SDS

[This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive subject lines. The topic starter can edit the subject line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.

I agree with you 100% and I am basing this on my read of this thread and NOT anything else. NFW 20 minutes before the cut someone posts this, who has also done this before, and doesn't go bananas when it happens.

125 posts and you are trying to dictate who should stay and who should go? Really?

Why not complain about keeping that weak legged kicker Scott Norwood? It would have been just as timely.

[This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive subject lines. The topic starter can edit the subject line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.

[This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive subject lines. The topic starter can edit the subject line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.

[This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive subject lines. The topic starter can edit the subject line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.

Dude, I could have written that myself. Thanks, nfw I was going to type all that out.

[This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive subject lines. The topic starter can edit the subject line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.

FWIW, the Redskins beat reporter, in explaining that Dock will soon be replaced by a draft pick, said that last year not a SINGLE coach on the Skins' staff wanted Dockery back. It was all Vinnie Cerato reclaiming a past project.

If he wanted to post that here - he would have.

So, you would have been happy with 4 of those 6 second rounders being selected at #9?

[This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive subject lines. The topic starter can edit the subject line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.

[This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive subject lines. The topic starter can edit the subject line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.

[This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive subject lines. The topic starter can edit the subject line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.

No problem. Don't forget there are 2 pages!

http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/gallery/category/15-tailgate-11/

The guy in front of me spilled beer all over the guy in front of him and then passed out on his lucky girlfriend.

Meh. Oline troubles are independent of Edwards. He had plenty of opportunity today on many plays, especially later on (not so much early). Quite frankly, you have to wonder if his football sense IQ is a negative number. His decision to throw 2 yard passes on 3rd and ten come remarkably too easy. His willingness to burn precious seconds running around at the end of the game and his unwillingness to feel enough desperation to just throw the freakin' ball all point to a guy who isn't a ball player. He has no sense for the game. And sooner or later, even if you do have a good oline, you are going to face pressure. If you make the playoffs, you will face pressure. This guy just isn't wired to deal with it.

Seriously? I've been advertising this same pool all week.

We have the article listed right on the front page...

Not yet. The subject has been discussed (as well as hearing the video replay discussions) but the NFL isn't ready for that yet.

http://www.fanvision.com

bump...