Jump to content

SDS

Administrator
  • Posts

    10,199
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SDS

  1. I hope they right that ship to a cool 6-10.
  2. Adam Gase post-game.
  3. The question is what is he rated in the year 2020? I think it’s certainly less than when he was drafted.
  4. Trigger has spoken.
  5. oh, unless it’s 2000 and I expect a winner to be declared way before then. But that might not be a bad selection given that it is a tiebreaker anyway.
  6. I like it. Tie breaker goes to? National vote margin takes a really long time to sort out. Like six months. What would be quicker, yet still interesting?
  7. Two states apportion their votes too
  8. not yet. Lol
  9. “It” can be many things.
  10. Correction: those running posters were ignored continuously. They were also asked to stop reporting posts. The events in question were both reported by non-involved 3rd party members who thought the line was crossed.
  11. I think that’s what I said.
  12. Political leaders are lagging indicators. Candidates are chosen by the people, the people aren’t lead by the candidate. As an example, look up the post-mortem plans after the Rs lost the 2012 election. In 2016, people chose the candidate that was the exact opposite of their moving forward goals agreed to in 2012.
  13. no one uses those terms like more X, but the result is the same. Honestly, I suspect 35-40% to be hostile to most of the those goals. 🤷🏼‍♂️
  14. Oh, I don’t think that list is common to people at all.
  15. does this mean you aren’t interested in guessing? Lol We could include something for the winner.
  16. Better science > science
  17. polls are half science and half art. Both are interesting and most pollsters try to get things right. I love the science and analysis behind them.
  18. Would anyone care to have a contest on guessing the electoral college count? We can do it closest to the total or we could do something by guessing the maps?
  19. feel free to send me a PM and Point out who is acting in bad faith. In fact, anyone could do that if they’d like.
  20. If they work together, make no mistake this is due to the good graces of the organization and the NFL.
  21. For anyone who follows trademark law, they will understand that confusion is central to the issue. If people are confused about the bills not owning bills mafia then it’s done. They have to control that and protect their property.
  22. Who said they want to take credit for it? The problem is that regardless of what they wanted, the term became associated with the team and once that happens you can’t have the NFL industry referring to a private persons property. The NFL is like a real thing you know what I mean?
  23. what everyone is missing here is that broadcasters, NFL personalities, players, etc...’have adopted that terminology towards the team. Therefore that term is recognized by society as being associated with the Buffalo Bills. That’s where this got ugly for some people. Honestly, this is the correct decision and I have wondered why it was taken this long to come down. that would have never been granted
  24. Low effort part is geared towards me and the other people who volunteered to moderated bills for him, not a political one. Although I have been here in recent weeks, I just know from my own life that this is not sustainable for myself. it should be noted in all of this time that no one came to me and said hey I’d like to lend a hand. 🤷🏼‍♂️
×
×
  • Create New...