SDS

So, in taking a fresh look at the latest release of our current software, a new feature caught my eye: Clubs This is the IPB answer to Facebook groups. It would allow the creation of user created clubs/groups within the community. https://invisioncommunity.com/news/new-clubs-r1017 There is a lot to digest in that article about the feature. It is VERY intriguing. I'd like to hear some feedback on this and if anyone could see a use for them.

I was just responding to the assertion that there are members in there that don't post nor read and would leave if the shoutbox were removed. Needless to say, I never made a suggestion that I was purposefully removing it - I was just unaware if a third-party module have been written for the version of the software I have been looking at.

Again, I was playing devils advocate here. The point being we have two large categories of customers here. Content creators (who also read) and content readers (who don't create). We cater to them both. I'm told this third group doesn't fall into either category. How much concern should I have for them then?

To play devil's advocate - why should this make my priority list if members have checked out of the community and just hide in the corner using a web based texting feature?

Odds are I will keep all of the content. But that's just my current preference. It looks like there is a shout box add-on already developed so hopefully it has the proper functionality that everyone wants to see.

These suggestions are not practical. I'm not fielding requests to import individual threads.

yeah, that might not be back for awhile. Someone would have to write an add-on for that. I don't know if/when it would be available. We have never allowed images in signatures. The text one will probably go too. People upload stuff all the time.

Basically, the thought process behind NOT bringing over 4.5M posts is: 1. Linking structure. Converting old links to new links may be just a rewrite of the URLs but it gets messy. 2. An empty database means the new code should be lightning fast. And fast for a very long time.

Despite the inevitable STD, what is unusable about them? Because I am almost certain to use the same software. (It almost appears as though they are using the beta-software that is out now. I'm not sure.)

That site will give you herpes. You should be talking about the Sabres on SabreSpace.

We have 4.5 Million posts, but for the most part it is a slow moving chat room. I'm not sure many threads are revisited after a couple weeks have past. If/when I migrate the forum to a contemporary software package - should I just leave the 4.5M posts behind and just transfer the structure and user accounts over? That would mean every forum would start fresh, but there would be a link to the old archives. Any opinions?

These tomatoes are sort of a big thing so it won't be hidden on the label. It will say in big bold letters on them. Just do a Google search and you can see the different types of brands and packaging out there. I get them at my local grocery store which is nothing special.

We get the pre-formed ones. I tried the dough balls and there isn't enough flour or cornmeal in the world to get me to do that again. Could not manage getting it off my peel without making the kitchen a disaster. The pre-made ones we have in our store are fine with the family and they come with a parchment incorporated. Easy peezy.

It has to be San Marzano tomatoes. Read up on them. http://www.thekitchn.com/whats-the-deal-14-16365

Has that thing landed yet? It floated like a dandelion seed.

You want an easy sauce? Just crush a big can of San Marzano tomatoes, drain and add some salt. Done. Works well for Margherita pizzas. Just slice some buffalo mozzarella and add basil leaves at the end. We also use a baking steel instead of stone (bakingsteel.com). Cooks each pizza WAY faster and allows a better crust where you get that light and dark mottled bottom that isn't burned, but yet fully cooked. Screw making your dough. We get the pre-made stuff from the store that comes on it's own parchment paper.

I didn't see the play. With that said, Badol is right.

[This is an automated response]<br /><br />As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive topic titles. A single name if far too vague to post as a title and provides little insight into what specifically the post is talking about.<br /><br />The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate.<br /><br />Thank you.

The charging bison may be the only logo in professional sports to have obvious genitalia dipicted.

That's weird.

Honestly, they are both Buffalo logos. The Bills aren't represented.

[This is an automated response]<br /><br />The topic title needs some TLC... The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate.<br /><br />Thank you.

[This is an automated response]<br /><br />The topic title needs some TLC... The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate.<br /><br />Thank you.

[This is an automated response] The topic title needs some TLC... The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.

[This is an automated response] The topic title needs some TLC... The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.