SDS

In general, I haven't because historically I just put stuff like hypertension and weight gain out of my mind. I'm probably consuming less now that I am 3 weeks into an eating better, losing weight state of mind. Hoping to make lifestyle changes where I nail all my breakfast and lunch meals, decent dinners and then just have stuff I want Fri/Sat night. With regards to celery: https://health.clevelandclinic.org/celery-may-help-bring-your-high-blood-pressure-down/

Two things I can eat that bring down my BP are celery and watermelon. Celery will do it in modest amounts. I've only noticed it in watermelon during the summer when I eat a boatload of it. Celery can be magical though.

[This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive topic titles. A better title will help the community find information faster and make your topic more likely to be read. The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.

[This is an automated response] This topic is no longer contributing positively to the community and therefore the discussion has been closed. Thank you.

Fair enough.

Either explain ASAP, or out ya go.

Honestly, anything breaking gets posted here by someone within minutes if not seconds. Save the bookmark mark to your home screen on your phone. Granted, it isn’t a text alert, but how quickly do you need the news that checking in once/twice per day doesn’t scratch the itch?

That article wasn’t what I was looking for. There is an NFL one that said the same thing, specifically addressing regression to the mean. http://archive.advancedfootballanalytics.com/2009/02/fighter-pilots-and-firing-coaches.html?m=1 http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/18400460/does-firing-head-coaches-nfl-lead-more-wins-2016

This analysis has already been done. They have found that coaching changes are near meaningless to a team’s record. What happens is a coach gets a string of bad luck, has a poorer than normal record and the next season the team regresses to the mean making the new coach appear better out of the gate. But it doesn’t last. I dont remember who did the analysis. Maybe the author of the The Black Swan or someone like that. http://freakonomics.com/2012/12/21/is-changing-the-coach-really-the-answer/

This analysis has already been done. They have found that coaching changes are near meaningless to a team’s record. What happens is a coach gets a string of bad luck, has a poorer than normal record and the next season the team regresses to the mean making the new coach appear better out of the gate. But it doesn’t last. I dont remember who did the analysis. Maybe the author of the The Black Swan or someone like that.

I was not aware of this. Not a bad idea.

[This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive topic titles. A single name if far too vague to post as a title and provides little insight into what specifically the post is talking about.The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.

Let the planning begin.

I think fans get wrapped around the axle with the BPA/need business. My interpretation has always been drafting for need means taking a guy you DON'T want to take (at least at that time) just because he plays in a position of need on your team. The proverbial "reach".

[This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive topic titles. A single name if far too vague to post as a title and provides little insight into what specifically the post is talking about.The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.

@Guffalo

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

[This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive topic titles. A single name if far too vague to post as a title and provides little insight into what specifically the post is talking about.The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.

I don't mean to pick on you personally, because a ton of fans make the same claims, but these takes are the absolute worst. Coach is forced to coordinate talentless group. The talentless group does not perform well. Therefore, coach must suck. It's just so unbearably awful.