Jump to content

SDS

Administrator
  • Posts

    10,202
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SDS

  1. I missed it. Did he go off on a rant?
  2. And for what it’s worth, although logically you go for two points first when down by 9, statistically it is shown not to matter. Logically it is not a debate. You are right. But when 538 ran the Numbers, it didn’t make a difference. Basically if you miss the two point conversion it doesn’t really matter when you miss it. You lose.
  3. Al Michaels is bad at basic logic.
  4. I’m going to set up a new topic regarding this. I’m going to have people fill out the blank map on the 270 site and then post the screenshot. I’ll try and figure out a prize for this. I think the best thing would be able to be transfer something via email.
  5. I didn’t get it all, but this topic got way off track with a lot of personal back-and-forth. I just sort of mass deleted a whole slew of posts - no offense, but this train took a left at Albuquerque and we weren’t going that way.
  6. I hope they right that ship to a cool 6-10.
  7. Adam Gase post-game.
  8. The question is what is he rated in the year 2020? I think it’s certainly less than when he was drafted.
  9. Trigger has spoken.
  10. oh, unless it’s 2000 and I expect a winner to be declared way before then. But that might not be a bad selection given that it is a tiebreaker anyway.
  11. I like it. Tie breaker goes to? National vote margin takes a really long time to sort out. Like six months. What would be quicker, yet still interesting?
  12. Two states apportion their votes too
  13. not yet. Lol
  14. “It” can be many things.
  15. Correction: those running posters were ignored continuously. They were also asked to stop reporting posts. The events in question were both reported by non-involved 3rd party members who thought the line was crossed.
  16. I think that’s what I said.
  17. Political leaders are lagging indicators. Candidates are chosen by the people, the people aren’t lead by the candidate. As an example, look up the post-mortem plans after the Rs lost the 2012 election. In 2016, people chose the candidate that was the exact opposite of their moving forward goals agreed to in 2012.
  18. no one uses those terms like more X, but the result is the same. Honestly, I suspect 35-40% to be hostile to most of the those goals. 🤷🏼‍♂️
  19. Oh, I don’t think that list is common to people at all.
  20. does this mean you aren’t interested in guessing? Lol We could include something for the winner.
  21. Better science > science
  22. polls are half science and half art. Both are interesting and most pollsters try to get things right. I love the science and analysis behind them.
  23. Would anyone care to have a contest on guessing the electoral college count? We can do it closest to the total or we could do something by guessing the maps?
  24. feel free to send me a PM and Point out who is acting in bad faith. In fact, anyone could do that if they’d like.
×
×
  • Create New...