SDS

[This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive topic titles. A single name if far too vague to post as a title and provides little insight into what specifically the post is talking about.The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.

I didn’t realize you could see that.

this was actually a “feature“ that has gone away. The idea of being that we mostly serve return users, so many people have already read a portion of most topics. if they clicked on one of those headlines it would take them to the last unread post in that topic.

For $8 a month I’ll send you a TBD checkmark and it will work fine.

[This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive topic titles. A single name if far too vague to post as a title and provides little insight into what specifically the post is talking about.The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.

This stuff is awful. Why does dressing up or doing stupid ***** make you a bigger fan than anyone else? That’s a dumb ass merit function.

because it has nothing to do with the Buffalo Bills and the only thing it does is devolve into political fighting. Maybe you haven’t dealt with this horseshit for three years, but some of us have.

all right then. Why don’t you go ahead and tell me when the last conversation about Travis Henry’s children occurred as well as the last time Jim Kelly’s exploits 30 years ago was discussed as a new topic. I’ll hang up and listen.

there’s literally nothing new to say here.

Is there a point where we can just move on?

Paragraphs are your friends.

why do you care if he cares?

A neighbor…

Flag on the play. Improper grammar conduct. Offense. 10 post penalty. Fourth down.

so we need a different design to satisfy the architectural insustry? Lol GTFO

I doubt you’ll find any fan that gives a rats ass if there’s another stadium in a different sport that has similar features on the other side of the world.

sarcasm.

that’s what she said.

figure out your paragraph breaks. I’m not reading that. “New paragraph” works on voice to text.

Are you saying this looks like the current stadium? Because that’s weird. If I was to nitpick anything it’s that the renderings give off a very shiny, modern vibe to an area that is distinctly not that style. My sense is that it would feel kind of off in OP. I could see a stadium like this in a place like Chicago with tremendous amounts of great architecture. Hopefully I’m wrong.

League of legends deck. Esports is pretty popular.

you have to trust that they’re not lying when they say 65% of the seats are covered. I just don’t think you can get to 65% with your description. The only way this makes sense is that 40,000 seats are covered and 20,000 seats in the lower bowl are not. now, I don’t know what it means to be undercover if you’re in the lower bowl and the roofline is 50 feet above you.

Just have to figure out where the fans are in each third and who is included in the 65%. I'm guessing 2/3 of the lower bowl is uncovered.

Lol. Thanks. I'm an optical engineer who also uses SolidWorks. I'm also a computer guy. I can handle the discussion. I also have designed my own lenses in optical design software. And I'm an pro-am photographer.

Whatever the perspective they are using isn't natural. The lower bowl isn't going to be flat on one side. Real estate photos are "accurate" too. Rooms don't look that way though.