SDS

Really, you just need to start a tipping thread to see what people really think about money...

It is more like, you go to one site and list what they have. Then you go to site 2, etc... Those are our time stamps not theirs.

I should also add that despite the fact the paywall went up 7 weeks ago or so... I haven't devoted any time to our display of the issue because I knew I was redesigning the front page. Now that it has been up for a day or so, I can start to evaluate the best way to present the information. And a follow on point, I believe in promoting real journalism. I don't live in NYC, but I subscribe to the the NYT. They do good work. I also have always driven traffic to content producers to help them get paid. I believe the hometown newspaper needs to be supported, so the answer is that TBD will always support them as long as I own the site. That's my prerogative. I have not settled on the best way to support subscribers and non-subscribers. I implemented an icon as a first cut. Now, I will evaluate our next step.

Where did you get the Venn diagram showing TBD readers and BN subscribers. That would be good info to have. Pass it along! You can subscribe to Bills news only. It's $3 per month. I would think out of town Bills fans would be a prime audience.

I literally have an entire subforum dedicated to feedback from the community. I'm never upset to hear constructive feedback. I don't get nearly enough. However, I'm not fond of selfish complaining.

No, he didn't. He made demands. He backed it up with false assertions. After facing resistance, he changed his story completely and pretended it was his original point all along. I'm not a fan of that style of argument. I had already been thinking about BN article placement well before the suggestion was floated on page whatever. I have several options that I'm considering. I'd be happy to discuss them with reasonable people. Posting a topic title that says Stop linking to Buffalo News articles isn't a suggestion.

Do you have anything constructive to add?

I'm not sure why this was closed and moved, but given the recent redesign it is a relevant topic.

Quote: "Stop linking to Buffalo News aritcles" Now, is this a simple request to rearrange the articles? Was this mentioned in your original post? Your argument has changed with every post. Now, if you actually requested, as opposed to placing demands, that the BN links not be at the top of the list in the morning - we can have a conversation. Demanding from me that we do something to fit your personal taste is not an invitation for constructive dialog.

Do you not see these icons?

Your ignorance of 2017 is astounding. Please feel free to visit the website of probably the world's finest newspaper - The New York Times and tell me what you see (they do give 10 free articles per month). Then go to the Washington Post. Then the Wall Street Journal, the LA Times... Go ahead. I'll wait.

Two Bills Drive is free. I haven't collected a dime from you and yet here you are actually conversing with the owner. 42 articles were posted today October 19th. 21 Articles were from the Buffalo News and 21 articles were from other sources. That is 50%, not 99%. Are 21 articles, plus summaries from the BN not enough to keep you satisfied?

And what about the fans who subscribe to the Buffalo News? Should they not have their news aggregated? "99%"... Exaggeration doesn't help make your case. 99 articles out of 100 are not from the the Bills hometown newspaper. Telling me something that isn't true isn't the way to convince me of anything. I have clearly indicated which articles are from the News and which ones are not by the lock icon preceding the titles. If anything, you are getting some paid content for free in the quote we provide.

We have had complaints.

You might want to indicate that for those who aren't involved in other threads, etc...

Please explain?

Please refrain from commentary not pertaining to the information Josh has asked for. Thanks.

I have already said multiple times that the purpose of those clubs would not be to do that.

So, to wrap your mind around this feature - all it really is are user created forums arranged in a club directory as opposed to me creating them and slotting them in a rigid layout as we do now. And as I mentioned above - this wouldn't be for people to create their own little Bills discussion groups.

I think my only initial objection would be sub groups to discuss the Bills. I wouldn't want any splintering of the larger discussion elsewhere.

I'm not making any assumptions here. I'm wondering how people might see themselves using such a feature. Fantasy football discussion for TBD leagues. The Garbage Plate club Regular road trip travelers Etc...

I more than likely will do something over the bye weekend. I'm either going to upgrade the front page or upgrade the forums. The front page needs the most help to be honest but this is a close second.

So, in taking a fresh look at the latest release of our current software, a new feature caught my eye: Clubs This is the IPB answer to Facebook groups. It would allow the creation of user created clubs/groups within the community. https://invisioncommunity.com/news/new-clubs-r1017 There is a lot to digest in that article about the feature. It is VERY intriguing. I'd like to hear some feedback on this and if anyone could see a use for them.

I was just responding to the assertion that there are members in there that don't post nor read and would leave if the shoutbox were removed. Needless to say, I never made a suggestion that I was purposefully removing it - I was just unaware if a third-party module have been written for the version of the software I have been looking at.

Again, I was playing devils advocate here. The point being we have two large categories of customers here. Content creators (who also read) and content readers (who don't create). We cater to them both. I'm told this third group doesn't fall into either category. How much concern should I have for them then?