SDS

Regardless of Obama's plan, what needs to be noted here is that we don't elect Kings. Who here thinks the Democrats in Congress aren't chomping at the bit to lower those thresholds substantially? Do some of you people really expect not to hear "Well, I know we promised X, but now that we are here - the mess is SO big - bigger than we thought, we are going to have to all be more patriotic and lower those thresholds." Take that to the bank. OTOH, if Obama enacts his plan as detailed on his website then every pinko-liberal out there supporting this plan should kiss our fat-conservative asses because we essentially won the tax debate (at least 75% of the debate). The fact that we have an election on who is going to cut taxes more (with disagreements at the margins) is a victory for the conservatives. With that said, I personally don't believe for one NY second that this congress isn't going to raise taxes on every Tom, Dick, and Hussein in this country.

It's called "spreading the wealth". The Bills are just getting a head start on that...

Again?

"There but for the grace of God go I"... Let's hope no one in this thread requires prolonged pain management therapy.

Look, there are a LOT of planetariums that need refurbishing. Once we get that under control - we can talk about tightening the ol' belt.

Fixed the link.

I only knew about 3 of them If they were ranked - jennicam should have been #1.

Maybe he thinks "Toni" is a chick?

lowercase is the new uppercase...

It matters for two reasons: Supreme Court Possible super-majority for 2 years. add to that my tax bill and the possibility of nationalizing something like health care - which can never be undone - and that is enough to vote for the lesser of two evils - McCain.

Pay. Per. View. Eliminate the deficit instantly!

1 post per year? Pace yourself.... pace yourself...

Say "hi" from me!

that is one option certainly. The url is a little longer in that case. Maybe that is a better choice, but most websites go the forums.domain.com route. From a user interface stand point, going with the familiar is usually better.

The demands on the readership are onerous at times...

Our SabresReport/SabreSpace dual-headed monster has gotten me to think about how we have structured things and me no likey what I see. Time to tighten the ship!

I guess the big inconvenience will be that everyone will have to log in again. Therefore, I strongly suggest everyone update their email addresses (for lost password services) and/or know what your current password is.

I'm not sure people put a lot of emphasis on the name of a subsection and the url that leads to it - especially if the url is semantically correct.

If I understand you correctly, I don't think I'm suggesting renaming the forums - just the main URL. Maybe I would need to shore up the branding of the forums simultaneously...

Complain to them not us... We aren't in the business of critiquing other fan sites.

For a variety of reasons, I think having the board split off from the Two Bills Drive domain name may not be the best way to handle the situation. I registered stadiumwall.com during the evil Rivals.com years in order save the board from their diabolical clutches. However, now I'm thinking that maybe it would be beneficial to re-unite the board with it's roots and have everyone go to: forums.twobillsdrive.com I would, of course, do some fancy rocket science stuff and have all the stadiumwall.com links go to the right place. Any objections to this?

Just read the stupid clever headlines on the front page. Could these guys give it a rest already? "Edwards has turned longtime-counterfeit Bills into contenders" "Bills overpower Chargers in powerless stadium" "Bills short-circuit Chargers"

[This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive subject lines. The topic starter can edit the subject line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.

[This is an automated response] This subject matter is being currently being discussed or has already been discussed in a previous thread. Please consider using the "search" function before starting new topics. Thank you.

[This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive subject lines. The topic starter can edit the subject line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.