrently never punted in those games. Just seems like without scoring a td, the offense is likely not clicking, and you would see punts during that game.
We are part of the record in 1992 where neither team punted ( against San Fran ), but I could not find the stats for winning without scoring a TD in a game while also never punting. Seems like a pretty unusual combination. Most fgs attempted by a single team in a game is 9 I believe. So maybe we witnessed a historic performance by the Bills? If anyone finds out more about that performance ( 0:tds, 0 punts while winning) , would be interesting to know !