hey beerball, I'm not sure who is right in this argument I just wanted to point out that if someone uses a design that is in the public domain (and it wasn't protected), then the public is free to use it. I'm not sure the exact laws around it, but you keep implying in a sarcastic manner that a user claimed Ralph is a thief and stole it. That's not the case and no one is saying (unless I missed someone saying it haha). They are saying that the bills organization used a design in the public domain; which is legal, free, and would not make anyone a thief. Just trying to point out the other side of the argument.
Again I have no idea where this design came from