SDS

yeah, we are currently debating whether we want to make the jump from babysitters to thought police. We'll tally your vote...

I thought your posts WERE your BM's??? LOL

I hope you weren't uncomfortable looking out your bedroom window that whole time... Did you change out of your jammies to take that picture? LOL!

I think it was Rerun from What's Happening....

errr... we do????

Roosevelt was gay?

who is John Kerry?

I don't know why this is so hard to find - according to this website, it is the top choice: Search Engine Results

actually, if you believe those silly little political tests on the net - I am the reigning conservative king on PPP. Ironically, Rich is a close second, yet strangely I have yet to agree with a single thing he has posted.

Rich in Ohio called me a flaming liberal when he 1st started posting here!

the last one is my favorite although Basic Instinct is pretty damn good.

work safe.... http://www.columbia.edu/~rhee/

hey, our ideas won, but lets just go with your ideas that lost and we'll all be happy!!!! what a bunch of BS. If bipartisanship was the goal we would do away with elections and have the entire govt split 50/50 and force it all to work... Let me tell you a story about bipartisanship. George Bush Sr. wanted to be a "uniter". He wanted to work together with those bipartisan-loving democrats who have nothing but goodness flowing through their veins. Sure he made a pledge not to raise taxes, but hey - let's work together! So, the democrat Senate Majority leader George Mitchell crafted the tax increase - with threats to shut down the govt if it wasn't passed - and Bush took the bait. He wanted to be a uniter. So, he signed the infamous Mitchell tax increase into law and then Mitchell and his band of bipartisan-loving democrats proceeded to lop the balls off that fuggin' promise breaking republican.... I'm sure GB is happy he extended his hand across the aisle... So spare your breath about bipartisanship. You people will never vote for a republican anyway, so go pound sand. Or better yet - make a cohesive argument for your ideas, change minds, and win elections. I'm guessing you'll forego trying to move the electorate with ideas. You'll just spend time pissing on those crazy religious people.... then in 4 years I can watch again as you all scratch your collective asses about why you can't win a state between MD and CA.

Interesteing.... just the other day he was talking about "two Americas". Did that go away? Did the wind shift again? That's what I thought.

nice, but those are all 3am chicks.... the real prize was the Supreme Court. (hopefully some old coots will retire).

Unfit for Command perhaps?

if you want, I'll kick you in the balls to take your mind off the election.

my untrustworthy political hack sources claim that Hotline says Mason-Dixon was the winner. Pew is close also (nationally at least).

That is a mighty fine piece of analysis. I wish I knew who the panel was...

I believe these were HIS 5:00 pm predictions on how the race would go.

with a single bullet????

facts suck... move on.

errrr.... negative cowboy. Guliani, Powell, and Patiaki could never get the nomination. Arnold is ineligible. Cheney is near death with his heart (not to mention he is now a liability). Allen is your only possibility there.

[shannen Coffin] My post from Monday: 286-252. That's my prediction. Bush holds Ohio and Florida. Picks up NM and IA. NH, overrun by Massachusetts libs who can talk a good game about the need for higher taxes but can't back it up by paying them, flips to Kerry. I wouldn't be entirely surprised, however, if I'm wrong on Wisconsin, which I currently have as a Dem hold. Actually, I wouldn't be entirely surprised if I am wrong on the entire damnable enterprise, since I rarely get these things right. I was just hoping I could have something else to laugh at NRO editors about (in addition to the Red Sox Series win), so I am taking a free shot. Posted at 01:02 PM

he doesn't. he cannot get the nomination.